• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.边际结构模型中时变协变量测量误差的校正
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 1;184(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww068. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
2
Evaluating Flexible Modeling of Continuous Covariates in Inverse-Weighted Estimators.评估逆加权估计中连续协变量的灵活建模。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;188(6):1181-1191. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz004.
3
Accuracy of conventional and marginal structural Cox model estimators: a simulation study.传统和边际结构Cox模型估计器的准确性:一项模拟研究。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 13. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1208.
4
Simulating from marginal structural models with time-dependent confounding.从具有时变混杂的边缘结构模型中进行模拟。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4190-206. doi: 10.1002/sim.5472. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
5
A marginal structural model for multiple-outcome survival data:assessing the impact of injection drug use on several causes of death in the Canadian Co-infection Cohort.多结局生存数据的边缘结构模型:评估注射吸毒对加拿大合并感染队列中几种死因的影响。
Stat Med. 2014 Apr 15;33(8):1409-25. doi: 10.1002/sim.6043. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
6
Considerations for analysis of time-to-event outcomes measured with error: Bias and correction with SIMEX.考虑对存在误差的生存时间结局进行分析:SIMEX 法的偏倚和校正。
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 15;37(8):1276-1289. doi: 10.1002/sim.7554. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models.关于边际结构模型的贝叶斯估计
Biometrics. 2015 Jun;71(2):279-88. doi: 10.1111/biom.12269. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
8
Effect modification by time-varying covariates.随时间变化的协变量对效应的修正
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 1;166(9):994-1002; discussion 1003-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm231. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
9
The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.从因果关系图的角度看,逻辑回归模型中混杂等价性的令人震惊的问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0449-7.
10
Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.纵向观察性研究因果推断的工具变量与逆概率加权法
Stat Methods Med Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):17-48. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm351ra.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing confounding and continuous exposure measurement error using corrected score functions.使用校正得分函数处理混杂因素和连续暴露测量误差。
Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf045.
2
AteMeVs: An R package for the estimation of the average treatment effect with measurement error and variable selection for confounders.AteMeVs:一个用于在存在测量误差和混杂因素变量选择情况下估计平均处理效应的 R 包。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 30;19(9):e0296951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296951. eCollection 2024.
3
Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential confounders.同时针对潜在混杂因素进行变量选择和测量误差处理,估计平均处理效应。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):691-711. doi: 10.1177/09622802221146308. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
4
Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers.提出因果问题并给出有原则的统计答案。
Stat Med. 2020 Dec 30;39(30):4922-4948. doi: 10.1002/sim.8741. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Quantitative Bias Analysis for a Misclassified Confounder: A Comparison Between Marginal Structural Models and Conditional Models for Point Treatments.对有偏分类混杂因素的定量偏差分析:点治疗的边际结构模型与条件模型的比较。
Epidemiology. 2020 Nov;31(6):796-805. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001239.
6
Evaluating Flexible Modeling of Continuous Covariates in Inverse-Weighted Estimators.评估逆加权估计中连续协变量的灵活建模。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;188(6):1181-1191. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz004.
7
When to Censor?何时进行审查?
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 1;187(3):623-632. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx281.

本文引用的文献

1
Time-updated systolic blood pressure and the progression of chronic kidney disease: a cohort study.时间更新的收缩压与慢性肾脏病进展:一项队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):258-65. doi: 10.7326/M14-0488.
2
Effect of pregnancy and the postpartum period on adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected women established on treatment.怀孕及产后阶段对已接受治疗的HIV感染女性坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗的影响。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Apr 1;68(4):477-80. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000501.
3
HIV virological rebounds but not blips predict liver fibrosis progression in antiretroviral-treated HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients.在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV/丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者中,HIV病毒学反弹而非病毒学波动可预测肝纤维化进展。
HIV Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12168. Epub 2014 May 18.
4
African American race and HIV virological suppression: beyond disparities in clinic attendance.非裔美国人种族和 HIV 病毒学抑制:超越就诊差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun 15;179(12):1484-92. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu069. Epub 2014 May 8.
5
Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates.带有易出错协变量的逆概率加权法。
Biometrika. 2013;100(3):671-680. doi: 10.1093/biomet/ast022.
6
The effect of error-in-confounders on the estimation of the causal parameter when using marginal structural models and inverse probability-of-treatment weights: a simulation study.使用边际结构模型和治疗权重逆概率时混杂因素中的误差对因果参数估计的影响:一项模拟研究
Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):1-15. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0039.
7
Revisiting predictors of virologic response to PEGIFN + RBV therapy in HIV-/HCV-coinfected patients: the role of metabolic factors and elevated GGT levels.重新探讨 HIV/HCV 共感染患者接受 PEGIFN+RBV 治疗的病毒学应答的预测因子:代谢因素和升高的 GGT 水平的作用。
J Viral Hepat. 2014 Jan;21(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12118. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
8
A systematic review of data on biological variation for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and γ-glutamyl transferase.丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶和γ-谷氨酰转移酶的生物学变异数据的系统评价。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Oct;51(10):1997-2007. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0096.
9
Bias attenuation results for nondifferentially mismeasured ordinal and coarsened confounders.非差异测量误差的有序和粗化混杂因素的偏倚衰减结果。
Biometrika. 2013;100(1):241-248. doi: 10.1093/biomet/ass054.
10
Earlier sustained virologic response end points for regulatory approval and dose selection of hepatitis C therapies. 早期持续病毒学应答终点在丙型肝炎治疗的监管审批和剂量选择中的应用。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(7):1450-1455.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.039. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

边际结构模型中时变协变量测量误差的校正

Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.

作者信息

Kyle Ryan P, Moodie Erica E M, Klein Marina B, Abrahamowicz Michał

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 1;184(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww068. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kww068
PMID:27416840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4967599/
Abstract

Unbiased estimation of causal parameters from marginal structural models (MSMs) requires a fundamental assumption of no unmeasured confounding. Unfortunately, the time-varying covariates used to obtain inverse probability weights are often error-prone. Although substantial measurement error in important confounders is known to undermine control of confounders in conventional unweighted regression models, this issue has received comparatively limited attention in the MSM literature. Here we propose a novel application of the simulation-extrapolation (SIMEX) procedure to address measurement error in time-varying covariates, and we compare 2 approaches. The direct approach to SIMEX-based correction targets outcome model parameters, while the indirect approach corrects the weights estimated using the exposure model. We assess the performance of the proposed methods in simulations under different clinically plausible assumptions. The simulations demonstrate that measurement errors in time-dependent covariates may induce substantial bias in MSM estimators of causal effects of time-varying exposures, and that both proposed SIMEX approaches yield practically unbiased estimates in scenarios featuring low-to-moderate degrees of error. We illustrate the proposed approach in a simple analysis of the relationship between sustained virological response and liver fibrosis progression among persons infected with hepatitis C virus, while accounting for measurement error in γ-glutamyltransferase, using data collected in the Canadian Co-infection Cohort Study from 2003 to 2014.

摘要

从边际结构模型(MSM)中无偏估计因果参数需要一个无未测量混杂因素的基本假设。不幸的是,用于获得逆概率权重的时变协变量往往容易出错。虽然已知重要混杂因素中的大量测量误差会破坏传统未加权回归模型中混杂因素的控制,但这个问题在MSM文献中受到的关注相对有限。在这里,我们提出了模拟外推法(SIMEX)的一种新应用,以解决时变协变量中的测量误差问题,并且我们比较了两种方法。基于SIMEX的直接校正方法针对结局模型参数,而间接方法校正使用暴露模型估计的权重。我们在不同临床合理假设下的模拟中评估所提出方法的性能。模拟表明,时依协变量中的测量误差可能会在MSM估计时变暴露的因果效应中引起实质性偏差,并且在低至中等误差程度的情况下,两种提出的SIMEX方法都能产生实际无偏的估计。我们使用2003年至2014年加拿大合并感染队列研究中收集的数据,在对丙型肝炎病毒感染者的持续病毒学应答与肝纤维化进展之间的关系进行简单分析时,说明了所提出的方法,同时考虑了γ-谷氨酰转移酶中的测量误差。