Sandhu Geeta, Gordon Evangeline Armstrong, Adattini Josephine, O'Neill Niamh, Chambers Pinkie, Johnson David W, Kelly Aisling, Liauw Winston, Mallett Andrew J, Michael Michael, Mirkov Sanja, Scuderi Carla, Shingleton Julia, Siderov Jim, Sprangers Ben, Stein Brian N, Tunnicliffe David J, Ward Robyn L
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
eviQ, Cancer Institute NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 25;82:103101. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103101. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Reduced kidney function (or kidney dysfunction) is commonly an exclusion criterion for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer. Consequently, high quality evidence for anticancer drug dosing in reduced kidney function is limited and no internationally agreed guidelines exist to inform prescribing decisions in this population. A methodology for guideline development was applied which did not require availability of RCTs but used critical appraisal of existing observational literature and group consensus. An international multidisciplinary working group (n = 38) established consensus recommendations in two parts to form the International Consensus Guideline on Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD). The approach enabled virtual participation worldwide. In Part 1 we developed a standardised approach for assessment and classification of kidney function in patients with cancer using global nephrology standards and working group expertise. Part 2 involved a comprehensive literature search of 59 anticancer drugs followed by a critical appraisal of the evidence certainty through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) process and development of dosing recommendations in reduced kidney function. Key external stakeholders (n = 9) invited expert contributors (n = 25), and the working group participated in virtual interactive workshops to vote on the acceptability of these recommendations. The participants were provided with evaluation of the literature, and they engaged in several rounds of virtual discussion (involving robustness of the evidence behind recommendations and their real-world application) and anonymous consensus voting. Adapting the ADDIKD guideline development process to a virtual format enabled engagement with a very broad base of specialised international experts especially during the global pandemic. Combining GRADE methodology with consensus-building approaches was an effective method of producing recommendations (in an area lacking RCTs) by merging critical review of the literature with expert opinion and clinical practice.
Development of the ADDIKD guideline is funded by the Cancer Institute NSW as part of the NSW Government and received no funding from external commercial sources.
肾功能减退(或肾功能不全)通常是癌症随机对照试验(RCT)的排除标准。因此,关于肾功能减退患者抗癌药物给药的高质量证据有限,且不存在国际公认的指南来指导该人群的处方决策。应用了一种指南制定方法,该方法不需要RCT,但使用对现有观察性文献的批判性评价和小组共识。一个国际多学科工作组(n = 38)分两部分制定了共识性建议,以形成《肾功能不全患者抗癌药物给药国际共识指南》(ADDIKD)。该方法使全球范围内的虚拟参与成为可能。在第一部分中,我们利用全球肾脏病学标准和工作组专业知识,开发了一种用于评估和分类癌症患者肾功能的标准化方法。第二部分涉及对59种抗癌药物进行全面的文献检索,随后通过推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)过程对证据确定性进行批判性评价,并制定肾功能减退时的给药建议。主要外部利益相关者(n = 9)邀请了专家贡献者(n = 25),工作组参加了虚拟互动研讨会,对这些建议的可接受性进行投票。为参与者提供了文献评价,他们进行了几轮虚拟讨论(涉及建议背后证据的稳健性及其实际应用)和匿名共识投票。将ADDIKD指南制定过程调整为虚拟形式,使得能够与非常广泛的国际专家群体进行互动,尤其是在全球大流行期间。将GRADE方法与共识建立方法相结合,是通过将文献的批判性评价与专家意见和临床实践相结合,在缺乏RCT的领域产生建议的有效方法。
ADDIKD指南的制定由新南威尔士州癌症研究所作为新南威尔士州政府的一部分提供资金,未接受外部商业来源的资金。