Xu Chaoyu, Zhang Qingrong, Xu Sihua, Xiao Yiyuan, Zhao Liangyu, Li Tuojian, Guo Wenjie, Zhong Yanling, Chen Haitao
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbes and Biosafety, School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Apr 28;11(2):e002547. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002547. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to evaluate the interactions of physical activity and polygenic risk score (PRS) on risks of atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease (CHD), hypertension, and ischaemic stroke.
This study included 91 629 participants from UK Biobank in this study, all of whom had worn a wrist-worn accelerometer for 7 consecutive days. We computed total volume of physical activity (TPA) and time spent in moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and light intensity physical activity (LPA). Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate associations of physical activity with the four cardiovascular outcomes. Interactions between physical activity and PRS were investigated on multiplicative and additive scales.
During a median follow-up of 7.9 years, 3811 atrial fibrillation, 3994 CHD, 7345 hypertension and 1001 ischaemic stroke cases were recorded. TPA, MVPA and LPA were all negatively associated with risks of the four cardiovascular outcomes, generally independent of genetic risk. Association between LPA and atrial fibrillation was U-shaped among low-PRS stratum (p=0.01), and association between TPA and hypertension was attenuated with genetic risk increasing (p=0.02). Attributable risk (AR) of inactivity was higher in the high-PRS population. For example, increasing MVPA resulted in a twofold greater reduction in CHD cases among individuals with high PRS (AR=2.17%) than among those with low PRS (AR=1.09%).
Increasing physical activity, including LPA, was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases. The extent of this benefit may differ among individuals with different genetic risks.
本研究旨在评估体力活动与多基因风险评分(PRS)对心房颤动、冠心病(CHD)、高血压和缺血性中风风险的相互作用。
本研究纳入了英国生物银行的91629名参与者,他们均连续7天佩戴腕式加速度计。我们计算了体力活动总量(TPA)、中度至剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)和轻度强度体力活动(LPA)所花费的时间。采用Cox比例风险模型评估体力活动与四种心血管结局的关联。在乘法和加法尺度上研究了体力活动与PRS之间的相互作用。
在中位随访7.9年期间,记录了3811例心房颤动、3994例冠心病、7345例高血压和1001例缺血性中风病例。TPA、MVPA和LPA均与四种心血管结局的风险呈负相关,一般独立于遗传风险。在低PRS分层中,LPA与心房颤动之间的关联呈U形(p=0.01),TPA与高血压之间的关联随着遗传风险的增加而减弱(p=0.02)。高PRS人群中不活动的归因风险(AR)更高。例如,增加MVPA导致高PRS个体(AR=2.17%)的冠心病病例减少幅度比低PRS个体(AR=1.09%)大两倍。
增加体力活动,包括LPA,与心血管疾病风险降低相关。这种益处的程度在具有不同遗传风险的个体中可能有所不同。