Leiter Valerie, Delaune Gracyn
Department of Public Health, Simmons University, 300 Fenway, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Sociology, Simmons University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2025 May;29(5):724-731. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04098-3. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a highly effective form of contraception. This paper examines who is more likely to use an IUD, who is more likely to discontinue IUD use due to dissatisfaction, and reasons for dissatisfaction, just before and after the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision that eliminated the federal right to abortion.
This study analyzes data from the 2017-2019 and 2022-2023 National Survey of Family Growth. Changes in IUD prevalence and removal for dissatisfaction were estimated. Logistic regression was used to examine IUD use and discontinuation due to dissatisfaction. Respondents' reasons for discontinuation were explored.
IUD use increased very slightly but significantly, from 11.6 to 13.0%. Education, age, race, insurance status, living in a rural area, having given birth, and wanting any/more children were significant predictors of IUD use. The percentage of women who discontinued IUD use due to dissatisfaction decreased significantly, from 33.2 to 22.2%. Education and race/ethnicity were significant predictors of IUD removal. Most women who discontinued use due to dissatisfaction reported side effects.
IUDs are an increasingly important contraceptive method in the post-Dobbs era. However, we need to keep an eye on possible patient problems with the devices, particularly side effects such as pain, bleeding, and device migration, and educate patients on these possible side effects in advance of inserting an IUD. We also need to maintain users' ability to remove their IUDs if its benefits no longer outweigh its side effects, to preserve patient autonomy and well-being.
宫内节育器(IUD)是一种高效的避孕方式。本文探讨了在最高法院做出废除联邦堕胎权的多布斯裁决前后,哪些人更有可能使用宫内节育器,哪些人因不满而更有可能停止使用宫内节育器,以及不满的原因。
本研究分析了2017 - 2019年和2022 - 2023年全国家庭成长调查的数据。估计了宫内节育器使用率和因不满而取出节育器的变化情况。使用逻辑回归分析来研究宫内节育器的使用情况以及因不满而停用的情况。探究了受访者停用节育器的原因。
宫内节育器的使用率略有但显著上升,从11.6%升至13.0%。教育程度、年龄、种族、保险状况、居住在农村地区、生育情况以及是否想要孩子(任何/更多孩子)是宫内节育器使用的显著预测因素。因不满而停止使用宫内节育器的女性比例显著下降,从33.2%降至22.2%。教育程度和种族/族裔是宫内节育器取出的显著预测因素。大多数因不满而停止使用的女性报告了副作用。
在多布斯裁决后的时代,宫内节育器是一种越来越重要的避孕方法。然而,我们需要关注使用该器械可能出现的患者问题,特别是疼痛、出血和器械移位等副作用,并在插入宫内节育器之前就这些可能的副作用对患者进行教育。如果宫内节育器的益处不再超过其副作用,我们还需要保持使用者取出节育器的能力,以维护患者的自主权和健康。