• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西塞拉多不同土地利用系统及其对土壤细菌群落的影响。

Different Land Use Systems in the Brazilian Cerrado and Their Effects on Soil Bacterial Communities.

作者信息

Reis Jefferson Brendon Almeida Dos, Oliveira Thayssa Monize Rosa de, Sartori da Silva Maria Regina Silveira, Lopes Fabyano Alvares Cardoso, de Paula Alessandra Monteiro, Pontes Nadson de Carvalho, Vale Helson Mario Martins do

机构信息

University of Brasilia, Institute of Biological Sciences, Brasília 70910-900, DF, Brazil.

Centro de Excelência em Bioinsumos (CEBIO), Instituto Federal Goiano, Campus Morrinhos, Morrinhos 75650-000, GO, Brazil.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 1;13(4):804. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040804.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms13040804
PMID:40284640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12029540/
Abstract

The effect of agricultural practices on soil bacterial communities is not constant and depends a lot on the climatic context, changes in the soil characteristics, land use, and agricultural strategy. Thus, knowledge about how different land use systems in the Cerrado influence the diversity and taxonomic structure of microbial communities under the same soil type remains limited. In this context, the objective of this work was to analyze and compare the bacterial communities of Cerrado soil under two different land use systems (cover crop and potato cultivation) and in a neighboring native Cerrado area. For this, we used high-throughput amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes (metabarcoding) to characterize the bacterial community at different taxonomic levels in a native Cerrado area, in a potato crop area, and in an area with cover crops. Our data indicated significant impacts on soil physicochemical properties and enzymatic activity, which directly reflect the dynamics of bacterial communities. The three bacterial phyla with the highest relative abundance in the three areas were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, and Acidobacteriota. At the taxonomic class level, small variations were observed among areas, while at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) level, these variations were more pronounced. The alpha diversity indices showed that the bacterial communities among the areas are rich and diverse. Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distance-based PCoA demonstrated an overlap of bacterial communities present in the cover crop area with the native Cerrado area and separation from the potato cultivation area. The in silico prediction demonstrated that the native Cerrado area presented the highest values of functional diversity of the soil bacterial community compared to the others. Thus, our results provide a holistic view of how different land use systems in the Cerrado can influence the taxonomic and functional diversity of soil bacterial communities.

摘要

农业实践对土壤细菌群落的影响并非一成不变,很大程度上取决于气候背景、土壤特性变化、土地利用方式和农业策略。因此,关于塞拉多地区不同土地利用系统如何在相同土壤类型下影响微生物群落多样性和分类结构的知识仍然有限。在此背景下,本研究的目的是分析和比较塞拉多地区两种不同土地利用系统(覆盖作物和马铃薯种植)以及邻近原生塞拉多地区土壤中的细菌群落。为此,我们使用16S rRNA基因的高通量扩增子测序(元条形码技术)来表征原生塞拉多地区、马铃薯种植区和覆盖作物区不同分类水平上的细菌群落。我们的数据表明,这些土地利用方式对土壤理化性质和酶活性有显著影响,而这直接反映了细菌群落的动态变化。这三个区域中相对丰度最高的三个细菌门是变形菌门、放线菌门和酸杆菌门。在分类纲水平上,各区域间观察到的差异较小,而在扩增子序列变体(ASV)水平上,这些差异更为明显。α多样性指数表明,各区域间的细菌群落丰富多样。基于Bray-Curtis和Jaccard距离的主坐标分析(PCoA)表明,覆盖作物区的细菌群落与原生塞拉多地区有重叠,与马铃薯种植区分离。计算机模拟预测表明,与其他区域相比,原生塞拉多地区土壤细菌群落的功能多样性值最高。因此,我们的研究结果全面展示了塞拉多地区不同土地利用系统如何影响土壤细菌群落的分类和功能多样性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/c123644f9c65/microorganisms-13-00804-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/2f403addf8c3/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/5832649f1396/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/7bb8b835408f/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/e80abb892023/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/64498da3cc07/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/f86e7d5a5a5e/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/117bcd8b9f4c/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/29daa44c3ff6/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/3e5a1bbd56db/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/1abfba84f8f5/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/82fe1564ab67/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/07be6e4da1a9/microorganisms-13-00804-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/1ce99e161bb6/microorganisms-13-00804-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/c3e8a2fbedac/microorganisms-13-00804-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/a3c95c48e3b9/microorganisms-13-00804-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/df918187fd27/microorganisms-13-00804-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/55db8e32f8b9/microorganisms-13-00804-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/c123644f9c65/microorganisms-13-00804-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/2f403addf8c3/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/5832649f1396/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/7bb8b835408f/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/e80abb892023/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/64498da3cc07/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/f86e7d5a5a5e/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/117bcd8b9f4c/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/29daa44c3ff6/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/3e5a1bbd56db/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/1abfba84f8f5/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/82fe1564ab67/microorganisms-13-00804-g0A11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/07be6e4da1a9/microorganisms-13-00804-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/1ce99e161bb6/microorganisms-13-00804-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/c3e8a2fbedac/microorganisms-13-00804-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/a3c95c48e3b9/microorganisms-13-00804-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/df918187fd27/microorganisms-13-00804-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/55db8e32f8b9/microorganisms-13-00804-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/12029540/c123644f9c65/microorganisms-13-00804-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Different Land Use Systems in the Brazilian Cerrado and Their Effects on Soil Bacterial Communities.巴西塞拉多不同土地利用系统及其对土壤细菌群落的影响。
Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 1;13(4):804. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040804.
2
Changes in diversity, abundance, and structure of soil bacterial communities in Brazilian Savanna under different land use systems.巴西热带稀树草原不同土地利用方式下土壤细菌群落多样性、丰度和结构的变化。
Microb Ecol. 2013 Oct;66(3):593-607. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0235-y. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
3
Shifts in taxonomic and functional microbial diversity with agriculture: How fragile is the Brazilian Cerrado?农业导致的微生物分类和功能多样性变化:巴西塞拉多有多脆弱?
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Mar 16;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0657-z.
4
Effect of sugarcane burning or green harvest methods on the Brazilian Cerrado soil bacterial community structure.甘蔗燃烧或绿色收获方法对巴西塞拉多土壤细菌群落结构的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059342. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
5
Structure and composition of bacterial and fungal community in soil under soybean monoculture in the Brazilian Cerrado.巴西塞拉多地区大豆单一种植下土壤中细菌和真菌群落的结构和组成。
Braz J Microbiol. 2010 Apr;41(2):391-403. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220100002000021. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
6
The profile of the soil microbiota in the Cerrado is influenced by land use.塞拉多地区土壤微生物群的概况受土地利用方式的影响。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jun;105(11):4791-4803. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11377-w. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
7
Distinct bacterial communities across a gradient of vegetation from a preserved Brazilian Cerrado.来自巴西一处保存完好的塞拉多地区不同植被梯度下的独特细菌群落。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017 Apr;110(4):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0815-1. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Assessment of soil bacterial communities in integrated crop production systems within the Amazon Biome, Brazil: a comparative study.巴西亚马逊生物群落中综合作物生产系统中土壤细菌群落的评估:一项比较研究。
Braz J Microbiol. 2024 Sep;55(3):2815-2825. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01352-8. Epub 2024 May 2.
9
Soil bacterial communities affected by land-use types in a small catchment area of the Balaton Uplands (Hungary).巴尔顿高地(匈牙利)小流域内土地利用类型对土壤细菌群落的影响。
Biol Futur. 2024 Sep;75(3):313-325. doi: 10.1007/s42977-024-00233-3. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
10
Comparison of soil bacterial communities under diverse agricultural land management and crop production practices.不同农业土地管理和作物生产实践下土壤细菌群落的比较。
Microb Ecol. 2008 Feb;55(2):293-310. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9276-4. Epub 2007 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Regenerative agriculture augments bacterial community structure for a healthier soil and agriculture.再生农业增强细菌群落结构,以实现更健康的土壤和农业。
Front Agron. 2023 May 5;5:1134514. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2023.1134514.
2
iNAP: An integrated network analysis pipeline for microbiome studies.iNAP:一种用于微生物组研究的综合网络分析流程。
Imeta. 2022 Mar 16;1(2):e13. doi: 10.1002/imt2.13. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Food for thought: Making the case for food produced via regenerative agriculture in the battle against non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs).
值得思考的问题:在对抗非传染性慢性病(NCDs)的斗争中,论证通过再生农业生产的食物的合理性。
One Health. 2024 Apr 20;18:100734. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100734. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Soil Carbon Stocks and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation of Agriculture in the Brazilian Cerrado-A Review.巴西塞拉多地区农业的土壤碳储量与温室气体减排——综述
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;12(13):2449. doi: 10.3390/plants12132449.
5
Elevated CO altered the nano-ZnO-induced influence on bacterial and fungal composition in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) rhizosphere soils.升高的 CO 改变了纳米 ZnO 对番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)根际土壤中细菌和真菌组成的诱导影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(30):75894-75907. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27744-1. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Bacterial communities in temperate and polar coastal sands are seasonally stable.温带和极地沿海沙地中的细菌群落具有季节性稳定性。
ISME Commun. 2021 Jun 28;1(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s43705-021-00028-w.
7
Sensitivity of and Soil Microorganisms to the Toxic Effect of Chromium (VI).和土壤微生物对六价铬毒性的敏感性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 22;24(1):178. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010178.
8
Effects of Tebuconazole Application on Soil Microbiota and Enzymes.唑醚·戊唑醇对土壤微生物及酶的影响。
Molecules. 2022 Nov 3;27(21):7501. doi: 10.3390/molecules27217501.
9
Impact of Soil Fertilized with Biomass Ash on Depth-Related Variability of Culturable Bacterial Diversity and Selected Physicochemical Parameters in Spring Barley Cultivation.生物质灰施肥对春大麦种植过程中与深度相关的可培养细菌多样性和部分理化参数变化的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(21):13721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113721.
10
Genome-resolved analyses show an extensive diversification in key aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading enzymes across bacteria and archaea.基因组解析分析表明,细菌和古菌中关键的好氧烃降解酶广泛多样化。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Oct 6;23(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08906-w.