• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety netting advice for acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care: exploring parents' opinions, ideas, and expectations through focus group interviews.针对前来门诊治疗的急症患儿的安全网建议:通过焦点小组访谈探索家长的意见、想法和期望
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 28;26(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02803-3.
2
Towards an international consensus on safety netting advice for acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care: a modified e-Delphi procedure.为急性病患儿在门诊就诊时提供安全网建议达成国际共识:改良后的电子德尔菲法。
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Jan 22;109(2):93-99. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326370.
3
The safety netting behaviour of first contact clinicians: a qualitative study.首诊临床医生的安全网行为:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 25;14:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-140.
4
How do general practitioners use 'safety netting' in acutely ill children?全科医生如何在急症患儿中运用“安全网”措施?
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1092516. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
5
The experiences of acute non-surgical pain of children who present to a healthcare facility for treatment: a systematic review protocol.前往医疗机构接受治疗的儿童急性非手术疼痛经历:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):12-20. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2466.
6
Helping parents know when to seek help for an acutely ill child: Evidence based co-development of a mobile phone app using complex intervention methodology.帮助父母了解何时为急性病患儿寻求帮助:使用复杂干预方法循证共同开发手机应用程序。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jul;187:105459. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105459. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Parents' information needs, self-efficacy and influences on consulting for childhood respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study.父母的信息需求、自我效能感及其对儿童呼吸道感染咨询的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jul 28;14:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-106.
8
Effectiveness of safety-netting approaches for acutely ill children: a network meta-analysis.针对急症患儿的安全网式方法的有效性:一项网状Meta分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):e90-e97. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0141. Print 2025 Feb.
9
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
10
Parents' help-seeking behaviours during acute childhood illness at home: A contribution to explanatory theory.父母在家中应对儿童急性疾病时的求助行为:对解释性理论的贡献。
J Child Health Care. 2016 Mar;20(1):77-86. doi: 10.1177/1367493514551309. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of safety-netting approaches for acutely ill children: a network meta-analysis.针对急症患儿的安全网式方法的有效性:一项网状Meta分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):e90-e97. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0141. Print 2025 Feb.
2
Supporting parents with acutely ill children: Environment scan and user evaluation of mobile applications (the SuPa kids project).支持急性病患儿的父母:移动应用程序的环境扫描和用户评估(SuPa kids 项目)。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Sep;189:105504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105504. Epub 2024 May 26.
3
Temporal trends in antibiotic prescribing and serious and nonserious infections in children presenting to general practice: a registry-based longitudinal cohort study of 162 507 individuals.在一般实践中为就诊的儿童开具抗生素处方和治疗严重及非严重感染的时间趋势:基于登记的 162507 名个体的纵向队列研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Jun 3;79(6):1397-1406. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae117.
4
Helping parents know when to seek help for an acutely ill child: Evidence based co-development of a mobile phone app using complex intervention methodology.帮助父母了解何时为急性病患儿寻求帮助:使用复杂干预方法循证共同开发手机应用程序。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jul;187:105459. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105459. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a modified grounded theory study.为患有严重传染病的幼儿导航不确定的疾病轨迹:一项修正的扎根理论研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08420-5.
6
Antibiotic use in ambulatory care for acutely ill children in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高收入国家中急性病儿童在门诊护理中使用抗生素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Dec;107(12):1088-1094. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324227. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Accuracy of the NICE traffic light system in children presenting to general practice: a retrospective cohort study.NICE 交通灯系统在普通科诊所就诊儿童中的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 May 26;72(719):e398-e404. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0633. Print 2022 Jun.
8
Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care.优化全科医生提供建议的沟通方式,以促进患者的自我护理,并在诊断不确定时及时进行随访:初级保健中“安全网”的实际审查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jul;31(7):541-554. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014529. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.2019 年全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
10
Gender in the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist.定性研究报告统一标准(COREQ)清单中的性别因素。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Oct 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab123.

针对前来门诊治疗的急症患儿的安全网建议:通过焦点小组访谈探索家长的意见、想法和期望

Safety netting advice for acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care: exploring parents' opinions, ideas, and expectations through focus group interviews.

作者信息

Burvenich Ruben, Heytens Stefan, Bos David A G, Van Roy Kaatje, Struyf Thomas, Toelen Jaan, De Sutter An, Verbakel Jan Y

机构信息

Leuven Unit for Health Technology Assessment Research (LUHTAR), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 7 Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.

Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, Ghent University, 10 Corneel Heymanslaan, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 28;26(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02803-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02803-3
PMID:40295955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12036273/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety netting advice (SNA) is an essential component of the management of acutely ill children in ambulatory care. However, healthcare professionals use a variety of SNA methods, leading to inconsistencies within and across organisations. Much research has explored the perspective on SNA of parents from the UK, but such research is lacking outside the UK context.

METHODS

We conducted focus groups with Belgian parents of children 6 months to 12 years old, who were recruited through maximum variation sampling. We transcribed the interviews verbatim. Using a combination of inductive and deductive 'in vivo' coding we developed themes from the data. As per the Grounded Theory approach, we reiterated between data collection, coding, and analysis. After participant validation of provisional themes, we constructed the final thematic framework.

RESULTS

Through six focus groups with 30 parents, we identified five themes: (1) Relevant background information; (2) To know what to expect, what to look out for; (3) Instructions on child homecare and when to revisit a physician; (4) Physicians who consider parents' perspectives and contexts; (5) A reliable source that provides SNA only when necessary, possibly in a multimodal way.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified five themes from Belgian parents' views on SNA, aligning with prior UK research. These findings form an evidence base for developing a consensus statement on the content and form of SNA supported by both parents and experts from high-income countries.

摘要

背景

安全网建议(SNA)是门诊急性病患儿管理的重要组成部分。然而,医疗保健专业人员使用多种SNA方法,导致组织内部和组织之间存在不一致。许多研究探讨了英国父母对SNA的看法,但在英国以外的背景下缺乏此类研究。

方法

我们对6个月至12岁儿童的比利时父母进行了焦点小组访谈,通过最大差异抽样招募。我们逐字转录了访谈内容。使用归纳和演绎的“现场”编码相结合的方法,我们从数据中提炼出主题。按照扎根理论方法,我们在数据收集、编码和分析之间反复进行。在参与者对初步主题进行验证后,我们构建了最终的主题框架。

结果

通过与30位父母进行的6个焦点小组访谈,我们确定了五个主题:(1)相关背景信息;(2)了解预期情况、注意事项;(3)儿童家庭护理及何时复诊的指导;(4)考虑父母观点和背景的医生;(5)仅在必要时以多模式方式提供SNA的可靠来源。

结论

我们从比利时父母对SNA的看法中确定了五个主题,与英国先前的研究一致。这些发现为制定一份关于SNA内容和形式的共识声明提供了证据基础,该声明得到高收入国家父母和专家的支持。