Martín-Sánchez Rafael, Sanz-García Ancor, Diaz-Gonzalez Samantha, Castro Villamor Miguel Ángel, Sáez-Belloso Silvia, Rabanales Sotos Joseba, Pinilla-Arribas Leyre T, González-Izquierdo Pablo, de Santos Sánchez Sara, Martín-Rodríguez Francisco
Advanced Life Support, Emergency Medical Services (SACYL), 47003 Valladolid, Spain.
Faculty of Nursing, Universidad de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 1;15(4):447. doi: 10.3390/bs15040447.
The aim of the present study was to compare the anxiety of undergraduate medical students who were conducting clinical simulation (CS) prepandemic, during the pandemic, and postvaccination. The participants carried out an emergency simulation in a high-fidelity clinical skills laboratory. A prospective, simulation-based clinical cohort study of sixth-year undergraduate medical students was performed over three time periods: from 1 January to 15 April 2019; from 28 September to 18 December 2020; and from 11 May to 18 May 2022. The primary outcome was anxiety level (pre- and postsimulation) measured with the STAI test. Data on student demographics and baseline vital signs (before CS) were collected. A total of 373 students were ultimately included. A total of 40.2% of the cases were prepandemic (150 cases), 20.4% were pandemic (76 cases), and 39.4% were postvaccination (147 cases). The study period had a statistically significant effect on anxiety. There was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of anxiety during the pandemic time period compared with that during the prepandemic and postvaccination periods; no difference was found between the prepandemic and postvaccination periods. Performing CS in biohazardous environments significantly increases anxiety levels, so establishing mitigating measures to minimize the undesired effects of anxiety and promote the simulation-based learning process is necessary. The study was carried out at a single university; in future studies, it is necessary to carry out multicenter investigations to confirm the results.
本研究的目的是比较本科医学生在疫情前、疫情期间和接种疫苗后的临床模拟(CS)中的焦虑情况。参与者在高保真临床技能实验室进行了一次急救模拟。对六年级本科医学生进行了一项基于模拟的前瞻性临床队列研究,研究分三个时间段进行:2019年1月1日至4月15日;2020年9月28日至12月18日;2022年5月11日至5月18日。主要结局是用状态特质焦虑问卷(STAI)测试测量的(模拟前和模拟后)焦虑水平。收集了学生人口统计学数据和基线生命体征(CS前)。最终共纳入373名学生。其中40.2%的病例发生在疫情前(150例),20.4%发生在疫情期间(76例),39.4%发生在接种疫苗后(147例)。研究时间段对焦虑有统计学显著影响。与疫情前和接种疫苗后的时间段相比,疫情期间焦虑发生率有统计学显著增加;疫情前和接种疫苗后的时间段之间未发现差异。在生物危害环境中进行CS会显著增加焦虑水平,因此有必要制定缓解措施,以尽量减少焦虑的不良影响,并促进基于模拟的学习过程。该研究在一所大学进行;在未来的研究中,有必要进行多中心调查以证实结果。