Suppr超能文献

PRESERFLO微分流器™与非穿透性深层巩膜切除术治疗青光眼的一年结果

PRESERFLO Microshunt™ versus Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy for Glaucoma Management, One-Year Results.

作者信息

Cunha Bruna, Gil Pedro, Lopes Edgar, Elisa-Luís Maria, Reina Maria, Gomes Teresa, Cardigos Joana

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, ULS São José, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 25;19:1377-1386. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S514126. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (PF) versus Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy (NPDS) with Esnoper.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative cohort study at a tertiary hospital including 79 eyes from 79 patients submitted to surgery (32 PF implantation, Group 1 and 47 NPDS, Group 2) between January 2022 and August 2023, with one year follow-up. Outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), complications, surgical duration, postoperative major and minor interventions. Surgical failure was defined as IOP>21 mmHg or <20% reduction from baseline, IOP<5 mmHg, major postoperative intervention, or loss of light perception. Conversely, success was defined as the absence of these failure criteria: complete success without glaucoma medications, and qualified success with.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, IOP, number of IOP-lowering medications, and visual field defects, were comparable between groups (p>0.05). After one year, IOP decreased significantly in both groups (PF: 20.13±6.20 to 15.00±3.15 mmHg; NPDS: 19.57±5.73 to 13.30±3.59 mmHg, both p<0.001). Complete success rates were 28.1% for PF and 40.4% for NPDS (p=0.189), while surgical failure was significantly higher in the PF group (65.6% vs 38.3%, p=0.015). Major reinterventions were more frequent with PF (10 vs 3, p=0.005), partly due to encapsulated blebs, while NPDS required more minor interventions (2 vs 17, p=0.002). Complication rates were similar (31.3% vs 14.9%, p=0.073), but surgical duration was shorter in the PF group (60.03±17.95 min vs 69.91±15.23 min, p=0.008).

CONCLUSION

PF and NPDS share comparable safety profiles. Although PF surgery is faster, it is associated with a higher rate of major postoperative interventions and failure. NPDS, while requiring more minor interventions, such as goniopuncture and needling, rarely demands major re-interventions. NPDS is known for its meticulous and technically challenging technique, but once mastered, it can result in fewer invasive re-interventions and improved efficacy.

摘要

目的

比较 PRESERFLO™ 微分流器(PF)与非穿透性深层巩膜切除术(NPDS)联合 Esnoper 的短期疗效和安全性。

方法

在一家三级医院进行回顾性比较队列研究,纳入 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间接受手术的 79 例患者的 79 只眼(32 只眼行 PF 植入,第 1 组;47 只眼行 NPDS,第 2 组),随访一年。观察指标包括眼压(IOP)、并发症、手术时长、术后主要和次要干预措施。手术失败定义为眼压>21 mmHg 或较基线降低<20%、眼压<5 mmHg、术后主要干预措施或光感丧失。相反,成功定义为不存在这些失败标准:无需使用青光眼药物的完全成功,以及使用药物后的合格成功。

结果

两组间的基线特征(包括年龄、性别、眼压、降眼压药物数量和视野缺损)具有可比性(p>0.05)。一年后,两组眼压均显著降低(PF:从 20.13±6.20 mmHg 降至

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa5/12039835/b0509910c088/OPTH-19-1377-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验