• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平衡隐私、信任与公平:患者对物质使用障碍数据共享的看法

Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing.

作者信息

Wei Mengyi, Todd Michael, Campbell Aimee N C, Chern Darwyn, Lott Eric, Whitfield Mary J, Stavros Nick, Greenberg Elise, Grando Adela

机构信息

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 15;22(4):617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040617.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph22040617
PMID:40283841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12027209/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sharing substance use disorder (SUD) data is essential for advancing equitable healthcare and improving outcomes for marginalized populations. However, concerns about privacy, stigma, and adherence to data privacy regulations often hinder effective data sharing. This study explores patient preferences and considerations related to sharing SUD-related medical records, with a focus on the sociocultural and systemic factors that shape their willingness to share.

METHODS

A total of 357 adult patients from four community-based clinics in Arizona participated in a cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey assessed sociodemographic factors, experiences of stigma (self-directed, anticipated, and provider-based), trust in healthcare providers, satisfaction with care, and willingness to share SUD data across various scenarios. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and one-way ANOVA to uncover key associations.

RESULTS

Patients identified SUD history, diagnoses, and treatment information as particularly sensitive. Stigma was significantly correlated with increased sensitivity and reduced willingness to share data, especially with providers outside their primary facility ( < 0.001). In contrast, trust in providers and higher satisfaction with care were linked to greater willingness to share data with all providers ( < 0.01). Patients were more inclined to share SUD data during emergencies or for direct treatment purposes than for administrative or research applications ( < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

These findings underscore the ethical imperative to address stigma and foster trust to promote equitable SUD data sharing. Policies must empower patients with control over sensitive health information while ensuring cultural competence and fairness in care delivery. Ensuring that patients feel confident in how their data are used may encourage greater participation in health information exchange, ultimately supporting more effective and individualized SUD care.

摘要

背景

共享物质使用障碍(SUD)数据对于推进公平的医疗保健和改善边缘化人群的治疗结果至关重要。然而,对隐私、污名化以及遵守数据隐私法规的担忧常常阻碍有效的数据共享。本研究探讨了患者与共享SUD相关医疗记录有关的偏好和考量因素,重点关注塑造其共享意愿的社会文化和系统因素。

方法

来自亚利桑那州四个社区诊所的357名成年患者参与了一项横断面电子调查。该调查评估了社会人口学因素、污名化经历(自我导向、预期和基于提供者的)、对医疗保健提供者的信任、对护理的满意度以及在各种情况下共享SUD数据的意愿。使用描述性统计、Pearson相关性分析和单因素方差分析对数据进行分析,以揭示关键关联。

结果

患者将SUD病史、诊断和治疗信息视为特别敏感的信息。污名化与更高的敏感性和更低的数据共享意愿显著相关,尤其是与他们主要医疗机构以外的提供者共享时(<0.001)。相比之下,对提供者的信任和更高的护理满意度与更愿意与所有提供者共享数据相关(<0.01)。与用于行政或研究用途相比,患者在紧急情况下或直接用于治疗目的时更倾向于共享SUD数据(<0.001)。

讨论

这些发现强调了解决污名化和建立信任以促进公平的SUD数据共享的伦理必要性。政策必须赋予患者对敏感健康信息的控制权,同时确保在提供护理时具备文化能力和公平性。确保患者对其数据的使用方式感到放心,可能会鼓励他们更多地参与健康信息交换,最终支持更有效和个性化的SUD护理。

相似文献

1
Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing.平衡隐私、信任与公平:患者对物质使用障碍数据共享的看法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 15;22(4):617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040617.
2
Advancing Health Equity Through Substance Use Medical Record Data Sharing: Insights from Healthcare Providers.通过物质使用病历数据共享促进健康公平:来自医疗保健提供者的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 21;22(4):462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040462.
3
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.基于网络和移动设备的研究中的隐私、信任与数据共享:美国全国范围内大量男男性行为者样本中的参与者观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019.
4
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.影响加州消费者共享电子健康数据意愿的因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x.
5
Trust and Privacy: How Patient Trust in Providers is Related to Privacy Behaviors and Attitudes.信任与隐私:患者对医疗服务提供者的信任与隐私行为及态度的关系
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:487-493. eCollection 2019.
6
Privacy Concerns Versus Personalized Health Content-Pregnant Individuals' Willingness to Share Personal Health Information on Social Media: Survey Study.隐私担忧与个性化健康内容——孕妇在社交媒体上分享个人健康信息的意愿:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 10;9:e60862. doi: 10.2196/60862.
7
Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience.用于健康研究的医学数据共享:早期个人健康记录经验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 25;12(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1356.
8
Trust, confidentiality, and the acceptability of sharing HIV-related patient data: lessons learned from a mixed methods study about Health Information Exchanges.信任、保密性和共享 HIV 相关患者数据的可接受性:来自健康信息交换混合方法研究的经验教训。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 19;7:34. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-34.
9
Factors Influencing the Sharing of Personal Health Data Based on the Integrated Theory of Privacy Calculus and Theory of Planned Behaviors Framework: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Patients in the Yangtze River Delta.基于隐私计算综合理论和计划行为理论框架的个人健康数据共享影响因素分析:来自长三角地区中国患者的横断面研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 6;25:e46562. doi: 10.2196/46562.
10
The benefits, risks and costs of privacy: patient preferences and willingness to pay.隐私的益处、风险与成本:患者偏好及支付意愿
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 May;33(5):845-851. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1292229. Epub 2017 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences of healthcare and substance use treatment provider-based stigma among patients receiving methadone.接受美沙酮治疗的患者中基于医疗保健和药物使用治疗提供者的污名化经历。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Feb 7;6:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100138. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
The Stigma and Self-Stigma Scales for attitudes to mental health problems: Psychometric properties and its relationship to mental health problems and absenteeism.针对心理健康问题态度的污名化与自我污名化量表:心理测量特性及其与心理健康问题和旷工的关系。
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Jun 28;10(3):35630. eCollection 2022.
3
Relentless Stigma: A Qualitative Analysis of a Substance Use Recovery Needs Assessment.无情的污名:物质使用康复需求评估的定性分析
Subst Abuse. 2022 May 30;16:11782218221097396. doi: 10.1177/11782218221097396. eCollection 2022.
4
Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study.行为健康专业人员对患者控制的细粒度信息共享的看法(第1部分):焦点小组研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):e21208. doi: 10.2196/21208.
5
Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球、区域和国家 204 个地区 1990-2019 年 12 种精神障碍疾病的负担:基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Recommendations to Inform Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing Research: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.建议告知物质使用障碍数据共享研究:范围审查和主题分析。
J Addict Med. 2022;16(3):261-271. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000893.
7
A pilot comparison of medical records sensitivity perspectives of patients with behavioral health conditions and healthcare providers.行为健康状况患者与医疗保健提供者的医疗记录敏感性视角的初步比较。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):14604582211009925. doi: 10.1177/14604582211009925.
8
Stigma and substance use disorders: A clinical, research, and advocacy agenda.污名与物质使用障碍:临床、研究与倡导议程。
Am Psychol. 2020 Dec;75(9):1300-1311. doi: 10.1037/amp0000744.
9
Disclosure, Stigma, and Social Support among Young People Receiving Treatment for Substance Use Disorders and their Caregivers: A Qualitative Analysis.接受物质使用障碍治疗的年轻人及其照顾者的信息披露、污名化和社会支持:一项定性分析。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2019 Dec;17(6):1535-1549. doi: 10.1007/s11469-018-9930-8. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Sharing Is Caring-Data Sharing Initiatives in Healthcare.共享即关爱——医疗保健领域的数据共享计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):3046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093046.