Burvenich Ruben, Heytens Stefan, Bos David A G, Van Roy Kaatje, Struyf Thomas, Toelen Jaan, De Sutter An, Verbakel Jan Y
Leuven Unit for Health Technology Assessment Research (LUHTAR), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 7 Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, Ghent University, 10 Corneel Heymanslaan, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 28;26(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02803-3.
Safety netting advice (SNA) is an essential component of the management of acutely ill children in ambulatory care. However, healthcare professionals use a variety of SNA methods, leading to inconsistencies within and across organisations. Much research has explored the perspective on SNA of parents from the UK, but such research is lacking outside the UK context.
We conducted focus groups with Belgian parents of children 6 months to 12 years old, who were recruited through maximum variation sampling. We transcribed the interviews verbatim. Using a combination of inductive and deductive 'in vivo' coding we developed themes from the data. As per the Grounded Theory approach, we reiterated between data collection, coding, and analysis. After participant validation of provisional themes, we constructed the final thematic framework.
Through six focus groups with 30 parents, we identified five themes: (1) Relevant background information; (2) To know what to expect, what to look out for; (3) Instructions on child homecare and when to revisit a physician; (4) Physicians who consider parents' perspectives and contexts; (5) A reliable source that provides SNA only when necessary, possibly in a multimodal way.
We identified five themes from Belgian parents' views on SNA, aligning with prior UK research. These findings form an evidence base for developing a consensus statement on the content and form of SNA supported by both parents and experts from high-income countries.
安全网建议(SNA)是门诊急性病患儿管理的重要组成部分。然而,医疗保健专业人员使用多种SNA方法,导致组织内部和组织之间存在不一致。许多研究探讨了英国父母对SNA的看法,但在英国以外的背景下缺乏此类研究。
我们对6个月至12岁儿童的比利时父母进行了焦点小组访谈,通过最大差异抽样招募。我们逐字转录了访谈内容。使用归纳和演绎的“现场”编码相结合的方法,我们从数据中提炼出主题。按照扎根理论方法,我们在数据收集、编码和分析之间反复进行。在参与者对初步主题进行验证后,我们构建了最终的主题框架。
通过与30位父母进行的6个焦点小组访谈,我们确定了五个主题:(1)相关背景信息;(2)了解预期情况、注意事项;(3)儿童家庭护理及何时复诊的指导;(4)考虑父母观点和背景的医生;(5)仅在必要时以多模式方式提供SNA的可靠来源。
我们从比利时父母对SNA的看法中确定了五个主题,与英国先前的研究一致。这些发现为制定一份关于SNA内容和形式的共识声明提供了证据基础,该声明得到高收入国家父母和专家的支持。