Narang Ved, McGlone Megan, Calder Nick
Department of Ear, Nose, Throat, Head, and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland.
University of Glasgow Medical School, Wolfson Medical School Building, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr 15;29(2):1-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1801313. eCollection 2025 Apr.
We previously investigated the impact of video clinics on the management of closed nasal bone injuries during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of that study was to assess the feasibility of managing patients at their homes or workplaces, with instructions to attend outpatient clinics the next working day if they suspected any deviation or reduced nasal airflow, for further evaluation. To compare the results of our previous research with the traditional, in-person nasal injury clinics, using the same criteria as in our prior investigation. We analyzed 3 months of preexisting data from video clinics and collected 6 months of data from face-to-face clinics. We gathered information on the number of patients, categorized by age and gender, as well as records of missed appointments (DNAs) and the requirement for nasal manipulations. Data analysis was conducted using the Chi-Squared test in SciPy Python 3.0 (open source). The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning the number of patients with closed nasal bone injuries, both under and over 18 years of age ( -value: 0.961), the rate of missed appointments ( -value: 0.0734), and the need for fracture reduction ( -value: 0.0734). The findings suggest that video clinics are equally effective in managing suspected nasal bone injuries and should not be restricted to emergency situations. However, it is advisable to adopt a balanced approach considering the additional costs associated with appointments.
我们之前研究了视频诊疗对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间闭合性鼻骨损伤管理的影响。该研究的目的是评估在患者家中或工作场所对其进行管理的可行性,并指示他们如果怀疑有任何偏差或鼻气流减少,在下一个工作日到门诊就诊,以便进一步评估。
为了将我们之前的研究结果与传统的面对面鼻损伤诊疗进行比较,采用与我们之前调查相同的标准。
我们分析了视频诊疗3个月的现有数据,并收集了面对面诊疗6个月的数据。我们收集了按年龄和性别分类的患者数量信息,以及失约记录(未到诊)和鼻骨整复需求的记录。使用SciPy Python 3.0(开源)中的卡方检验进行数据分析。
统计分析显示,两组在18岁及以下和18岁以上闭合性鼻骨损伤患者数量、失约率(P值:0.0734)和骨折复位需求(P值:图0.0734)方面均无显著差异。
研究结果表明,视频诊疗在管理疑似鼻骨损伤方面同样有效,不应仅限于紧急情况。然而,考虑到与预约相关的额外成本,建议采取平衡的方法。