Spence Kimberley, Dowling Nicki A, Browne Matthew, Rockloff Matthew, Merkouris Stephanie S, Dias Stephanie E
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.
School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, 6 University Dr, Branyan, Bundaberg, QLD, 4670, Australia.
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10388-w.
Gambling-related harm can extend to family members, friends, and communities, however few population-representative studies explore affected other (AO) attributable harm measured with direct reference to gambling. Moreover, no study has employed the full 68-item Gambling Checklist for AOs to investigate harm according to the domains of harm outlined in a recent comprehensive harms taxonomy. Using data from a subsample of 197 AOs identified via a population-representative sample of 5000 respondents from the Fourth Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling in Tasmania, this study employed a mixed-method design aiming to: (1) quantitatively estimate the rates of AO harms across each domain of harm; and (2) qualitatively analyse semi-structured interview data in a subset of 20 AOs to explore their lived experience of these harms. Overall, emotional/ psychological harm was the most commonly reported (90.36%, 95% CI: 85.32%, 93.79%), followed by relationship harm (75.63%, 95% CI: 69.10%, 81.17%), financial harm (60.91%, 95% CI: 53.87%, 67.53%), health harm (58.67%, 95% CI: 51.59%, 65.41%), work or study harm (32.63%, 95% CI: 26.29%, 39.68%), and other harm (19.17%, 95% CI: 14.18%, 25.40%). The qualitative narratives revealed the interconnected vulnerabilities experienced by AOs across the broad domains of harm. The findings emphasise the importance of targeted interventions, public health promotion, and comprehensive support services to address the diverse harms to AOs. Key areas for intervention include psychological and emotional support, financial guidance, and raising awareness to facilitate early detection of stress-related health conditions, with collaboration between services crucial for developing integrated support systems.
与赌博相关的危害可能会波及家庭成员、朋友和社区,但很少有具有人口代表性的研究探讨直接参照赌博来衡量的受影响他人(AO)可归因危害。此外,没有研究使用完整的68项AO赌博清单,根据最近一份全面的危害分类法中概述的危害领域来调查危害情况。本研究利用来自塔斯马尼亚赌博的第四次社会和经济影响研究中5000名受访者的具有人口代表性样本所确定的197名AO子样本的数据,采用了混合方法设计,旨在:(1)定量估计各危害领域的AO危害发生率;(2)对20名AO子集中的半结构化访谈数据进行定性分析,以探索他们这些危害的生活经历。总体而言,情感/心理危害是最常报告的(90.36%,95%置信区间:85.32%,93.79%),其次是关系危害(75.63%,95%置信区间:69.10%,81.17%)、经济危害(60.91%,95%置信区间:53.87%,67.53%)、健康危害(58.67%,95%置信区间:51.59%,65.41%)、工作或学习危害(32.63%,95%置信区间:26.29%,39.68%)和其他危害(19.17%,95%置信区间:14.18%,25.40%)。定性叙述揭示了AO在广泛危害领域中经历的相互关联的脆弱性。研究结果强调了有针对性的干预、公共卫生促进和全面支持服务对于解决AO所遭受的各种危害的重要性。关键干预领域包括心理和情感支持、财务指导,以及提高认识以促进对与压力相关的健康状况的早期发现,各服务之间的合作对于建立综合支持系统至关重要。