• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于健康研究的医学数据共享:早期个人健康记录经验。

Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience.

作者信息

Weitzman Elissa R, Kaci Liljana, Mandl Kenneth D

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 25;12(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1356.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.1356
PMID:20501431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2956225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engaging consumers in sharing information from personally controlled health records (PCHRs) for health research may promote goals of improving care and advancing public health consistent with the federal Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Understanding consumer willingness to share data is critical to advancing this model.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to characterize consumer willingness to share PCHR data for health research and the conditions and contexts bearing on willingness to share.

METHODS

A mixed method approach integrating survey and narrative data was used. Survey data were collected about attitudes toward sharing PCHR information for health research from early adopters (n = 151) of a live PCHR populated with medical records and self-reported behavioral and social data. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression to characterize willingness, conditions for sharing, and variations by sociodemographic factors. Narrative data were collected through semistructured focus group and one-on-one interviews with a separate sample of community members (n = 30) following exposure to PCHR demonstrations. Two independent analysts coded narrative data for major and minor themes using a shared rubric of a priori defined codes and an iterative inductive process. Findings were triangulated with survey results to identify patterns.

RESULTS

Of PHCR users, 138 out of 151 (91%) were willing to share medical information for health research with 89 (59%) favoring an opt-in sharing model. Willingness to share was conditioned by anonymity, research use, engagement with a trusted intermediary, transparency around PCHR access and use, and payment. Consumer-determined restrictions on content and timing of sharing may be prerequisites to sharing. Select differences in support for sharing under different conditions were observed across social groups. No gender differences were observed; however differences in age, role, and self-rated health were found. For example, students were more likely than nonstudents to favor an opt-out sharing default (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 - 7.62, P = .03). Participants over age 50 were less likely than younger participants to report that payment would increase willingness to share (unadjusted OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 - 0.96, P < .001). Students were more likely than nonstudents to report that payment would increase their willingness to share (unadjusted OR 9.62, 95% CI 3.44 - 26.87, P < .001). Experiencing a public health emergency may increase willingness to share especially among persons over 50 (unadjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.05, P = .02); however, students were less likely than non-students to report this attitude (unadjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.36, P < .001). Finally, subjects with fair or poor self-rated health were less likely than those with good to excellent self-rated health to report that willingness to share would increase during a public health emergency (unadjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38 - 0.97, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Strong support for sharing of PCHR information for health research existed among early adopters and focus group participants, with support varying by social group under different conditions and contexts. Allowing users to select their preferred conditions for sharing may be vital to supporting sharing and fostering trust as may be development of safety monitoring mechanisms.

摘要

背景

让消费者参与分享个人健康记录(PCHR)中的信息用于健康研究,可能有助于实现改善医疗服务和促进公共卫生的目标,这与联邦《经济和临床健康的健康信息技术》(HITECH)法案相一致。了解消费者分享数据的意愿对于推进这一模式至关重要。

目的

旨在描述消费者分享PCHR数据用于健康研究的意愿以及影响分享意愿的条件和背景。

方法

采用了一种整合调查和叙述性数据的混合方法。收集了关于从早期采用者(n = 151)那里获取的对分享PCHR信息用于健康研究的态度的调查数据,这些早期采用者使用的是一个包含医疗记录以及自我报告的行为和社会数据的实时PCHR。使用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析数据,以描述分享意愿、分享条件以及社会人口统计学因素导致的差异。通过半结构化焦点小组以及在向另一组社区成员(n = 30)展示PCHR演示后进行的一对一访谈收集叙述性数据。两名独立分析师使用预先定义的共享编码规则和迭代归纳过程对叙述性数据进行主要和次要主题编码。将研究结果与调查结果进行三角验证以识别模式。

结果

在151名PCHR用户中,有138名(91%)愿意分享医疗信息用于健康研究,其中89名(59%)倾向于选择加入的分享模式。分享意愿受到匿名性、研究用途、与可信赖中介机构的参与、PCHR访问和使用的透明度以及报酬的影响。消费者对分享内容和时机的自行设定限制可能是分享的前提条件。在不同社会群体中观察到了在不同条件下对分享支持的某些差异。未观察到性别差异;然而,发现了年龄、角色和自我评定健康状况方面的差异。例如,学生比非学生更倾向于选择退出的默认分享模式(未调整优势比[OR] = 2.89,95%置信区间[CI] 1.10 - 7.62,P = .03)。50岁以上的参与者比年轻参与者更不可能表示报酬会增加分享意愿(未调整OR = 0.94,95% CI 0.91 - 0.96,P < .001)。学生比非学生更有可能表示报酬会增加他们的分享意愿(未调整OR 9.62,95% CI 3.44 - 26.87,P < .001)。经历公共卫生紧急情况可能会增加分享意愿,尤其是在50岁以上的人群中(未调整OR 1.03,95% CI 1.01 - 1.05,P = .02);然而,学生比非学生更不可能有这种态度(未调整OR 0.13,95% CI 0.05 - 0.36,P < .001)。最后,自我评定健康状况为中等或较差的受试者比自我评定健康状况良好至优秀的受试者更不可能表示在公共卫生紧急情况期间分享意愿会增加(未调整OR 0.61,95% CI 0.38 - 0.97,P = .04)。

结论

早期采用者和焦点小组参与者对分享PCHR信息用于健康研究给予了大力支持,在不同条件和背景下,不同社会群体的支持程度有所不同。允许用户选择他们偏好的分享条件对于支持分享和建立信任可能至关重要,安全监测机制的开发也可能如此。

相似文献

1
Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience.用于健康研究的医学数据共享:早期个人健康记录经验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 25;12(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1356.
2
Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design.社区环境中个人控制的健康记录的可接受性:对政策和设计的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 29;11(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1187.
3
Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users.愿意分享个人健康记录数据以改善医疗和公共卫生:一项针对有经验的个人健康记录用户的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 22;12:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-39.
4
Consumer Willingness to Share Personal Digital Information for Health-Related Uses.消费者愿意分享个人数字信息用于健康相关用途。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44787.
5
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.影响加州消费者共享电子健康数据意愿的因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x.
6
Non-Hispanic White Mothers' Willingness to Share Personal Health Data With Researchers: Survey Results From an Opt-in Panel.非西班牙裔白人母亲与研究人员分享个人健康数据的意愿:来自选择加入小组的调查结果。
J Particip Med. 2020 May 15;12(2):e14062. doi: 10.2196/14062.
7
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.基于网络和移动设备的研究中的隐私、信任与数据共享:美国全国范围内大量男男性行为者样本中的参与者观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019.
8
Factors Influencing the Sharing of Personal Health Data Based on the Integrated Theory of Privacy Calculus and Theory of Planned Behaviors Framework: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Patients in the Yangtze River Delta.基于隐私计算综合理论和计划行为理论框架的个人健康数据共享影响因素分析:来自长三角地区中国患者的横断面研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 6;25:e46562. doi: 10.2196/46562.
9
Older adults' willingness to share their personal and health information when adopting healthcare technology and services.老年人在采用医疗保健技术和服务时愿意分享其个人和健康信息。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
Associations Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Physical and Psychological Functioning and Willingness to Share Social Media Data for Research Among Adolescents With a Chronic Rheumatic Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey.慢性风湿性疾病青少年患者报告的身体和心理功能结局测量与愿意分享社交媒体数据用于研究之间的关联:横断面调查
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Dec 6;6:e46555. doi: 10.2196/46555.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ethics of Informed Consent for Data Registries: Moving Beyond Moral Minimalism to the High Ground.数据登记处知情同意的伦理:从道德最低限度主义迈向更高标准。
Bioethics. 2025 Sep;39(7):709-715. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13438. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
The Impact of Trust and the Role of the Opt-Out Mechanism in Willingness to Share Health Data via Electronic Health Records in Germany: Telephone Survey Study.信任的影响以及退出机制在德国通过电子健康记录共享健康数据意愿中的作用:电话调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 15;12:e65718. doi: 10.2196/65718.
3
Parallel privacy preservation through partitioning (P4): a scalable data anonymization algorithm for health data.通过分区实现并行隐私保护(P4):一种用于健康数据的可扩展数据匿名化算法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02959-z.
4
Health data sharing in Germany: individual preconditions, trust and motives.德国的健康数据共享:个人前提条件、信任与动机。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;13:1538106. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1538106. eCollection 2025.
5
Twenty-Five Years of Evolution and Hurdles in Electronic Health Records and Interoperability in Medical Research: Comprehensive Review.电子健康记录在医学研究中的25年发展历程与障碍及互操作性:全面综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 9;27:e59024. doi: 10.2196/59024.
6
Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.测量个人健康信息共享意愿:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1213615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615. eCollection 2023.
7
Factors Influencing the Sharing of Personal Health Data Based on the Integrated Theory of Privacy Calculus and Theory of Planned Behaviors Framework: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Patients in the Yangtze River Delta.基于隐私计算综合理论和计划行为理论框架的个人健康数据共享影响因素分析:来自长三角地区中国患者的横断面研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 6;25:e46562. doi: 10.2196/46562.
8
Digital Education for the Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.数字化教育在医疗保健中人工智能的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 22;25:e43333. doi: 10.2196/43333.
9
Patient and researcher stakeholder preferences for use of electronic health record data: a qualitative study to guide the design and development of a platform to honor patient preferences.患者和研究人员利益相关者对使用电子健康记录数据的偏好:一项定性研究,以指导一个尊重患者偏好的平台的设计和开发。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 May 4;30(6):1137-49. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad058.
10
Privacy Concerns in Group Format Lifestyle Interventions for Obesity.群体生活方式干预肥胖的隐私问题。
Int J Behav Med. 2023 Oct;30(5):693-704. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10134-1. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?关于健康研究中使用个人信息的同意书:患有潜在污名化健康状况的人群与普通公众的意见是否存在差异?
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Jul 24;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-10.
2
Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design.社区环境中个人控制的健康记录的可接受性:对政策和设计的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 29;11(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1187.
3
Data protection and the promotion of health research: if the laws are not the problem, then what is?数据保护与健康研究的推进:如果法律不是问题所在,那么问题究竟出在哪里?
Healthc Policy. 2007 Feb;2(3):39-43.
4
An ethical framework for sharing patient data without consent.未经患者同意共享患者数据的伦理框架。
Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(4):257-62. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v16i4.701.
5
Holding personal information in a disease-specific register: the perspectives of people with multiple sclerosis and professionals on consent and access.在特定疾病登记册中保存个人信息:多发性硬化症患者和专业人员对同意和获取信息的看法。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):92-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025304.
6
Will PHRs rule the waves or roll out with the tide?个人健康记录会乘风破浪还是随波逐流?
Hosp Health Netw. 2008 Aug;82(8):36-9, 1.
7
Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?临床治理与研究伦理会成为英国基于低风险人群的健康研究的障碍吗?
BMC Public Health. 2008 Nov 28;8:396. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-396.
8
Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: insights from a public dialogue.健康研究获取个人信息的特定项目同意之外的其他方式:来自公众对话的见解。
BMC Med Ethics. 2008 Nov 19;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-18.
9
How the Social Web Supports patient experimentation with a new therapy: The demand for patient-controlled and patient-centered informatics.社交网络如何支持患者对新疗法进行试验:对患者控制和以患者为中心的信息学的需求。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:217-21.
10
Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies.患者可访问的电子健康记录:探索成功实施策略的建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Oct 31;10(4):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1061.