Romano Celeste J, Tsukuda Tiffany N, Zhao Rui, Quint Joshua, Jain Seema, Murray Erin L
California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2025 Apr 29:333549251314409. doi: 10.1177/00333549251314409.
Place-based disadvantage indices have been used to assess health disparities and allocate funding and health resources. We assessed excess mortality in California during the COVID-19 pandemic by Healthy Places Index (HPI) quartile, a disadvantage index used by the California Department of Public Health to structure COVID-19 response efforts.
We estimated expected deaths from all causes during the COVID-19 pandemic by fitting a quasi-Poisson regression model to actual deaths that occurred from 2014 through 2019. We estimated ranges of excess deaths by calculating differences between actual deaths and (1) the average expected number of deaths and (2) the upper bound of the 95% prediction interval. The percentage of excess deaths equaled the number of excess deaths divided by the corresponding threshold. We reported estimates overall and across demographic groups, stratified by HPI quartile; quartile 4 indicated communities with the most advantaged social and environmental conditions.
From February 2020 through April 2022, the number of excess deaths in California ranged from 81 245 to 107 806, with 93 309 deaths attributed to COVID-19. The number of excess deaths decreased across quartiles, from 27 924 to 35 615 (20.5%-28.0%) in HPI quartile 1 to 7757 to 14 477 (4.6%-9.2%) in HPI quartile 4. The Hispanic or Latine population had a disproportionate percentage of excess deaths across all quartiles, whereas American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and White (all non-Hispanic) populations had percentage excess death estimates in quartile 2 that were similar to or higher than in quartile 1.
Health policies should supplement the use of place-based disparity measures with other measures that support groups at high risk for adverse health outcomes residing in more socially and environmentally advantaged communities.
基于地点的劣势指数已被用于评估健康差距以及分配资金和卫生资源。我们通过健康场所指数(HPI)四分位数评估了加利福尼亚州在新冠疫情期间的超额死亡率,该指数是加利福尼亚州公共卫生部用于构建新冠疫情应对措施的劣势指数。
我们通过对2014年至2019年发生的实际死亡人数拟合准泊松回归模型,估算了新冠疫情期间所有原因导致的预期死亡人数。我们通过计算实际死亡人数与(1)平均预期死亡人数以及(2)95%预测区间上限之间的差值,估算了超额死亡人数范围。超额死亡百分比等于超额死亡人数除以相应阈值。我们报告了总体以及按人口群体划分、并按HPI四分位数分层的估算结果;四分位数4表示社会和环境条件最优越的社区。
从2020年2月到2022年4月,加利福尼亚州的超额死亡人数在81245至107806之间,其中93309例死亡归因于新冠病毒。各四分位数的超额死亡人数均有所下降,从HPI四分位数1中的27924至35615(20.5%-28.0%)降至HPI四分位数4中的7757至14477(4.6%-9.2%)。西班牙裔或拉丁裔人口在所有四分位数中的超额死亡百分比过高,而美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民、亚裔、黑人或非裔美国人、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民以及白人(均为非西班牙裔)人口在四分位数2中的超额死亡百分比估算值与四分位数1中的相似或更高。
卫生政策应在使用基于地点的差距衡量指标的基础上,辅以其他措施,以支持居住在社会和环境条件更优越社区中健康状况不良风险较高的群体。