• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既不公正也不合理:社会地位和新自由主义背景在拉丁美洲对社会正义认知的作用及其政治后果。

Ni justo ni legítimo: The role of social status and neoliberal context on perceived social justice in Latin America and its political consequences.

作者信息

Solano-Silva Dante, Guadalupe César, Sam-Castañeda Eileen

机构信息

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Peru.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12894. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12894.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12894
PMID:40296349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12038224/
Abstract

We study the role of social status and neoliberal contexts on perceptions of social justice and their consequences for political behaviour in Latin America. While most literature measures these perceptions through personal assessments of income distribution fairness, we resort to a wider understanding including perceptions of fairness on access to fundamental rights. Using data from the Latinobarómetro 2020 survey (N ≈ 20,204), we find that perceived social justice involves assessments of income inequality and access to education, health and justice. Based on self-interest theory, we expect higher-status individuals to perceive the world as more just, as this perception aligns with their interests. We also argue that neoliberal contexts moderate this relationship by narrowing justice perception gaps across status groups, as these contexts advance ideologies emphasizing individual responsibility and meritocracy. Regression models suggest that social status, measured through three indicators (social class, socioeconomic status, and subjective income) is positively related to perceived social justice. Interaction models suggest that, in more neoliberal societies, differences in perceived social justice among social status groups tend to narrow. Finally, we find that perceived social justice is associated with satisfaction with life, democracy and economic system, and reduced intention to participate in protests.

摘要

我们研究社会地位和新自由主义背景在拉丁美洲对社会正义观念的影响及其对政治行为的后果。虽然大多数文献通过个人对收入分配公平性的评估来衡量这些观念,但我们采用了更广泛的理解,包括对获得基本权利的公平性的看法。利用2020年拉丁美洲民意调查(样本量约为20204)的数据,我们发现,人们所感知的社会正义涉及对收入不平等以及获得教育、医疗和司法服务的评估。基于自我利益理论,我们预计社会地位较高的个人会认为世界更公正,因为这种认知与他们的利益相符。我们还认为,新自由主义背景通过缩小不同社会地位群体之间的正义认知差距来调节这种关系,因为这些背景推动了强调个人责任和精英统治的意识形态。回归模型表明,通过三个指标(社会阶层、社会经济地位和主观收入)衡量的社会地位与人们所感知的社会正义呈正相关。交互模型表明,在新自由主义程度更高的社会中,不同社会地位群体在社会正义认知上的差异往往会缩小。最后,我们发现,人们所感知的社会正义与生活满意度、对民主和经济体系的满意度相关,并降低了参与抗议活动的意愿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/12038224/daac0249775c/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/12038224/f48b6e3320be/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/12038224/1dedd3534854/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/12038224/daac0249775c/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/12038224/f48b6e3320be/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/12038224/1dedd3534854/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/12038224/daac0249775c/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ni justo ni legítimo: The role of social status and neoliberal context on perceived social justice in Latin America and its political consequences.既不公正也不合理:社会地位和新自由主义背景在拉丁美洲对社会正义认知的作用及其政治后果。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e12894. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12894.
2
Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America.拉丁美洲的收入不平等、分配公平与政治信任。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
3
Justice for me and for all: Longitudinal analysis of justice perceptions across demographic indicators.对我和所有人的公正:跨人口统计学指标的公正感知的纵向分析。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Jun;34(2):436-451. doi: 10.1111/jora.12895. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
What matters in health (care) universes: delusions, dilutions, and ways towards universal health justice.健康(关怀)宇宙中的重要因素:妄想、稀释和实现全民健康公正的途径。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):0. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0521-7.
5
[Peasant women and agrarian life in Latin America].[拉丁美洲的农村妇女与农业生活]
Tiers Monde (1960). 1985 Apr-Jul;26(102):325-34.
6
Better off than we know: distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in America.比我们知道的要好:对美国收入和收入不平等的扭曲看法。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):613-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504965. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
7
Why do people object to economic inequality? The role of distributive justice and social harmony concerns as predictors of support for redistribution and collective action.为什么人们反对经济不平等?分配正义和社会和谐关切作为支持再分配和集体行动预测因素的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12877. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12877.
8
Social capital, income inequality and the social gradient in self-rated health in Latin America: A fixed effects analysis.社会资本、收入不平等与拉丁美洲自评健康的社会梯度:固定效应分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;196:115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.025. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
9
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Challenging the neoliberal trend: the Venezuelan health care reform alternative.挑战新自由主义趋势:委内瑞拉医疗改革方案
Can J Public Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;97(6):I19-24. doi: 10.1007/BF03405240.

本文引用的文献

1
How positive and negative intergroup contact jointly inform minority support for social change: The role of system-fairness beliefs.积极和消极的群体间接触如何共同影响少数民族对社会变革的支持:制度公平信念的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;63(2):811-838. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12705. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
2
How Fair is Economic Inequality? Belief in a Just World and the Legitimation of Economic Disparities in 27 European Countries.经济不平等有多公平?27个欧洲国家对公正世界的信念与经济差距的合法化
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Mar;48(3):382-395. doi: 10.1177/01461672211002366. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Life Satisfaction Predicts Perceived Social Justice: The Lower Your Life Satisfaction, the Less Just You Perceive Society to Be.
生活满意度预示着对社会公平的认知:生活满意度越低,你所感知到的社会公平程度就越低。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:540835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.540835. eCollection 2020.
4
Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries.各国的主观状况与感知到的合法性。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;50(5):921-942. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2694. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Testing the status-legitimacy hypothesis: A multilevel modeling approach to the perception of legitimacy in income distribution in 36 nations.检验地位合法性假设:一种针对36个国家收入分配合法性认知的多层次建模方法。
J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(5):532-540. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1242472. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America.拉丁美洲的收入不平等、分配公平与政治信任。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis.弱势群体使社会制度合法化了吗?对地位-合法性假设的大规模检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 May;104(5):765-785. doi: 10.1037/a0031751. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
8
Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities.政治意识形态:其结构、功能及选择性亲和性。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:307-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600.
9
The norm of self-interest.自我利益的准则。
Am Psychol. 1999 Dec;54(12):1053-60. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.54.12.1053.
10
On the subjective quality of social justice: the role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments.论社会正义的主观品质:情感作为信息在正义判断心理学中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Sep;85(3):482-98. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.482.