Samuels Thomas H A, Molloy Sile F, Lawrence David S, Loyse Angela, Kanyama Cecilia, Heyderman Robert S, Lai Wai Shing, Mfinanga Sayoki, Lesikari Sokoine, Chanda Duncan, Kouanfack Charles, Temfack Elvis, Lortholary Olivier, Hosseinipour Mina C, Chan Adrienne K, Meya David B, Boulware David R, Mwandumba Henry C, Meintjes Graeme, Muzoora Conrad, Mosepele Mosepele, Ndhlovu Chiratidzo E, Youssouf Nabila, Harrison Thomas S, Jarvis Joseph N, Gupta Rishi K
Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
Centre for Global Health, Institute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's University of London, London, UK.
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 May;13(5):e920-e930. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00010-5.
Cryptococcal meningitis is a major driver of global HIV-related mortality, and validated approaches to stratify mortality risk could help to target effective treatment strategies. We aimed to develop and validate models to predict risk of all-cause mortality in people with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan African countries.
For this prediction modelling study, we pooled individual-level data from the ACTA (ISRCTN45035509) and AMBITION-cm (ISRCTN72509687) randomised controlled trials. Data in ACTA were collected between Feb 12, 2013, and Jan 10, 2017, and data in AMBITION-cm were collected between Jan 31, 2018, and June 11, 2021. Adults aged 18 years or older with a first episode of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis were recruited to both trials. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or lactation; receipt of high-dose anti-fungal treatment doses before screening; and contraindications to trial medication. Participants were recruited from nine hospitals across Cameroon, Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia in ACTA and eight hospitals across Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe in AMBITION-cm. We developed two primary multivariable logistic-regression models for the primary outcome of 2-week mortality: a basic model for use in a resource-limited setting that contained only candidate predictors that are routinely, programmatically obtained at hospital admission and a research model for which all predefined candidate predictors were considered for inclusion. We used internal-external cross-validation to evaluate model performance across countries within the development cohort (ie, data from all countries except Malawi participants in AMBITION-cm), before validation of discrimination, calibration, and net benefit in held-out data from Malawi.
We included 674 eligible participants from ACTA and 814 from AMBITION-cm in the pooled analysis (total sample size 1488). 1263 participants were included in model development, with 225 from the Malawi site in AMBITION-cm held out for validation. 222 (17·6%) of 1263 participants in the development set and 21 (9·3%) of 225 participants in the validation set met the primary model outcome of 2-week mortality. We retained five predictors in the basic model and seven in the research model. Predictors in both models were Glasgow Coma Scale score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, haemoglobin, blood neutrophil count, and treatment. Additional predictors in the research model were cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure and log10 cerebrospinal fluid quantitative cryptococcal culture. Discrimination was relatively consistent between study sites for both models (pooled C statistic 0·75 [95% CI 0·68-0·82] for the basic model and 0·78 [0·75-0·82] for the research model), but calibration was more heterogeneous (pooled calibration slope 0·87 [95% CI 0·57 to 1·17] and 0·83 [0·69 to 0·97], pooled calibration in the large 0·00 [-0·54 to 0·55] and -0·02 [-0·46 to 0·42], for the basic and research models, respectively). In held-out validation, discrimination of both models was slightly higher than estimates from internal-external cross-validation (C statistic 0·78 [95% CI 0·70-0·87] in the basic model and 0·85 [0·79-0·92] in the research model). Calibration assessment suggested overestimation of risk, particularly in the high-risk range: calibration slope 1·04 (95% CI 0·54 to 1·55), calibration in the large -0·55 (-1·02 to -0·07). When comparing single, high-dose liposomal amphotericin B plus 14 days of flucytosine plus fluconazole with 1 week of amphotericin B plus flucytosine in AMBITION-cm, hazard ratios were 0·50 (95% CI 0·26-0·97) in the low-risk stratum and 0·96 (0·67-1·37) in the high-risk stratum for the basic model, and 0·61 (0·31-1·18) in the low-risk stratum and 1·03 (0·72-1·47) in the high-risk stratum for the research model.
Both models accurately predicted 2-week mortality in people with HIV and have the potential to be incorporated into future treatment-stratification approaches in low-income and middle-income countries.
National Institute for Health Research.
隐球菌性脑膜炎是全球与艾滋病相关死亡的主要原因,有效的死亡风险分层方法有助于制定有效的治疗策略。我们旨在开发并验证模型,以预测撒哈拉以南非洲国家艾滋病相关隐球菌性脑膜炎患者的全因死亡风险。
在这项预测模型研究中,我们汇总了ACTA(ISRCTN45035509)和AMBITION-cm(ISRCTN72509687)随机对照试验的个体层面数据。ACTA的数据收集于2013年2月12日至2017年1月10日,AMBITION-cm的数据收集于2018年1月31日至2021年6月11日。两项试验均招募了年龄在18岁及以上、首次发生艾滋病相关隐球菌性脑膜炎的成年人。排除标准包括妊娠或哺乳期;筛查前接受高剂量抗真菌治疗;以及试验药物的禁忌证。ACTA研究从喀麦隆、马拉维、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚的9家医院招募参与者,AMBITION-cm研究从博茨瓦纳、马拉维、南非、乌干达和津巴布韦的8家医院招募参与者。我们针对2周死亡率这一主要结局开发了两个主要的多变量逻辑回归模型:一个用于资源有限环境的基础模型,该模型仅包含在入院时常规、按程序获取的候选预测因素;另一个是研究模型,所有预定义的候选预测因素均被考虑纳入。在对马拉维留存数据的区分度、校准度和净效益进行验证之前,我们采用内部-外部交叉验证来评估开发队列中各国模型的性能(即来自AMBITION-cm中除马拉维参与者之外所有国家的数据)。
在汇总分析中,我们纳入了来自ACTA的674名合格参与者和来自AMBITION-cm的814名参与者(总样本量1488)。1263名参与者纳入模型开发,AMBITION-cm中马拉维站点的225名参与者留存用于验证。在开发集中的1263名参与者中有222名(17.6%)、在验证集中的225名参与者中有21名(9.3%)达到了2周死亡率这一主要模型结局。基础模型保留了5个预测因素,研究模型保留了7个预测因素。两个模型中的预测因素均为格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态、血红蛋白、血液中性粒细胞计数和治疗。研究模型中的其他预测因素为脑脊液开放压和log10脑脊液定量隐球菌培养。两个模型在各研究站点之间的区分度相对一致(基础模型的合并C统计量为0.75 [95%CI 0.68 - 0.82],研究模型为0.78 [0.75 - 0.82]),但校准度的异质性更大(基础模型的合并校准斜率为0.87 [95%CI 0.57至1.17],研究模型为0.83 [0.69至0.97];基础模型和研究模型在大样本中的合并校准分别为0.00 [-0.54至0.55]和-0.02 [-0.46至0.42])。在留存验证中,两个模型的区分度略高于内部-外部交叉验证的估计值(基础模型的C统计量为0.78 [95%CI 0.70 - 0.87],研究模型为0.85 [0.79 - 0.92])。校准评估表明风险被高估,尤其是在高风险范围内:校准斜率为1.04(95%CI 0.54至1.55),大样本中的校准为-0.55(-1.02至-0.07)。在AMBITION-cm中,将单次高剂量脂质体两性霉素B加14天氟胞嘧啶加氟康唑与1周两性霉素B加氟胞嘧啶进行比较时,基础模型在低风险层的风险比为0.50(95%CI 0.26 - 0.97),在高风险层为0.96(0.67 - 1.37);研究模型在低风险层的风险比为0.61(0.31 - 1.18),在高风险层为1.03(0.72 - 1.47)。
两个模型均能准确预测艾滋病患者的2周死亡率,并且有可能被纳入未来低收入和中等收入国家治疗分层方法中。
英国国家卫生研究院。