• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生成式人工智能服务中的消费者自主性:任务难度和人工智能设计元素在增强信任、满意度和使用意愿方面的作用。

Consumer Autonomy in Generative AI Services: The Role of Task Difficulty and AI Design Elements in Enhancing Trust, Satisfaction, and Usage Intention.

作者信息

Han Jihyung, Ko Daekyun

机构信息

Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.

Department of Consumer Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;15(4):534. doi: 10.3390/bs15040534.

DOI:10.3390/bs15040534
PMID:40282155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12024212/
Abstract

As generative AI services become increasingly integrated into consumer decision making, concerns have grown regarding their influence on consumer autonomy-the extent to which individuals retain independent control over AI-assisted decisions. Although these services offer efficiency and convenience, they can simultaneously constrain consumer decision making, potentially impacting trust, satisfaction, and usage intention. This study investigates the role of perceived consumer autonomy in shaping consumer responses, specifically examining how task difficulty (Study 1) and AI service design elements-explainability, feedback, and shared responsibility (Study 2)-influence autonomy perceptions and subsequent consumer outcomes. Using two scenario-based experiments involving a total of 708 participants, the results reveal that perceived autonomy significantly enhances consumer trust, particularly in contexts involving high task difficulty. Among the tested AI design interventions, shared responsibility emerged as most effective in enhancing perceived autonomy, trust, satisfaction, and long-term engagement, whereas explainability and feedback alone showed limited impact. These findings underscore the importance of designing AI services that actively support consumer agency through user-involved decision-making frameworks rather than relying solely on passive informational transparency. Theoretical implications for consumer autonomy in AI interactions are discussed, along with practical recommendations for designing consumer-centered AI services.

摘要

随着生成式人工智能服务越来越融入消费者决策过程,人们对其对消费者自主性的影响日益担忧,即个人对人工智能辅助决策保持独立控制的程度。尽管这些服务提供了效率和便利,但它们同时也可能限制消费者决策,潜在地影响信任、满意度和使用意愿。本研究调查了感知到的消费者自主性在塑造消费者反应中的作用,具体考察任务难度(研究1)以及人工智能服务设计元素——可解释性、反馈和共同责任(研究2)——如何影响自主性感知以及随后的消费者结果。通过两项基于场景的实验,共涉及708名参与者,结果表明,感知到的自主性显著增强消费者信任,尤其是在任务难度较高的情况下。在测试的人工智能设计干预措施中,共同责任在增强感知到的自主性、信任、满意度和长期参与度方面最为有效,而仅可解释性和反馈的影响有限。这些发现强调了设计人工智能服务的重要性,即通过用户参与的决策框架积极支持消费者自主性,而不是仅仅依赖被动的信息透明度。讨论了人工智能交互中消费者自主性的理论意义,以及设计以消费者为中心的人工智能服务的实际建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f771/12024212/095a3c9818e1/behavsci-15-00534-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f771/12024212/4f1c2d5259ee/behavsci-15-00534-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f771/12024212/cae740a365fd/behavsci-15-00534-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f771/12024212/095a3c9818e1/behavsci-15-00534-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f771/12024212/4f1c2d5259ee/behavsci-15-00534-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f771/12024212/cae740a365fd/behavsci-15-00534-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f771/12024212/095a3c9818e1/behavsci-15-00534-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Consumer Autonomy in Generative AI Services: The Role of Task Difficulty and AI Design Elements in Enhancing Trust, Satisfaction, and Usage Intention.生成式人工智能服务中的消费者自主性:任务难度和人工智能设计元素在增强信任、满意度和使用意愿方面的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;15(4):534. doi: 10.3390/bs15040534.
2
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Recommendations and Functional Food Purchases: Understanding Consumer Decision-Making.人工智能驱动的推荐与功能性食品购买:理解消费者的决策过程
Foods. 2025 Mar 13;14(6):976. doi: 10.3390/foods14060976.
3
The impact of human-AI collaboration types on consumer evaluation and usage intention: a perspective of responsibility attribution.人机协作类型对消费者评价和使用意愿的影响:责任归因视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 30;14:1277861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277861. eCollection 2023.
4
Trust and Acceptance Challenges in the Adoption of AI Applications in Health Care: Quantitative Survey Analysis.医疗保健领域采用人工智能应用中的信任与接受挑战:定量调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 21;27:e65567. doi: 10.2196/65567.
5
Perceived Trust and Professional Identity Threat in AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scenario-Based Experimental Study on AI Process Design Features.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统中的感知信任与职业身份威胁:关于人工智能流程设计特征的情景式实验研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 26;9:e64266. doi: 10.2196/64266.
6
Population Preferences for Performance and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Choice-Based Conjoint Survey.人群对医疗人工智能性能和可解释性的偏好:基于选择的联合调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 13;23(12):e26611. doi: 10.2196/26611.
7
The More Realism, the Better? How Does the Realism of AI Customer Service Agents Influence Customer Satisfaction and Repeat Purchase Intention in Service Recovery.越真实越好?人工智能客服代理的真实感如何影响服务补救中的顾客满意度和重复购买意愿。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;14(12):1182. doi: 10.3390/bs14121182.
8
Exploring Peoples' Perception of Autonomy and Reactance in Everyday AI Interactions.探索人们在日常人工智能交互中对自主性和反抗心理的认知。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:713074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713074. eCollection 2021.
9
Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.社交商务平台上消费者的决策过程:在线信任、感知风险与购买意愿
Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890. eCollection 2020.
10
Artificial Intelligence and Patient Autonomy in Obesity Treatment Decisions: An Empirical Study of the Challenges.肥胖治疗决策中的人工智能与患者自主性:挑战的实证研究
Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49725. eCollection 2023 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the role of AI algorithmic agents: The impact of algorithmic decision autonomy on consumer purchase decisions.探索人工智能算法主体的作用:算法决策自主性对消费者购买决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1009173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009173. eCollection 2022.
2
The impact of perceived control and power on adolescents' acceptance intention of intelligent online services.感知控制和权力对青少年智能在线服务接受意愿的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:1013436. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013436. eCollection 2022.
3
Exploring Peoples' Perception of Autonomy and Reactance in Everyday AI Interactions.
探索人们在日常人工智能交互中对自主性和反抗心理的认知。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:713074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713074. eCollection 2021.
4
Autonomy in consumer choice.消费者选择的自主性。
Mark Lett. 2020;31(4):429-439. doi: 10.1007/s11002-020-09521-z. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare.论医疗保健中算法决策的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;46(3):205-211. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105586. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
6
Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI.计算机最懂?医疗 AI 需要价值灵活性。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;45(3):156-160. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105118. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Measuring cognitive distortions in pathological gambling: review and meta-analyses.病理性赌博认知扭曲的测量:综述与元分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):730-43. doi: 10.1037/a0031892. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
8
Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators.自动化偏差:频率、影响中介和缓解因素的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):121-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
9
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.自我决定理论与内在动机、社会发展和幸福感的促进
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.