• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用校正得分函数处理混杂因素和连续暴露测量误差。

Addressing confounding and continuous exposure measurement error using corrected score functions.

作者信息

Richardson Brian D, Blette Bryan S, Gilbert Peter B, Hudgens Michael G

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf045.

DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujaf045
PMID:40297938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12038274/
Abstract

Confounding and exposure measurement error can introduce bias when drawing inference about the marginal effect of an exposure on an outcome of interest. While there are broad methodologies for addressing each source of bias individually, confounding and exposure measurement error frequently co-occur, and there is a need for methods that address them simultaneously. In this paper, corrected score methods are derived under classical additive measurement error to draw inference about marginal exposure effects using only measured variables. Three estimators are proposed based on g-formula, inverse probability weighting, and doubly-robust estimation techniques. The estimators are shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal, and the doubly-robust estimator is shown to exhibit its namesake property. The methods, which are implemented in the R package mismex, perform well in finite samples under both confounding and measurement error as demonstrated by simulation studies. The proposed doubly-robust estimator is applied to study the effects of two biomarkers on HIV-1 infection using data from the HVTN 505 preventative vaccine trial.

摘要

在推断暴露因素对感兴趣结局的边际效应时,混杂因素和暴露测量误差可能会引入偏差。虽然有针对每种偏差来源的广泛方法,但混杂因素和暴露测量误差经常同时出现,因此需要能同时处理它们的方法。本文在经典加性测量误差下推导了校正得分方法,以便仅使用测量变量来推断边际暴露效应。基于g公式、逆概率加权和双重稳健估计技术提出了三种估计量。这些估计量被证明是一致且渐近正态的,并且双重稳健估计量表现出其同名特性。如模拟研究所示,在R包mismex中实现的这些方法在有限样本中,无论是存在混杂因素还是测量误差的情况下,都表现良好。所提出的双重稳健估计量被应用于利用HVTN 505预防性疫苗试验的数据,研究两种生物标志物对HIV-1感染的影响。

相似文献

1
Addressing confounding and continuous exposure measurement error using corrected score functions.使用校正得分函数处理混杂因素和连续暴露测量误差。
Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf045.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.机器学习结果回归改进了平均因果效应的双重稳健估计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1120-1133. doi: 10.1002/pds.5074. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.倾向评分加权加上比例风险模型中的调整不是双重稳健的。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae069.
8
Methods of causal effect estimation for high-dimensional treatments: A radiotherapy simulation study.高维治疗因果效应估计方法:一项放射治疗模拟研究。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17919. doi: 10.1002/mp.17919. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
9
Regularized principal spline functions to mitigate spatial confounding.用于减轻空间混杂的正则化主样条函数
Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf076.
10
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating generalized propensity scores with survey and attrition weighted data.利用调查和流失加权数据估计广义倾向得分。
Stat Med. 2024 May 20;43(11):2183-2202. doi: 10.1002/sim.10039. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Estimating a Causal Exposure Response Function with a Continuous Error-Prone Exposure: A Study of Fine Particulate Matter and All-Cause Mortality.利用具有连续易出错暴露因素估计因果暴露反应函数:细颗粒物与全因死亡率的研究
J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 2023 Mar;28(1):20-41. doi: 10.1007/s13253-022-00508-z. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
3
Antibody Fc effector functions and IgG3 associate with decreased HIV-1 risk.抗体 Fc 效应功能和 IgG3 与降低 HIV-1 风险相关。
J Clin Invest. 2019 Nov 1;129(11):4838-4849. doi: 10.1172/JCI126391.
4
Modification of the Association Between T-Cell Immune Responses and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection Risk by Vaccine-Induced Antibody Responses in the HVTN 505 Trial.在 HVTN 505 试验中,疫苗诱导的抗体反应对 T 细胞免疫反应与人类免疫缺陷病毒 1 型感染风险之间的关联的修饰作用。
J Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 28;217(8):1280-1288. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy008.
5
Higher T-Cell Responses Induced by DNA/rAd5 HIV-1 Preventive Vaccine Are Associated With Lower HIV-1 Infection Risk in an Efficacy Trial.DNA/rAd5 HIV-1预防性疫苗诱导的更高T细胞反应与一项疗效试验中较低的HIV-1感染风险相关。
J Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;215(9):1376-1385. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix086.
6
Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.贝叶斯方法在倾向评分法中处理协变量测量误差的应用。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1078-1096. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9533-x. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
7
Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.边际结构模型中时变协变量测量误差的校正
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 1;184(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww068. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Efficacy trial of a DNA/rAd5 HIV-1 preventive vaccine.DNA/rAd5 HIV-1 预防性疫苗的疗效试验。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2083-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310566. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
9
Causal inference with a quantitative exposure.定量暴露的因果推断。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Feb;25(1):315-35. doi: 10.1177/0962280212452333. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
10
Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.评论:揭开双重稳健性的神秘面纱:从不完整数据估计总体均值的替代策略比较。
Stat Sci. 2007;22(4):569-573. doi: 10.1214/07-STS227.