Suppr超能文献

氟化物涂剂安全吗?:验证氟化物涂剂的安全性。

Is fluoride varnish safe?: Validating the safety of fluoride varnish.

作者信息

Mascarenhas Ana Karina

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 May;152(5):364-368. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluoride varnish is widely used in dentistry as a caries preventive measure with recommendations for its use even in infants. In addition, nondental providers are also applying varnish on children's teeth in various settings. However, there are questions from these nondental providers as to the safety of fluoride varnish.

METHODS

To evaluate and describe the adverse events (AEs) related to fluoride varnish, the US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was used. AEs reported for the dental product code for "varnish, cavity," "varnish," and "fluoride" were evaluated. The identified AEs were then reviewed and categorized using appropriate key words for the various signs and symptoms, outcomes, and treatment.

RESULTS

Over the 10-year period, only 65 AEs were reported for fluoride varnish products. Swelling (33.8%); burning, itching, or soreness (23.1%); and rash (16.9%) were the most common signs and symptoms reported. The most common site reported was the lips (27.7%). The most common outcome was that the patient was taken to the hospital (18.5%) or emergency department (15.4%). No deaths were reported. The patients were treated primarily using diphenhydramine (Benadryl, Johnson & Johnson Consumer) (26.1%), followed by an epinephrine autoinjector (EpiPen, Mylan) and other forms of epinephrine (15.4%), and prednisolone (9.2%). In 16.9% of the cases with AEs there was a history of allergies. The rate of AEs is estimated to be between 0.099 and 0.105 per million for fluoride varnish. A concern is the likelihood of underreporting AEs in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the widespread use of fluoride varnish in the United States, the number of AEs reported to the US Food and Drug Administration were few. Thus fluoride varnish can be considered a safe dental product.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Provides data on the safety of fluoride varnish that can be used by the dental profession to allay concerns by nondental providers and patients on this important caries preventive measure.

摘要

背景

氟化物漆在牙科领域被广泛用作预防龋齿的措施,甚至有建议在婴儿中使用。此外,非牙科医疗服务提供者也在各种场合为儿童牙齿涂抹氟化物漆。然而,这些非牙科医疗服务提供者对氟化物漆的安全性存在疑问。

方法

为了评估和描述与氟化物漆相关的不良事件(AE),使用了美国食品药品监督管理局的制造商和用户设施设备经验数据库。对报告的牙科产品代码为“龋齿漆”“漆”和“氟化物”的不良事件进行了评估。然后使用适用于各种体征和症状、结果及治疗的关键词对识别出的不良事件进行审查和分类。

结果

在这10年期间,氟化物漆产品仅报告了65起不良事件。肿胀(33.8%);灼痛、瘙痒或酸痛(23.1%);皮疹(16.9%)是报告的最常见体征和症状。报告的最常见部位是嘴唇(27.7%)。最常见的结果是患者被送往医院(18.5%)或急诊室(15.4%)。未报告死亡病例。患者主要使用苯海拉明(苯那君,强生消费者保健公司)进行治疗(26.1%),其次是肾上腺素自动注射器(肾上腺素笔,迈兰公司)和其他形式的肾上腺素(15.4%),以及泼尼松龙(9.2%)。在16.9%的不良事件病例中,有过敏史。氟化物漆的不良事件发生率估计为每百万例中有0.099至0.105例。一个问题是制造商和用户设施设备经验数据库中不良事件漏报的可能性。

结论

鉴于氟化物漆在美国的广泛使用,向美国食品药品监督管理局报告的不良事件数量很少。因此,氟化物漆可被视为一种安全的牙科产品。

实际意义

提供了氟化物漆安全性的数据,牙科专业人员可利用这些数据来减轻非牙科医疗服务提供者和患者对这一重要龋齿预防措施的担忧。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验