Craciun Lavinia, Ignuta Flavia, Rayudu Uma Shailendri, Afra Maliha, Rosca Ovidiu, Vlad Adrian, Aburel Oana, Velimirovici Dana Emilia
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Doctoral School, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 6;13(4):886. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040886.
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at a heightened risk of adverse outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the influence of glycemic control on systemic inflammation and clinical severity remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare inflammatory markers, composite severity scores, and clinical outcomes between T2DM patients with COVID-19 who had well-controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c < 7%) versus those with poorly controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7%). We retrospectively reviewed 181 adult patients with T2DM and severe COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: well-controlled ( = 117) and poorly controlled ( = 64) T2DM. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, ferritin, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, platelets, and calculated indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]) were collected. Composite severity scores (APACHE II, CURB-65, and NEWS) and clinical outcomes (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, mortality, and length of stay) were compared. Statistical tests used included Student's -test or the Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables, with < 0.05 deemed significant. The two groups did not differ significantly in age or duration of diabetes ( = 0.40 and = 0.75, respectively). Patients with poorly controlled T2DM exhibited higher inflammatory markers (mean CRP of 93.4 mg/L vs. 78.6 mg/L, = 0.002; IL-6 of 64.2 pg/mL vs. 52.8 pg/mL, = 0.004) and elevated severity scores (APACHE II of 16.8 vs. 14.1, = 0.001). Poor glycemic control was associated with higher ICU admissions (39.1% vs. 22.2%, = 0.02) and mortality (14.1% vs. 6.0%, = 0.05). In T2DM patients hospitalized with COVID-19, poor glycemic control correlates with heightened inflammatory responses, worse composite severity scores, and increased rates of unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the necessity of stringent glucose management to mitigate inflammation and improve prognoses in this vulnerable patient population.
2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者感染2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)后出现不良结局的风险更高。然而,血糖控制对全身炎症和临床严重程度的影响仍未完全明确。本研究旨在比较糖尿病控制良好(糖化血红蛋白<7%)的COVID-19合并T2DM患者与糖尿病控制不佳(糖化血红蛋白≥7%)的患者之间的炎症标志物、综合严重程度评分和临床结局。我们回顾性分析了2022年1月至2023年12月期间入住一家三级医院的181例成年T2DM合并重症COVID-19患者。患者分为两组:糖尿病控制良好组(n = 117)和糖尿病控制不佳组(n = 64)。收集了基线人口统计学资料、合并症和实验室参数(C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、铁蛋白、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数、血小板以及计算得出的指标,如中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值[NLR]和全身免疫炎症指数[SII])。比较了综合严重程度评分(急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II [APACHE II]、社区获得性肺炎CURB-65评分和国家早期预警评分[NEWS])和临床结局(入住重症监护病房、机械通气、死亡率和住院时间)。所使用的统计检验包括用于连续变量的Student's t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验以及用于分类变量的卡方检验,P<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。两组在年龄或糖尿病病程方面无显著差异(分别为P = 0. ,40和P = 0.75)。糖尿病控制不佳的患者炎症标志物水平更高(平均C反应蛋白为93.4 mg/L vs. 78.6 mg/L,P = 0.002;白细胞介素-6为64.2 pg/mL vs. ,52.8 pg/mL,P = 0.004)且严重程度评分更高(APACHE II为16.8 vs. 14.1,P = 0.001)。血糖控制不佳与更高的入住重症监护病房率(39.1% vs. 22.2%,P = 0.02)和死亡率(14.1% vs. 6.0%,P = 0.05)相关。在因COVID-19住院的T2DM患者中,血糖控制不佳与炎症反应增强、综合严重程度评分更差以及不良结局发生率增加相关。这些发现强调了严格血糖管理对于减轻该脆弱患者群体炎症和改善预后的必要性。