Assessing the health impacts of implementing a 'Comprehensive Rural Health Project' health system in a low-income region of rural Nepal.

Establishing and building grassroots, community-based healthcare systems is a key approach to improving healthcare access sustainably in low-income regions of the world. One prominent early example of this was the Comprehensive Rural Health Project (CRHP), inspiring the framework for subsequent large-scale programs globally. However, many community health projects do not provide the same breadth of services as CRHP, which may have impacts on health outcomes. This qualitative study focused on 12 Dalit villages in rural Nepal following an intervention - known as the Village Alive Project (VAP) - to boost healthcare provision through a CRHP-style health system. Villagers' and health workers' impressions of changes in healthcare access were assessed through 42 semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was performed using NVIVO by two independent authors; themes were finalized by reaching consensus. Three generated themes were shared by VAP and control villages: 'changes in access to healthcare services'; 'changes in health promotion and disease prevention' and 'inequalities and their effects on health'. A fourth theme, 'views on the expansion of VAP to non-VAP villages', was generated uniquely for the control group. Lack of health education and sanitation facilities, as well as social stigma, were listed as barriers to health prior to VAP's establishment; most participants felt these have been largely addressed since the arrival of VAP. Implementing more comprehensive primary healthcare on top of pre-existing community-based healthcare systems is feasible, with encouraging findings from this low-income region of rural Nepal. Participants felt VAP improved understanding of diseases such as leprosy, which may benefit future vertical interventions. Improvements in various aspects of health and healthcare were reported for most or all study themes across intervention-group villages; improvements were also noted in control villages but with more evidence of ongoing barriers to health. Further studies looking at key quantitative outcomes are required to triangulate findings.