Agrawal Vinisha, Ali Mohammed Farhan, Yasin Froher, Ashraf Daniyal, Brannigan Jamie Fm, Yurac Ratko, Kumar Vishal, Murphy Rory, Tessitore Enrico, Molliqaj Granit, Dejaegher Joost, Zamorano Juan José, Wynne-Jones Guy, Tripathi Manjul, Anderson David B, F Arbatin Jose Joefrey, Kato So, Jayapalan Ronie Romelean, Dea Nicolas, Harrop James S, Wilson Jefferson, Kwon Brian K, Martin Allan R, Bednarik Josef, Kotter Mark R, Davies Benjamin M, Mowforth Oliver D, Nouri Aria
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr 30:21925682251339480. doi: 10.1177/21925682251339480.
Study DesignSystematic review.ObjectivesThe pre-symptomatic state of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM), wherein degenerative changes and spinal cord compression are seen without clinical findings, is poorly understood and inconsistently categorised. Clear identification may elucidate the temporality of DCM development. Therefore, a systematic assessment was undertaken of current terminology for pre-DCM states, with the objective of standardising definitions and informing an AO Spine expert position statement.MethodsMedline and Embase were searched for all studies on asymptomatic spinal compression or clinical findings preceding DCM, returning 3585 studies. After screening, 96 studies were included in the final analysis. The terminology used for pre-DCM states and their definitions were extracted, along with their frequencies or speciality/country of author in the literature.ResultsMultiple terms were used to represent pre-DCM stages, including "" (86 studies), "" (26 studies), "without myelopathy" (15 studies), "" (9 studies) and "" (7 studies). "" was associated with the greatest inconsistency. Some defined this as patients with radiological signs of spinal degeneration with/without spinal cord compression but no clinical signs of myelopathy, whereas others used the term synonymously with healthy controls. This inconsistency is particularly challenging in clinical studies in which DCM patients are compared to those with pre-DCM states and/or healthy volunteers.ConclusionThere is substantial inconsistency in the terms used to describe pre-DCM states. There is no clear relationship between the terms used and the country or speciality of the main author. Standardised definitions for these disease states should be agreed and used in future studies.
研究设计
系统评价。
目的
退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)的症状前期状态,即存在退行性改变和脊髓受压但无临床表现,目前对此了解甚少且分类不一致。明确识别可能有助于阐明DCM发展的时间顺序。因此,对DCM前期状态的当前术语进行了系统评估,目的是规范定义并为AO脊柱专家立场声明提供参考。
方法
在Medline和Embase数据库中检索所有关于DCM之前的无症状脊髓受压或临床表现的研究,共检索到3585项研究。经过筛选,最终分析纳入了96项研究。提取了用于DCM前期状态的术语及其定义,以及它们在文献中的出现频率或作者的专业/国家。
结果
有多个术语用于表示DCM前期阶段,包括“”(86项研究)、“”(26项研究)、“无脊髓病”(15项研究)、“”(9项研究)和“”(7项研究)。“”的使用存在最大的不一致性。一些人将其定义为有/无脊髓受压的脊柱退变影像学征象但无脊髓病临床体征的患者,而另一些人则将该术语与健康对照同义使用。这种不一致性在将DCM患者与DCM前期状态患者和/或健康志愿者进行比较的临床研究中尤其具有挑战性。
结论
用于描述DCM前期状态的术语存在很大的不一致性。所使用的术语与主要作者的国家或专业之间没有明确的关系。这些疾病状态的标准化定义应达成共识并在未来的研究中使用。