• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处理科研不端行为案件中的多机构管辖权问题。

Managing Multi-Institutional Jurisdiction in Cases of Research Misconduct.

作者信息

Thornton Leslie, Cohen Devin, Barnes Mark, Bierer Barbara E

机构信息

Ropes & Gray LLC, Boston MA and Los AngelesCA.

Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, BostonMA.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 28:1-6. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.36.

DOI:10.1017/jme.2025.36
PMID:40289537
Abstract

Multi-institutional scientific research projects are increasingly common. Nevertheless, regulations and guidelines do not yet adequately address which entity should assume responsibility for research misconduct proceedings in multi-institutional research. This article explores the challenges of determining jurisdictional roles in research misconduct matters in collaborative science and proposes the application of a "jurisdictional interests test" as a framework for determining jurisdiction in multi-institutional research misconduct proceedings.

摘要

多机构科研项目越来越普遍。然而,法规和指南尚未充分解决在多机构研究中应由哪个实体对研究不当行为程序负责的问题。本文探讨了在合作科研中确定研究不当行为事件管辖权角色的挑战,并提出应用“管辖权利益测试”作为确定多机构研究不当行为程序管辖权的框架。

相似文献

1
Managing Multi-Institutional Jurisdiction in Cases of Research Misconduct.处理科研不端行为案件中的多机构管辖权问题。
J Law Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 28:1-6. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.36.
2
Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.采用掠夺性做法的期刊正在系统性地侵蚀科学精神:一种减少其运营空间并恢复研究最佳实践的把关与编码策略。
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70180. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70180.
3
An Occupational Science Contribution to Camouflaging Scholarship: Centering Intersectional Experiences of Occupational Disruptions.职业科学对伪装学术的贡献:以职业中断的交叉经历为中心
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):238-248. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0070. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Identifying and counteracting fraudulent responses in online recruitment for health research: a scoping review.识别和应对健康研究在线招募中的欺诈性回复:一项范围综述
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 20;30(3):173-182. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113170.
5
Peer researchers in NHS research: approved in principle, undermined in practice?英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)研究中的同行研究者:原则上获批,实践中却受到破坏?
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00708-0.
6
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
7
Defamation Claims Arising from Research Misconduct Cases: Best Practices for Institutions.研究 misconduct 案件引发的诽谤索赔:机构的最佳实践。 (注:misconduct 常见释义为“不当行为” ,这里“研究 misconduct”结合语境推测可能是“研究不当行为” ,但原英文中该词含义不太明确)
J Law Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 21:1-8. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.37.
8
SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0.SNMMI脑部[F]FDG PET成像程序标准/EANM实践指南,第2.0版。
J Nucl Med. 2024 Oct 17. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268754.
9
Integrating Antiracism and Life Course Frameworks in Research with Autistic Minority Transition-Aged Youth and Young Adults.在针对少数族裔自闭症过渡年龄青年和年轻人的研究中整合反种族主义和生命历程框架。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):229-237. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0088. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
A Mental Health Care Setting as a Clinical Exposure Site for Interprofessional Education: a Qualitative Study.作为跨专业教育临床实践场所的精神卫生保健机构:一项定性研究。
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 May 30;59(6):110-119. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9523. eCollection 2025.