• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能辅助评估急性心肌梗死患者的左心室整体纵向应变:RESUS-AMI试验的亚分析

Artificial intelligence-assisted left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a RESUS-AMI trial sub-analysis.

作者信息

Mekonnen Demeke, Spitzer Ernest, McFadden Eugene P, Caplice Noel M, Ren Claire B

机构信息

Cardialysis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Cardiology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03409-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10554-025-03409-7
PMID:40301202
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this sub-analysis of the RESUS-AMI trial was to evaluate the correlation of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessments with infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The reproducibility of GLS and other echocardiographic parameters derived with the AI-assisted software were also assessed.

METHODS

This is a post-hoc imaging sub-analysis of the RESUS-AMI trial. Echocardiographic LVEF, volumes and GLS were measured with AI-assisted software (CAAS Qardia 2.0) using automated and semi-automated methods. The CMR LVEF, LV dimensions and infarct size were obtained from a CMR core lab with an off-line workstation (CAAS MRV 4.1).

RESULTS

In total 169 echocardiograms were analysed and the GLS showed moderate correlation with the CMR infarct size (r = 0.58 automated and 0.64 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) and LVEF (r=-0.63 automated and - 0.65 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) from 81 CMR recordings. GLS also showed moderate correlation with the LVEF (r= -0.51 automated and - 0.67 semi-automated, both p < 0.001) from echocardiography. The inter-observer reproducibility was excellent in GLS from both the automated (intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.94, bias = 0.08, limit of agreement (LOA) = 1.75) and semi-automated analysis (ICC = 0.93, bias=-0.68, LOA = 1.44). The intra-observer reproducibility was excellent in all echocardiographic measurements.

CONCLUSION

GLS derived from the AI-assisted software (automated or semi-automated) could be used as a marker of LV systolic function as it correlates well the infarct size and LVEF assessed with CMR and LVEF with echocardiography.

摘要

目的

本项对RESUS-AMI试验的亚分析旨在评估人工智能(AI)辅助超声心动图整体纵向应变(GLS)评估与梗死面积、左心室射血分数(LVEF)以及接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的心脏磁共振(CMR)成像测得的心室容积之间的相关性。还评估了使用AI辅助软件得出的GLS及其他超声心动图参数的可重复性。

方法

这是对RESUS-AMI试验的一项事后成像亚分析。使用AI辅助软件(CAAS Qardia 2.0)通过自动和半自动方法测量超声心动图LVEF、容积和GLS。CMR LVEF、左心室尺寸和梗死面积由一个配备离线工作站(CAAS MRV 4.1)的CMR核心实验室获得。

结果

共分析了169份超声心动图,GLS与来自81份CMR记录的CMR梗死面积(自动测量r = 0.58,半自动测量r = 0.64,均p < 0.001)和LVEF(自动测量r = -0.63,半自动测量r = -0.65,均p < 0.001)呈中度相关。GLS与超声心动图测得的LVEF(自动测量r = -0.51,半自动测量r = -0.67,均p < 0.001)也呈中度相关。自动分析(组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.94,偏差 = 0.08,一致性界限(LOA)= 1.75)和半自动分析(ICC = 0.93,偏差 = -0.68,LOA = 1.44)得出的GLS观察者间可重复性均极佳。所有超声心动图测量的观察者内可重复性均极佳。

结论

源自AI辅助软件(自动或半自动)的GLS可作为左心室收缩功能的标志物,因为它与CMR评估的梗死面积和LVEF以及超声心动图评估的LVEF相关性良好。

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence-assisted left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a RESUS-AMI trial sub-analysis.人工智能辅助评估急性心肌梗死患者的左心室整体纵向应变:RESUS-AMI试验的亚分析
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03409-7.
2
Artificial Intelligence Performance in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Strain Analysis for Aortic Stenosis: Validation with Echocardiography and Healthy Controls.人工智能在主动脉瓣狭窄心脏磁共振应变分析中的性能:与超声心动图及健康对照的验证
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 22;61(6):950. doi: 10.3390/medicina61060950.
3
The prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction: a prespecified substudy of the REDUCE-AMI trial.心肌梗死且射血分数保留患者中整体纵向应变的预后价值:REDUCE-AMI试验的一项预先设定的亚组研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar 27;26(4):620-627. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf015.
4
Left ventricular flow kinetics and myocardial deformation following acute infarction: Additional predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance four-dimensional flow for left ventricular remodeling post-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后左心室血流动力学及心肌变形:心脏磁共振四维血流对ST段抬高型心肌梗死后左心室重构的额外预测价值
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 May 7;27(2):101905. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101905.
5
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Strain After Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死心肌应变的磁共振成像:一项系统评价
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006498.
6
Safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events, infarct size and LV ejection fraction assessed by CMRI.干细胞疗法在急性心肌梗死中的安全性和有效性:一项关于通过心脏磁共振成像评估不良事件、梗死面积和左心室射血分数的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2025 Jun 27;12(1):e003301. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003301.
7
AI-based Hepatic Steatosis Detection and Integrated Hepatic Assessment from Cardiac CT Attenuation Scans Enhances All-cause Mortality Risk Stratification: A Multi-center Study.基于人工智能的心脏CT衰减扫描检测肝脂肪变性及综合肝脏评估可增强全因死亡风险分层:一项多中心研究
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.09.25329157. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157.
8
Global longitudinal strain in the prediction of significant coronary artery disease: how accurate is it for patients with a high clinical probability of chronic coronary syndrome and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction?整体纵向应变在预测严重冠状动脉疾病中的应用:对于慢性冠状动脉综合征临床可能性高且左心室射血分数保留的患者,其准确性如何?
Echo Res Pract. 2025 Jul 1;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s44156-025-00084-1.
9
Global longitudinal strain by feature tracking for optimized prediction of adverse remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.通过特征追踪测量整体纵向应变以优化预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死后的不良重塑
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Jan;110(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01649-2. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Validating real-time three-dimensional echocardiography against cardiac magnetic resonance, for the determination of ventricular mass, volume and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.实时三维超声心动图与心脏磁共振对比评估心室质量、容积和射血分数的验证:荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Mar;113(3):367-392. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02204-5. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanism and Impact of Left Atrial Dyssynchrony on Long-Term Clinical Outcome During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.心脏再同步治疗期间左心房不同步对长期临床结局的机制及影响
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr;18(4):421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
A deep learning based method for left ventricular strain measurements: repeatability and accuracy compared to experienced echocardiographers.一种基于深度学习的左心室应变测量方法:与有经验的超声心动图专家相比的可重复性和准确性。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01470-7.
3
Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and angiographic predictors for the final infarct size assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance in acute STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,通过心脏磁共振评估最终梗死面积的临床、心电图、超声心动图和血管造影预测因素。
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Aug 24;76(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00526-x.
4
Artificial intelligence-derived left ventricular strain in echocardiography in patients treated with chemotherapy.人工智能衍生的超声心动图左心室应变在接受化疗的患者中的应用。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Sep;40(9):1903-1910. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03178-9. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Effect of sacubitril-valsartan on left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性心肌梗死患者左心室重构的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 28;15:1366035. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1366035. eCollection 2024.
6
Quantification of left ventricular myocardial strain: Comparison between MRI tagging, MRI feature tracking, and ultrasound speckle tracking.左心室心肌应变定量分析:MRI 标记、MRI 特征追踪和超声斑点追踪的比较。
NMR Biomed. 2024 Sep;37(9):e5164. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5164. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
7
Effect of residual myocardial ischemia on recovery of left ventricular function after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余心肌缺血对左心室功能恢复的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03777-3.
8
External validation of a deep learning algorithm for automated echocardiographic strain measurements.用于自动超声心动图应变测量的深度学习算法的外部验证
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023 Nov 20;5(1):60-68. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad072. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Comparison of manual and artificial intelligence based quantification of myocardial strain by feature tracking-a cardiovascular MR study in health and disease.基于特征追踪的心肌应变手动和人工智能定量比较——健康和疾病的心血管磁共振研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1003-1015. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10127-y. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
10
Echocardiography Core Laboratory Validation of a Novel Vendor-Independent Web-Based Software for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain.一种用于评估左心室整体纵向应变的新型独立于供应商的基于网络软件的超声心动图核心实验室验证
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Jul;31(3):135-141. doi: 10.4250/jcvi.2022.0130.