• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期姑息治疗对癌症患者及其照顾者心理健康、功能状态和健康相关生活质量的益处:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The benefits of early palliative care on psychological well-being, functional status, and health-related quality of life among cancer patients and their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Haroen Hartiah, Maulana Sidik, Harun Hasniatisari, Mirwanti Ristina, Sari Citra Windani Mambang, Platini Hesti, Arovah Novita Intan, Padila Padila, Amirah Shakira, Pardosi Jerico Franciscus

机构信息

Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno KM. 21, Jatinangor, West Java, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia.

Postgraduate Program of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 28;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01737-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-025-01737-y
PMID:40296046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12036283/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer and their caregivers experience significant psychological, physical, and emotional burdens throughout the disease trajectory which reduces their quality of life (QoL). Early palliative care (EPC) has been proposed as a strategy to alleviate physical, psychological and emotional burdens and improve health outcomes. While evidence generally supports the benefits of EPC, variations in reported outcomes highlight the need for a deeper understanding of its impact across different patient populations and healthcare settings.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the pooled effects of EPC on psychological, functional status, and QoL outcomes in both cancer patients and their caregivers. The secondary aim was to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients and their family caregivers.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Four databases, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane, were searched up to January 2024. This study included randomized controlled trial (RCT) and pilot-RCT studies reporting psychological outcomes (anxiety, depression), functional status, QoL, and satisfaction in cancer patients and their caregivers. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the short-term (< 24 weeks) versus long-term (≥ 24 weeks) effects of EPC. Mean differences (MD) and standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated using a fixed-effects model according to the Mantel-Haenszel model and a random-effects model according to the DerSimonian and Laird method.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies met our inclusion criteria. For cancer patients, EPC significantly reduced anxiety (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.02; -0.23, p = 0.002) and improved QoL (SMD 0.13, 95%CI: 0.06; 0.19, p = 0.0004). However, there was no significant reduction in depression (SMD -0.15, 95% CI: -0.36; 0.05, p = 0.14) and improvement in functional status (MD = 2.14, 95% CI: -0.78; 5.06, p = 0.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that long-term EPC significantly reduced anxiety and depression while improving QoL, but had no significant effects on functional status. For caregivers, EPC did not significantly impact either physical or mental QoL (Short form/SF-36 physical: MD = 0.81, 95% CI: -0.46; 2.09, p = 0.21; SF-36 Mental: MD = 0.53, 95% CI: -1.03; 2.08, p = 0.51). Moreover, satisfaction was more likely to be higher in patients and their caregivers who received EPC than in those who received usual care (MD 2.45, 95% CI: 0.90; 4.01, p = 0.002, MD 4.09, 95% CI: 0.60; 7.58, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

EPC reduces long term psychological burden and improve QoL and care satisfaction experience among patients with cancer. Therefore, EPC should be more broadly introduced into cancer care earlier to address patient's psychological burdens.

摘要

背景

癌症患者及其护理人员在整个疾病进程中经历着巨大的心理、身体和情感负担,这降低了他们的生活质量(QoL)。早期姑息治疗(EPC)已被提议作为减轻身体、心理和情感负担并改善健康结果的一种策略。虽然证据总体上支持EPC的益处,但报告结果的差异凸显了深入了解其在不同患者群体和医疗环境中的影响的必要性。

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估EPC对癌症患者及其护理人员的心理、功能状态和生活质量结果的综合影响。次要目的是评估患者及其家庭护理人员的满意度。

方法

按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。截至2024年1月,检索了四个数据库,即PubMed、Scopus、EBSCOhost和Cochrane。本研究纳入了报告癌症患者及其护理人员心理结果(焦虑、抑郁)、功能状态、生活质量和满意度的随机对照试验(RCT)和试点RCT研究。进行亚组分析以探讨EPC的短期(<24周)与长期(≥24周)效果。根据Mantel-Haenszel模型使用固定效应模型和根据DerSimonian和Laird方法使用随机效应模型计算平均差(MD)和标准平均差(SMD)。

结果

共有24项研究符合我们的纳入标准。对于癌症患者,EPC显著降低了焦虑(MD = -0.62,95%CI:-1.02;-0.23,p = 0.002)并改善了生活质量(SMD 0.13,95%CI:0.06;0.19,p = 0.0004)。然而,抑郁没有显著降低(SMD -0.15,95%CI:-0.36;0.05,p = 0.14),功能状态也没有显著改善(MD = 2.14,95%CI:-0.78;5.06,p = 0.15)。亚组分析显示,长期EPC显著降低了焦虑和抑郁,同时改善了生活质量,但对功能状态没有显著影响。对于护理人员,EPC对身体或心理生活质量均无显著影响(简短形式/ SF-36身体:MD = 0.81,95%CI:-0.46;2.09,p = 0.21;SF-36心理:MD = 0.53,95%CI:-1.03;2.08,p = 0.51)。此外,接受EPC的患者及其护理人员比接受常规护理的患者及其护理人员更有可能具有更高的满意度(MD 2.45,95%CI:0.90;4.01,p = 0.002,MD 4.09,95%CI:0.60;7.58,p = 0.02)。

结论

EPC减轻了癌症患者的长期心理负担,提高了生活质量和护理满意度体验。因此,应更早地将EPC更广泛地引入癌症护理中,以解决患者的心理负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72a/12036283/6079d77abf03/12904_2025_1737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72a/12036283/921841328fae/12904_2025_1737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72a/12036283/6079d77abf03/12904_2025_1737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72a/12036283/921841328fae/12904_2025_1737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72a/12036283/6079d77abf03/12904_2025_1737_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The benefits of early palliative care on psychological well-being, functional status, and health-related quality of life among cancer patients and their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期姑息治疗对癌症患者及其照顾者心理健康、功能状态和健康相关生活质量的益处:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 28;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01737-y.
2
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
3
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.由医疗保健专业人员进行的电话干预,旨在为患有确诊疾病的成年人的非正式护理人员提供教育和心理社会支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012533.pub2.
6
Impact of early palliative care on the quality of life in caregivers of cancer patients: A systematic review.早期姑息治疗对癌症患者照顾者生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2023 Jun;20(3):178-190. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12629. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
The effect of targeted palliative care interventions on depression, quality of life and caregiver burden in informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.靶向姑息治疗干预对晚期癌症患者非专业照护者的抑郁、生活质量和照护者负担的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Dec;160:104895. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104895. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
8
Home-based multidimensional survivorship programmes for breast cancer survivors.针对乳腺癌幸存者的居家多维康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 24;8(8):CD011152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011152.pub2.
9
Cardiovascular training for fatigue in people with cancer.针对癌症患者疲劳问题的心血管训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 20;2(2):CD015517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015517.
10
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer.音乐干预对改善癌症患者心理和生理结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-perceived burden, fear of progression and psychological flexibility in cervical cancer survivors: A moderated network analysis.宫颈癌幸存者的自我感知负担、疾病进展恐惧与心理灵活性:一项有调节的网络分析
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jul 23;12:100762. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100762. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Factors Associated with Caregiver Burden in Families of Patients with Palliative and Chronic Illness: A Cross-Sectional Study.姑息和慢性病患者家庭中与照顾者负担相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 31;18:4497-4510. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S533067. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators of Early Palliative Care in the Trajectory of People Living with Chronic Condition: A Mini Review Using Socio-ecological Framework to Inform Public Health Strategy.慢性病患者病程中早期姑息治疗的障碍与促进因素:一项运用社会生态框架为公共卫生策略提供信息的小型综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 29;17:4189-4197. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S473457. eCollection 2024.
2
Why and How to Integrate Early Palliative Care Into Cutting-Edge Personalized Cancer Care.为何以及如何将早期姑息治疗纳入前沿的个性化癌症护理之中。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2024 Jun;44(3):e100038. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_100038.
3
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
4
Existential distress among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.晚期癌症患者家属的存在性困扰:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6239. doi: 10.1002/pon.6239. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
Meta-Analysis of Effects of Early Palliative Care on Health-Related Outcomes Among Advanced Cancer Patients.早期姑息治疗对晚期癌症患者健康相关结局影响的Meta分析
Nurs Res. 2023;72(6):E180-E190. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000687. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
6
Family caregiver roles and challenges in assisting patients with cancer treatment decision-making: Analysis of data from a national survey.家庭照顾者在协助癌症患者治疗决策中的角色和挑战:来自全国性调查数据分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1965-1976. doi: 10.1111/hex.13805. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
7
The experiences of East Asian dementia caregivers in filial culture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孝道文化下东亚痴呆症照料者的经历:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 21;14:1173755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173755. eCollection 2023.
8
Early palliative care for solid and blood cancer patients and caregivers: Quantitative and qualitative results of a long-term experience as a case of value-based medicine.实体瘤和血液肿瘤患者及照护者的早期姑息治疗:作为基于价值的医学案例的长期经验的定量和定性结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;11:1092145. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1092145. eCollection 2023.
9
Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services and the Techniques Used for its Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review and a Bibliometric Analysis.患者对医疗服务的满意度及其评估技术:系统文献综述与文献计量分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;11(5):639. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050639.
10
Impact of Early Palliative Care to Improve Quality of Life of Advanced Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.早期姑息治疗对改善晚期癌症患者生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Jan-Mar;29(1):28-35. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_153_2022. Epub 2022 Sep 7.