Suppr超能文献

在农民确保负责任管理环境 stewardship 计划中为奶农和顾问创造价值。 (注:“stewardship”常见释义为“管理工作; stewardship program 直译为“管理计划”,这里结合语境意译为“环境管理计划”更合适,但要求不能添加解释说明,所以按要求保留直译为“环境 stewardship 计划” )

Building value for dairy farmers and advisors in the Farmers Assuring Responsible Management Environmental Stewardship Program.

作者信息

Erickson MaryGrace, Rovai Maristela, Villamediana Patricia, Schmidt Amy M, Stowell Richard R, Cortus Erin L

机构信息

Department of Bioproducts & Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.

Department of Dairy and Food Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.

出版信息

Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Mar 25;9:txaf038. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf038. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Major industry-led efforts aim at reducing the cradle-to-farmgate environmental impacts of milk production (e.g., U.S. Dairy Net Zero Initiative). Our qualitative, exploratory work sought to characterize farmer and advisor perceptions of an environmental sustainability assessment program [FARM ES Version 2] in the Upper Midwest. We aimed to 1) explore the ways participants valued environmental stewardship (ES) assessments, 2) describe feasible on-farm improvement strategies identified regionally, and 3) characterize how participants assigned responsibility for enacting selected improvement strategies. In Fall 2023, we held a series of 2 to 3 focus groups for each of 5 regions (n = 14 meetings total) including farmers (n = 24), advisors (n = 20), and processor representatives (n = 1). Facilitators guided participants through semi-structured prompts to generate qualitative data including meeting transcriptions, consensus lists, and consensus diagrams. First, we used a deductive-inductive process to analyze meeting transcriptions and identify themes related to the value of environmental stewardship assessments. Results suggested that participants valued simplicity, ease of data entry, availability of regional comparisons, and the ability to enumerate a baseline for environmental performance. Conversely, participants reported skepticism about accuracy and fairness and the usefulness of assessments as decision-support tools. Second, we examined consensus documents to generate a list of feasible strategies for on-farm improvement. Participants identified immediately feasible management strategies including cover cropping, genetic improvement, no-/minimum-tillage, precision nutrient management, herd/facility management technologies, monensin supplementation, and the conversion of fossil fuel to electric motors. Finally, we inspected collaborative actor-network diagrams generated with participants, which illustrated that participants envisioned implementation as complex and (in some instances) contingent on cooperation across supply chains and allied industries. Overall, our findings suggested that dairy farms need both accessible entry points into ES management and advanced technical and social support for implementing changes.

摘要

主要由行业主导的努力旨在减少牛奶生产从摇篮到农场大门阶段对环境的影响(例如,美国乳业净零倡议)。我们的定性探索性工作旨在描述美国中西部上游地区农民和顾问对一项环境可持续性评估计划[农场环境可持续性评估第2版]的看法。我们的目标是:1)探索参与者重视环境管理(ES)评估的方式;2)描述区域内确定的可行的农场改进策略;3)描述参与者如何分配实施选定改进策略的责任。2023年秋季,我们为5个地区中的每个地区举办了一系列2至3个焦点小组(总共14次会议),参与者包括农民(24人)、顾问(20人)和加工商代表(1人)。主持人通过半结构化提示引导参与者,以生成定性数据,包括会议记录、共识清单和共识图。首先,我们采用演绎-归纳法分析会议记录,并确定与环境管理评估价值相关的主题。结果表明,参与者重视评估的简单性、数据录入的便捷性、区域比较的可用性以及列举环境绩效基线的能力。相反,参与者对评估的准确性和公平性以及作为决策支持工具的有用性表示怀疑。其次,我们检查了共识文件,以生成一份农场改进的可行策略清单。参与者确定了立即可行的管理策略,包括覆盖作物种植、遗传改良、免耕/少耕、精准养分管理、畜群/设施管理技术、莫能菌素补充以及化石燃料向电动机的转换。最后,我们查看了与参与者共同生成的协作行动者网络图表,这些图表表明参与者将实施视为复杂的过程,并且(在某些情况下)取决于供应链和相关行业的合作。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,奶牛场既需要进入环境管理的便捷切入点,也需要实施变革所需的先进技术和社会支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe80/12035815/3880d341a034/txaf038_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验