Suppr超能文献

在围绕房间里的大象跳舞时把所有鸡蛋放在一个篮子里:健康与经济对话如何需要更好地协调一致。

Putting All Our Eggs in One Basket While Dancing Around the Elephant in the Room: How Health and Economy Conversations Need to Better Align.

作者信息

Crawford Gemma, Trebeck Katherine

机构信息

Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, Curtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Writer-At-Large, Edinburgh Futures Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70050. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70050.

Abstract

This commentary examines a critical paradox in contemporary policymaking that hinders effective action for health equity. On one hand, certain policymakers fixate on economic growth measured by GDP as the solution to societal challenges (putting all their eggs in one basket). Simultaneously, other policymakers acknowledge but ultimately avoid addressing how the economic system fundamentally drives health inequalities (dancing around the elephant in the room). This results in perpetuating a focus on downstream interventions rather than disrupting health's structural and economic determinants. While notable exceptions exist, sustained examples of upstream economic intervention remain scarce. Health promotion practitioners are positioned to challenge this paradox through their core competencies in policy influence, systems thinking, partnership building, and community mobilisation. By supporting policymakers to address power and wealth inequalities that underpin health disparities, health promotion practitioners can help move beyond approaches focused primarily on individual behaviour change. This commentary calls for creative collaborations, new language for conceptualising wellbeing economies, and broader public support to expand what is deemed politically possible in addressing economic causes of health inequalities.

摘要

本评论审视了当代政策制定中一个阻碍实现健康公平有效行动的关键悖论。一方面,某些政策制定者将以国内生产总值衡量的经济增长视为解决社会挑战的办法(孤注一掷)。与此同时,其他政策制定者虽然认识到但最终却回避探讨经济体系如何从根本上导致健康不平等问题(对房间里的大象视而不见)。这导致持续关注下游干预措施,而非打破健康的结构和经济决定因素。虽然存在显著的例外情况,但上游经济干预的持续实例仍然很少。健康促进从业者有能力通过其在政策影响、系统思维、伙伴关系建设和社区动员方面的核心能力来挑战这一悖论。通过支持政策制定者解决造成健康差距的权力和财富不平等问题,健康促进从业者可以帮助超越主要关注个人行为改变的方法。本评论呼吁开展创造性合作,采用新的语言来概念化福祉经济,并获得更广泛的公众支持,以扩大在解决健康不平等的经济成因方面被认为在政治上可行的范围。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Post-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries.
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jan;9(1):e62-e78. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00310-3.
3
Why is health improvement policy so difficult to secure?为何改善健康的政策如此难以落实?
Open Res Eur. 2022 Aug 26;2:76. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14841.2. eCollection 2022.
6
Well-being economy in Australia: Progress, challenges and opportunities.
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Jul;34(3):626-628. doi: 10.1002/hpja.770. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
The well-being economy and health in all policies: Fostering action for change.
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Jul;34(3):623-625. doi: 10.1002/hpja.768. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验