Haroen Hartiah, Maulana Sidik, Harun Hasniatisari, Mirwanti Ristina, Sari Citra Windani Mambang, Platini Hesti, Arovah Novita Intan, Padila Padila, Amirah Shakira, Pardosi Jerico Franciscus
Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno KM. 21, Jatinangor, West Java, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia.
Postgraduate Program of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia.
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 28;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01737-y.
Patients with cancer and their caregivers experience significant psychological, physical, and emotional burdens throughout the disease trajectory which reduces their quality of life (QoL). Early palliative care (EPC) has been proposed as a strategy to alleviate physical, psychological and emotional burdens and improve health outcomes. While evidence generally supports the benefits of EPC, variations in reported outcomes highlight the need for a deeper understanding of its impact across different patient populations and healthcare settings.
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the pooled effects of EPC on psychological, functional status, and QoL outcomes in both cancer patients and their caregivers. The secondary aim was to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients and their family caregivers.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Four databases, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane, were searched up to January 2024. This study included randomized controlled trial (RCT) and pilot-RCT studies reporting psychological outcomes (anxiety, depression), functional status, QoL, and satisfaction in cancer patients and their caregivers. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the short-term (< 24 weeks) versus long-term (≥ 24 weeks) effects of EPC. Mean differences (MD) and standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated using a fixed-effects model according to the Mantel-Haenszel model and a random-effects model according to the DerSimonian and Laird method.
A total of 24 studies met our inclusion criteria. For cancer patients, EPC significantly reduced anxiety (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.02; -0.23, p = 0.002) and improved QoL (SMD 0.13, 95%CI: 0.06; 0.19, p = 0.0004). However, there was no significant reduction in depression (SMD -0.15, 95% CI: -0.36; 0.05, p = 0.14) and improvement in functional status (MD = 2.14, 95% CI: -0.78; 5.06, p = 0.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that long-term EPC significantly reduced anxiety and depression while improving QoL, but had no significant effects on functional status. For caregivers, EPC did not significantly impact either physical or mental QoL (Short form/SF-36 physical: MD = 0.81, 95% CI: -0.46; 2.09, p = 0.21; SF-36 Mental: MD = 0.53, 95% CI: -1.03; 2.08, p = 0.51). Moreover, satisfaction was more likely to be higher in patients and their caregivers who received EPC than in those who received usual care (MD 2.45, 95% CI: 0.90; 4.01, p = 0.002, MD 4.09, 95% CI: 0.60; 7.58, p = 0.02, respectively).
EPC reduces long term psychological burden and improve QoL and care satisfaction experience among patients with cancer. Therefore, EPC should be more broadly introduced into cancer care earlier to address patient's psychological burdens.
癌症患者及其护理人员在整个疾病进程中经历着巨大的心理、身体和情感负担,这降低了他们的生活质量(QoL)。早期姑息治疗(EPC)已被提议作为减轻身体、心理和情感负担并改善健康结果的一种策略。虽然证据总体上支持EPC的益处,但报告结果的差异凸显了深入了解其在不同患者群体和医疗环境中的影响的必要性。
本研究的主要目的是评估EPC对癌症患者及其护理人员的心理、功能状态和生活质量结果的综合影响。次要目的是评估患者及其家庭护理人员的满意度。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。截至2024年1月,检索了四个数据库,即PubMed、Scopus、EBSCOhost和Cochrane。本研究纳入了报告癌症患者及其护理人员心理结果(焦虑、抑郁)、功能状态、生活质量和满意度的随机对照试验(RCT)和试点RCT研究。进行亚组分析以探讨EPC的短期(<24周)与长期(≥24周)效果。根据Mantel-Haenszel模型使用固定效应模型和根据DerSimonian和Laird方法使用随机效应模型计算平均差(MD)和标准平均差(SMD)。
共有24项研究符合我们的纳入标准。对于癌症患者,EPC显著降低了焦虑(MD = -0.62,95%CI:-1.02;-0.23,p = 0.002)并改善了生活质量(SMD 0.13,95%CI:0.06;0.19,p = 0.0004)。然而,抑郁没有显著降低(SMD -0.15,95%CI:-0.36;0.05,p = 0.14),功能状态也没有显著改善(MD = 2.14,95%CI:-0.78;5.06,p = 0.15)。亚组分析显示,长期EPC显著降低了焦虑和抑郁,同时改善了生活质量,但对功能状态没有显著影响。对于护理人员,EPC对身体或心理生活质量均无显著影响(简短形式/ SF-36身体:MD = 0.81,95%CI:-0.46;2.09,p = 0.21;SF-36心理:MD = 0.53,95%CI:-1.03;2.08,p = 0.51)。此外,接受EPC的患者及其护理人员比接受常规护理的患者及其护理人员更有可能具有更高的满意度(MD 2.45,95%CI:0.90;4.01,p = 0.002,MD 4.09,95%CI:0.60;7.58,p = 0.02)。
EPC减轻了癌症患者的长期心理负担,提高了生活质量和护理满意度体验。因此,应更早地将EPC更广泛地引入癌症护理中,以解决患者的心理负担。