Domzaridou Eleni, Carr Matthew J, Williams David M, Avery Anthony J, van Staa Tjeerd, Rees D Aled, Ashcroft Darren M
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration (GM PSRC), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 May;34(5):e70153. doi: 10.1002/pds.70153.
To examine variation in oral, injectable, and inhaled corticosteroid (CS) prescribing in primary care, exploring treatment persistence and coverage.
We examined patient-level electronic health records from English general practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database. We delineated a cohort of new users of oral, injectable, or inhaled CS with prescriptions issued between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. Lorenz curves assessed potential prescribing skewness, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots estimated treatment persistence. The Proportion of Patients Covered (PPC) method estimated the proportion of patients still covered by treatment 1 year after initiation.
We observed 1 942 571 CS users across 1471 general practices, with 20% of oral and inhaled CS users accounting for almost 80% of total CS use. Older patients with comorbidities including respiratory diseases (13.5%), skin conditions (5.8%), or inflammatory bowel diseases (1.6%) were more likely to be prescribed higher doses. The KM plots showed that 20% of oral and 50% of inhaled CS users were persistent after one and 2 months, respectively. The PPC method indicated that 30% of oral and 60% of inhaled CS users were covered by treatment 6 months post-initiation. Some variation was observed when different grace periods were applied. Combined use of oral and inhaled CS was observed for 6.9% of patients.
A fifth of patients receiving CS accounted for over 80% of oral and inhaled CS prescribing in primary care. Identifying these patients is crucial for targeting future interventions to promote patient safety and cost-effective CS use.
研究基层医疗中口服、注射和吸入性皮质类固醇(CS)处方的差异,探讨治疗持续性和覆盖范围。
我们在临床实践研究数据链奥鲁姆数据库中检查了来自英国全科医疗的患者级电子健康记录。我们划定了一组在2000年1月1日至2021年6月30日期间开具过口服、注射或吸入性CS处方的新用户队列。洛伦兹曲线评估潜在处方偏态,卡普兰 - 迈耶(KM)图估计治疗持续性。患者覆盖比例(PPC)方法估计开始治疗1年后仍接受治疗的患者比例。
我们在1471家全科医疗中观察到1942571名CS使用者,其中20%的口服和吸入性CS使用者占CS总使用量的近80%。患有包括呼吸系统疾病(13.5%)、皮肤病(5.8%)或炎症性肠病(1.6%)等合并症的老年患者更有可能被开具高剂量处方。KM图显示,分别有20%的口服CS使用者和50%的吸入性CS使用者在1个月和2个月后仍持续用药。PPC方法表明,开始治疗6个月后,30%的口服CS使用者和60%的吸入性CS使用者仍在接受治疗。应用不同宽限期时观察到了一些差异。6.9%的患者同时使用了口服和吸入性CS。
在基层医疗中,接受CS治疗的患者中有五分之一占口服和吸入性CS处方的80%以上。识别这些患者对于针对性地开展未来干预措施以促进患者安全和CS的成本效益使用至关重要。