Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?
作者信息
Tobias Deirdre K, Wittenbecher Clemens, Hu Frank B
机构信息
Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
出版信息
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1385-1387. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab124.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?营养证据分级：下一步何去何从？
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1385-1387. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab124.
2
Perspective: USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Methodology: Grading the Strength of Evidence in Nutrition- and Public Health-Related Systematic Reviews.观点：美国农业部营养证据系统评价方法学：对营养和公共卫生相关系统评价中证据强度进行分级。
Adv Nutr. 2022 Aug 1;13(4):982-991. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab147.
3
Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study.观察性营养流行病学系统评价和荟萃分析的特征和质量：一项横断面研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1578-1592. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab002.
4
Hard facts and misfits: essential ingredients of public health nutrition research.硬事实和不适配者：公共卫生营养研究的必要成分。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2021 Aug;80(3):373-381. doi: 10.1017/S0029665121000574. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
A systematic review of the nutritional status of adults experiencing homelessness.一项对无家可归成年人营养状况的系统评价。
Public Health. 2022 Jul;208:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
6
Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.方法：可信的营养推荐 NutriRECS（由系统评价组成的营养推荐和可获取的证据摘要）：一项方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0621-8.
7
Post-pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in critically ill adults.幽门后喂养与胃管喂养对预防重症成年患者肺炎及改善营养结局的比较
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Apr-Jun;31(2):96-98. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Association between Malnutrition Assessed by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria and Mortality in Older People: A Scoping Review.全球营养不良倡议标准评估的营养不良与老年人死亡率的关系：范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;20(7):5320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075320.
9
Nutritional determinants of frailty in older adults: A systematic review.老年人衰弱的营养决定因素：一项系统综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 May 15;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0496-2.
10
Contribution to the Journal Ciência & Saúde Coletiva on Food and Nutrition in Brazil.对巴西食品与营养领域的《 Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 杂志》的贡献。
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Dec;25(12):4863-4874. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320202512.16732020. Epub 2020 May 28.
引用本文的文献
1
Prioritising viral hepatitis elimination to prevent hepatocellular carcinoma: A public health approach for effective preventive hepatology.优先消除病毒性肝炎以预防肝细胞癌：有效预防肝病学的公共卫生方法。
JHEP Rep. 2025 May 2;7(8):101436. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101436. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney function.一种用于确定肾功能减退患者抗癌药物给药建议的方法。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 25;82:103101. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103101. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Mediterranean Dietary Pattern for Healthy and Active Aging: A Narrative Review of an Integrative and Sustainable Approach.地中海饮食模式促进健康活跃老龄化：一种综合与可持续方法的综合述评。
Nutrients. 2024 May 31;16(11):1725. doi: 10.3390/nu16111725.
4
Health effects of drinking 100% juice: an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses.饮用100%果汁对健康的影响：一项包含荟萃分析的系统评价的伞状综述
Nutr Rev. 2025 Feb 1;83(2):e722-e735. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae036.
5
Need for a nutrition-specific scientific paradigm for research quality improvement.需要一种针对营养的科学范式以提高研究质量。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2023 Jul 14;6(2):383-391. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000650. eCollection 2023.
6
A Primer on Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Diabetes Research.糖尿病研究中系统评价和荟萃分析基础。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Nov 1;46(11):1882-1893. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0031.
7
Nuts and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: A Review of the Evidence and Future Directions.坚果与心血管疾病结局：证据回顾与未来方向。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 11;15(4):911. doi: 10.3390/nu15040911.
8
Using the Hierarchies of Evidence Applied to Lifestyle Medicine (HEALM) Approach to Assess the Strength of Evidence on Associations between Dietary Patterns and All-Cause Mortality.运用适用于生活方式医学（HEALM）的证据层级方法评估饮食模式与全因死亡率之间关联的证据强度。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 17;14(20):4340. doi: 10.3390/nu14204340.
9
Evidence Use in the Development of the Australian Dietary Guidelines: A Qualitative Study.证据在澳大利亚膳食指南制定中的应用：一项定性研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Oct 23;13(11):3748. doi: 10.3390/nu13113748.
10
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Portion Size and Ingestive Frequency on Energy Intake and Body Weight among Adults in Randomized Controlled Feeding Trials.系统评价和荟萃分析：随机对照喂养试验中，食物份量和摄食频率对成年人能量摄入和体重的影响。
Adv Nutr. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):248-268. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab112.
本文引用的文献
1
Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study.观察性营养流行病学系统评价和荟萃分析的特征和质量：一项横断面研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1578-1592. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab002.
2
Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.在公共卫生指南和系统评价中应用 GRADE 方法的挑战：来自 GRADE 公共卫生组的概念文章。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
4
Red and Processed Meats and Health Risks: How Strong Is the Evidence?红肉类和加工肉类与健康风险：证据有多大力度？
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):265-271. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0063.
5
Red and processed meat: more with less?红肉和加工肉类：多吃还是少吃？
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Feb 1;111(2):252-255. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz294.
6
Hierarchies of evidence applied to lifestyle Medicine (HEALM): introduction of a strength-of-evidence approach based on a methodological systematic review.证据层级在生活方式医学中的应用（HEALM）：基于方法学系统评价的证据强度评估方法的引入。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 20;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0811-z.
7
Role of diet in type 2 diabetes incidence: umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective observational studies.饮食在 2 型糖尿病发病中的作用：对前瞻性观察研究荟萃分析的伞状评价。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 3;366:l2368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2368.
8
GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.GRADE 指南：18. ROBINS-I 及其他评估非随机研究偏倚风险的工具应如何用于评估证据体的确定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
The Misuse of Meta-analysis in Nutrition Research.营养研究中荟萃分析的滥用
JAMA. 2017 Oct 17;318(15):1435-1436. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12083.
10
Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.食物类别与全因死亡率风险：前瞻性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1462-1473. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.153148. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Zotero 插件