Liu Xiaoxian, Fan Hengyuan, Xiong Ruijuan, An Lei, Wang Yiming, Du Ruojuan, Ding Xiaosheng
Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;15(4):543. doi: 10.3390/bs15040543.
The present study used a person-centered approach to examine the latent patterns of cumulative family risk and emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents and their relationships with non-suicidal self-injury. A sample of 1046 primary and secondary school students was analyzed using latent class analysis and latent profile analysis to identify subgroups of cumulative family risk and emotion regulation difficulties, respectively. The results were as follows: (1) Two latent classes of cumulative family risk were identified: a high-risk group (30.78%) and a low-risk group (69.22%). Adolescents in the high-risk group had significantly higher self-injury scores. (2) Three latent profiles of emotion regulation difficulties were identified: a low-difficulty group (56.02%), a medium-difficulty group (32.60%), and a high-difficulty group (11.38%). Adolescents in the high-difficulty group had the highest self-injury scores. (3) The logistic regression showed that adolescents in the high-risk group were more likely to belong to the high-difficulty group, followed by the medium- and low-difficulty groups. In summary, adolescents with high levels of cumulative family risk are also more likely to exhibit high levels of emotion regulation difficulties and self-injurious behavior.
本研究采用以人为本的方法，探讨青少年累积家庭风险和情绪调节困难的潜在模式及其与非自杀性自伤行为的关系。使用潜在类别分析和潜在剖面分析，分别对1046名中小学生样本进行分析，以识别累积家庭风险和情绪调节困难的亚组。结果如下：（1）识别出累积家庭风险的两个潜在类别：高风险组（30.78%）和低风险组（69.22%）。高风险组青少年的自伤得分显著更高。（2）识别出情绪调节困难的三个潜在剖面：低困难组（56.02%）、中等困难组（32.60%）和高困难组（11.38%）。高困难组青少年的自伤得分最高。（3）逻辑回归显示，高风险组青少年更有可能属于高困难组，其次是中等困难组和低困难组。总之，累积家庭风险水平高的青少年也更有可能表现出高水平的情绪调节困难和自伤行为。
