• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参考校正视觉预测检查:一种用于非线性混合效应模型的更直观诊断方法。

The Reference-Corrected Visual Predictive Check: A More Intuitive Diagnostic for Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models.

作者信息

Ibrahim Moustafa M A, Jonsson E Niclas, Bergstrand Martin

机构信息

Pharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

AAPS J. 2025 Apr 29;27(4):86. doi: 10.1208/s12248-025-01065-2.

DOI:10.1208/s12248-025-01065-2
PMID:40299161
Abstract

The prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC) is an informative model diagnostic that can offer advantages over the standard visual predictive check (VPC) when heterogenous study designs and adaptive dosing are used. However, a drawback with these plots is that prediction correction often results in y-axis values and trends that are unintuitive, difficult to explain, and challenging to communicate even among experts. The reference-corrected visual predictive check (rcVPC) offers a solution to these problems by leveraging a user-defined set of independent variables, for a more intuitive model diagnostic and an efficient communication of results to a wider audience. The rcVPC methodology is based on the definition of a reference dataset. Simulations are conducted with this reference dataset and the observed dataset, and then the simulated and the observed dependent variables are normalized by the population prediction for the user-defined independent variables in the reference dataset. The opportunity to manipulate time in the reference dataset is a unique feature that gives rcVPC the ability to visually characterize exposure-response relationships with delayed effect onset. The rcVPC approach was compared to pcVPCs and traditional VPCs for a range of examples inspired by real data. The rcVPC methodology was demonstrated to offer a more intuitive interpretation and more effective guidance to model development in a way that is not possible for VPC or pcVPC plots.

摘要

预测校正视觉预测检查(pcVPC)是一种信息丰富的模型诊断方法,当使用异质性研究设计和适应性给药时,它比标准视觉预测检查(VPC)具有优势。然而,这些图的一个缺点是,预测校正通常会导致y轴值和趋势不直观、难以解释,甚至在专家之间进行交流也具有挑战性。参考校正视觉预测检查(rcVPC)通过利用一组用户定义的自变量,为这些问题提供了一个解决方案,从而实现更直观的模型诊断,并能更有效地将结果传达给更广泛的受众。rcVPC方法基于参考数据集的定义。使用该参考数据集和观察数据集进行模拟,然后通过参考数据集中用户定义自变量的总体预测对模拟和观察到的因变量进行归一化。在参考数据集中操纵时间的机会是一个独特的特性,它使rcVPC能够直观地表征具有延迟效应发作的暴露-反应关系。在一系列受实际数据启发的示例中,将rcVPC方法与pcVPC和传统VPC进行了比较。结果表明,rcVPC方法能够以VPC或pcVPC图无法实现的方式,为模型开发提供更直观的解释和更有效的指导。

相似文献

1
The Reference-Corrected Visual Predictive Check: A More Intuitive Diagnostic for Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models.参考校正视觉预测检查:一种用于非线性混合效应模型的更直观诊断方法。
AAPS J. 2025 Apr 29;27(4):86. doi: 10.1208/s12248-025-01065-2.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Plug-and-play use of tree-based methods: consequences for clinical prediction modeling.基于树的方法的即插即用:对临床预测模型的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;184:111834. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111834. Epub 2025 May 19.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
9
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
V ACHER: Visualization of complex trial data in pharmacometric analyses with covariates.VACHER:协变量的药代动力学分析中复杂试验数据的可视化。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;10(9):1092-1106. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12679. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
2
Translation Between Two Models; Application with Integrated Glucose Homeostasis Models.两种模型间的转换;整合血糖稳态模型的应用。
Pharm Res. 2019 Apr 17;36(6):86. doi: 10.1007/s11095-019-2592-9.
3
Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models.
用于诊断非线性混合效应模型的预测校正可视化预测检验。
AAPS J. 2011 Jun;13(2):143-51. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9255-z. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
4
Pharmacometrics 2020.《药物代谢动力学》2020 年版。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;50(9 Suppl):151S-157S. doi: 10.1177/0091270010376977.
5
Handling data below the limit of quantification in mixed effect models.在混合效应模型中处理低于定量限的数据。
AAPS J. 2009 Jun;11(2):371-80. doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9112-5. Epub 2009 May 19.
6
Models for plasma glucose, HbA1c, and hemoglobin interrelationships in patients with type 2 diabetes following tesaglitazar treatment.替格列净治疗后2型糖尿病患者血浆葡萄糖、糖化血红蛋白和血红蛋白相互关系的模型
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug;84(2):228-35. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.2. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
7
Diagnosing model diagnostics.诊断模型诊断
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jul;82(1):17-20. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100241.
8
Evaluating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models using the posterior predictive check.使用后验预测检验评估药代动力学/药效学模型。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001 Apr;28(2):171-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1011555016423.