Suppr超能文献

癫痫与认知——一种双向关系?

Epilepsy and cognition - A bidirectional relationship?

作者信息

Helmstaedter Christoph, Witt Juri-Alexander

机构信息

Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Seizure. 2017 Jul;49:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Abstract

Cognitive comorbidities are very common in epilepsy and often seen as secondary to epilepsy or caused by epilepsy. The implicit and sometimes explicit assumption is that epilepsy (i.e. having seizures) damages the brain and thus leads to functional deterioration and behavioral alterations. This article highlights the historical background surrounding this viewpoint which is characterized by old reports on 'epileptic dementia' and the fact that most cognitive research in chronic epilepsies is done retrospectively. The central question of the present article is whether there is a bidirectional relationship between epilepsy and cognition. In this regard it is essential to disentangle what is the disease and what is the symptom. Cognitive problems often exist from the onset of epilepsy, if not before, and the impact of epilepsy on cognition cannot be discerned without also considering the underlying brain pathology and its dynamics. Unraveling the etiologies of epilepsy increasingly reveals conditions wherein epilepsy, cognitive and behavioral problems are all symptoms of a common underlying pathological condition. Functional reserve capacities determine the outcome of epilepsy and its treatment. A functional interrelationship exists between epilepsy and behavior, since epileptic activity can affect behavior and behavior can alter epileptic activity. In conclusion, an epilepsy-centric unidirectional view of the behavioral problems being caused by epilepsy is obsolete. Such a view may even prevent the search for and treatment of the underlying etiological factors. Instead a practical clinical approach is favored according to which the comorbidities of epilepsy must be diagnosed at the onset of the disease, and according to which comorbidities may require separate treatment approaches.

摘要

认知共病在癫痫中非常常见,通常被视为癫痫的继发性表现或由癫痫引起。一种隐含甚至有时明确的假设是,癫痫(即发作)会损害大脑,从而导致功能衰退和行为改变。本文着重介绍了这一观点的历史背景,其特点是有关于“癫痫性痴呆”的旧报告,以及慢性癫痫的大多数认知研究都是回顾性进行的这一事实。本文的核心问题是癫痫与认知之间是否存在双向关系。在这方面,区分什么是疾病、什么是症状至关重要。认知问题往往在癫痫发作时就已存在,即便不是在此之前,如果不考虑潜在的脑病理学及其动态变化,就无法辨别癫痫对认知的影响。对癫痫病因的深入研究越来越多地揭示出这样一些情况,即癫痫、认知和行为问题都是一种共同潜在病理状况的症状。功能储备能力决定了癫痫及其治疗的结果。癫痫与行为之间存在功能上的相互关系,因为癫痫活动会影响行为,行为也会改变癫痫活动。总之,以癫痫为中心、认为行为问题由癫痫引起的单向观点已过时。这种观点甚至可能阻碍对潜在病因的探寻和治疗。相反,一种实用的临床方法更受青睐,即必须在疾病发作时就诊断出癫痫的共病情况,而且共病情况可能需要采用不同的治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验