Garland Joshua, Lee Juhyun
Centre for Sustainability Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Br J Sociol. 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13219.
Recent years witnessed mass migration towards Europe, from Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the 2015 Migrant Crisis linked to war in Syria. This article explores UK government discussion around these two significant crises, focussing on the challenges they present and the portrayal of refugees. It asks how far ministers' language differentiated between Ukrainians and Syrians regarding welfare deservingness. Thematically analysing over 100 official speeches, statements and press releases, the extent of racialisation and welfare chauvinism in ministers' discourse on refugees is revealed. Clear racialisation was found between the two refugee groups, but welfare chauvinism persisted for Ukrainians despite more favourable language, reflecting continued conditionality within UK government discussions of migration phenomena that may hold long-term implications for Ukrainian refugees in the UK.
近年来,由于2022年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰以及与叙利亚战争相关的2015年移民危机,大量人口向欧洲迁移。本文探讨了英国政府围绕这两场重大危机的讨论,重点关注它们带来的挑战以及对难民的描述。它探讨了部长们在福利应得性方面对乌克兰人和叙利亚人的语言区分程度。通过对100多篇官方演讲、声明和新闻稿进行主题分析,揭示了部长们关于难民的话语中种族化和福利沙文主义的程度。在这两个难民群体之间发现了明显的种族化现象,尽管对乌克兰人的措辞更为有利,但对乌克兰人的福利沙文主义依然存在,这反映出英国政府在讨论移民现象时持续存在的条件性,这可能对在英国的乌克兰难民产生长期影响。