Longo Umile Giuseppe, Marino Martina, Nicodemi Guido, Pisani Matteo Giuseppe, Oeding Jacob F, Ley Christophe, Papalia Rocco, Samuelsson Kristian
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma Roma Italy.
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 28;12(2):e70248. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70248. eCollection 2025 Apr.
The aim of the present review is to evaluate and report on the available literature discussing artificial intelligence (AI) applications to the diagnosis of shoulder conditions, outcome prediction of shoulder interventions, and the possible application of such algorithms directly to surgical procedures.
In February 2024, a search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed. Studies had to evaluate AI model effectiveness for inclusion. Research on healthcare cost predictions, deterministic algorithms, patient satisfaction, protocol studies and upper-extremity fractures not involving the shoulder were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools were used to assess bias.
Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. Seven studies analysed the detection of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in magnetic resonance imaging and found area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.812 to 0.94 for the detection of RCTs. One study reported Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics values ranging from 0.79 to 0.97 for the prediction of clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In terms of outcomes of rotator cuff repair, an AUC value ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 was reported for prediction of patient-reported outcome measures, and an AUC range of 0.87-0.92 was found for prediction of retear rate. Five studies evaluated the identification of shoulder implant models following TSA from radiographs, with reported accuracy ranging from 89.90% to 97.20%.
AI application enables forecasting of clinical outcomes, permits refined diagnostic evaluation and increases surgical accuracy. While promising, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice requires careful consideration.
Level IV.
本综述旨在评估并报告现有文献中关于人工智能(AI)在肩部疾病诊断、肩部干预结果预测以及此类算法直接应用于外科手术方面的应用情况。
2024年2月,对PubMed、Cochrane和Scopus数据库进行了检索。纳入的研究必须评估AI模型的有效性。排除了关于医疗成本预测、确定性算法、患者满意度、方案研究以及不涉及肩部的上肢骨折的研究。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具和干预非随机研究中的偏倚风险工具来评估偏倚。
33项研究纳入分析。7项研究分析了磁共振成像中肩袖撕裂(RCT)的检测情况,发现检测RCT的曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.812至0.94之间。一项研究报告了在预测反向全肩关节置换术后临床结果时,受试者操作特征曲线下面积值在0.79至0.97之间。就肩袖修复的结果而言,预测患者报告的结局指标时AUC值在0.58至0.68之间,预测再撕裂率时AUC范围为0.87 - 0.92。5项研究评估了从X线片识别全肩关节置换术后肩部植入物模型的情况,报告的准确率在89.90%至97.20%之间。
AI应用能够预测临床结果,实现更精确的诊断评估并提高手术准确性。尽管前景广阔,但将这些技术转化为常规临床实践需要谨慎考虑。
四级。