• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经心理学测试期间的认知活动会引发癫痫发作吗?

Do cognitive activities during neuropsychological testing trigger seizures?

作者信息

Wismeth Sophia, Badr Mostafa, Helmstaedter Christoph, Witt Juri-Alexander, Surges Rainer

机构信息

Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2025 Aug;66(8):2930-2940. doi: 10.1111/epi.18429. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1111/epi.18429
PMID:40293067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12371627/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have suggested that stress precipitates seizures and that cognitive exertion may increase brain excitability, thereby possibly contributing to seizure occurrence during neuropsychological examinations. The present study investigates whether specific, standardized cognitive activities are linked to seizure occurrence.

METHODS

Two thousand neuropsychological examinations including the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT) and Diagnosticum für Cerebralschädigung-Revised (DCS-R) were retrospectively evaluated, and occurrence of seizures during neuropsychological testing was assessed. In addition, patient characteristics and epilepsy features were collected from electronic patient charts. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test and linear mixed regression models.

RESULTS

Data of 1444 patients (age = 46 ± 17 years, 48% female) were included in the study, of whom 95% displayed focal epilepsy. Seizures occurred in 36 (1.8%) of 2000 neuropsychological examinations in 34 (2.4%) of the 1444 patients. Test-related seizures were observed only in patients with focal epilepsy, predominantly during memory tests (58%) and most frequently during VLMT (33.3%) and DCS-R (19.4%). A significant association was found between seizure occurrence during VLMT and a seizure onset zone in the right and left temporal lobe, whereas no such association was identified with seizures occurring during DCS-R. No other features were linked with seizure occurrence during testing.

SIGNIFICANCE

The occurrence of seizures during neuropsychological examinations is very rare. Our data do not support the notion that specific cognitive activities favor acute onset of seizures but rather suggest a coincidental relationship.

摘要

目的

以往研究表明,压力会诱发癫痫发作,认知活动可能会增加大脑兴奋性,从而可能导致在神经心理学检查期间癫痫发作。本研究调查特定的、标准化的认知活动是否与癫痫发作有关。

方法

回顾性评估了包括言语学习和记忆测试(VLMT)和修订版脑损伤诊断量表(DCS-R)在内的2000次神经心理学检查,并评估了神经心理学测试期间癫痫发作的情况。此外,还从电子病历中收集了患者特征和癫痫特征。使用卡方检验和线性混合回归模型进行统计分析。

结果

1444例患者(年龄=46±17岁,48%为女性)的数据纳入研究,其中95%表现为局灶性癫痫。在2000次神经心理学检查中,36次(1.8%)出现癫痫发作,1444例患者中有34例(2.4%)出现癫痫发作。仅在局灶性癫痫患者中观察到与测试相关的癫痫发作,主要发生在记忆测试期间(58%),最常见于VLMT(33.3%)和DCS-R(19.4%)期间。发现VLMT期间癫痫发作与左右颞叶癫痫发作起始区之间存在显著关联,而DCS-R期间癫痫发作未发现此类关联。测试期间癫痫发作与其他特征无关。

意义

神经心理学检查期间癫痫发作的情况非常罕见。我们的数据不支持特定认知活动有利于癫痫急性发作的观点,而是表明两者之间是一种偶然关系。

相似文献

1
Do cognitive activities during neuropsychological testing trigger seizures?神经心理学测试期间的认知活动会引发癫痫发作吗?
Epilepsia. 2025 Aug;66(8):2930-2940. doi: 10.1111/epi.18429. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Idiopathic (Genetic) Generalized Epilepsy特发性(遗传性)全身性癫痫
3
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
4
Surgery for epilepsy.癫痫手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD010541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010541.pub2.
5
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.
6
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英钠单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.
7
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
8
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯巴比妥单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:一项个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD001904. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001904.pub3.
9
The Effects of Cenobamate and Its Dosage on Cognition: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in 84 Individuals with Epilepsy.司替戊醇及其剂量对认知的影响:一项针对84例癫痫患者的回顾性纵向研究。
CNS Drugs. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01196-2.
10
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Trends and Innovative Therapies in Epilepsy Management.癫痫管理的新兴趋势与创新疗法综合综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;13(9):1305. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091305.
2
Cognitive Impairment in People with Epilepsy.癫痫患者的认知障碍
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 5;11(1):267. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010267.
3
The Right Hemisphere Is Responsible for the Greatest Differences in Human Brain Response to High-Arousing Emotional versus Neutral Stimuli: A MEG Study.右半球在人类大脑对高唤醒情绪刺激与中性刺激的反应中差异最大:一项脑磁图研究
Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 21;11(8):960. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11080960.
4
Genetic generalized and focal epilepsy prevalence in the North American SUDEP Registry.北美 SUDEP 注册中心的遗传性全面性和局灶性癫痫患病率。
Neurology. 2020 Apr 21;94(16):e1757-e1763. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009295. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Treated With Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs: A 30-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.新诊断癫痫患者使用现有和新型抗癫痫药物治疗的治疗结局:一项长达 30 年的纵向队列研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):279-286. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3949.
6
Epilepsy and cognition - A bidirectional relationship?癫痫与认知——一种双向关系?
Seizure. 2017 Jul;49:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Relation between stress-precipitated seizures and the stress response in childhood epilepsy.儿童癫痫中应激诱发癫痫发作与应激反应的关系。
Brain. 2015 Aug;138(Pt 8):2234-48. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv157. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
8
Characteristics of people with self-reported stress-precipitated seizures.自我报告有应激诱发癫痫发作的人群特征。
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Dec;41:74-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
9
ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy.ILAE 官方报告:癫痫的实用临床定义。
Epilepsia. 2014 Apr;55(4):475-82. doi: 10.1111/epi.12550. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
10
Acute provoked reflex seizures induced by thinking.由思维诱发的急性反射性癫痫发作。
Neurologist. 2012 Nov;18(6):415-7. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31827450c9.