Butler Jorie M, Doubleday Alyssa, Sattar Usman, Nies Mary, Jeppesen Amanda, Wright Melanie, Reese Thomas, Kawamoto Kensaku, Fiol Guilherme Del, Madaras-Kelly Karl
Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation, Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):377-392. doi: 10.1055/a-2505-7743. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions and preferences of prototype intelligence augmentation (IA)-based visualization displays of in-hospital deterioration risk scores to inform future user interface design and implementation in clinical care.
Prototype visualization displays incorporating an IA-based early warning score (EWS) for in-hospital deterioration were developed using cognitive theory and user-centered design principles. The displays featured variations of EWS and clinical data arranged in multipatient and single-patient views. Physician and nurse participants with at least 5 years of clinical experience were recruited to participate in semistructured qualitative interviews focused on understanding their experiences with IA and thoughts and preferences about the prototype displays. A thematic analysis was performed on these data.
Six themes were identified: (1) clinicians perceive IA as valuable with some caveats related to function and context; (2) individual differences among users influence preferences for customizability; (3) EWS are particularly useful for patient triage; (4) need for patient-centered contextual information to complement EWS; (5) perspectives related to understanding the EWS composition; and (6) design preferences that focus on clarity for interpretation of information.
This study demonstrates clinicians' interest in and reservations about IA tools for clinical deterioration. The findings underscore the importance of understanding clinicians' cognitive needs and framing IA-generated tools as complementary to support them. A clinician focuses on high-level pattern matching information, and clinician's comments related to the power of consistency with typical views (e.g., this is "how I usually see things"), and questions regarding support of score interpretation (e.g., age of the data, questions about what the model "knows") suggest some of the challenges of IA implementation. The findings also identify design implications including the need for contextualizing the EWS for the patient's specific situation, incorporating trend information, and explaining the display purpose for clinical use.
本研究旨在探讨临床医生对基于智能增强(IA)的院内病情恶化风险评分可视化显示的看法和偏好,以为未来临床护理中用户界面的设计和实施提供参考。
运用认知理论和以用户为中心的设计原则,开发了包含基于IA的院内病情恶化预警评分(EWS)的原型可视化显示。这些显示呈现了EWS和临床数据在多患者视图和单患者视图中的不同排列方式。招募了具有至少5年临床经验的医生和护士参与者,参与半结构化定性访谈,重点了解他们使用IA的经验以及对原型显示的想法和偏好。对这些数据进行了主题分析。
确定了六个主题:(1)临床医生认为IA有价值,但在功能和背景方面存在一些注意事项;(2)用户之间的个体差异影响对可定制性的偏好;(3)EWS对患者分诊特别有用;(4)需要以患者为中心的背景信息来补充EWS;(5)与理解EWS组成相关的观点;(6)侧重于信息解释清晰度的设计偏好。
本研究表明临床医生对用于临床病情恶化的IA工具感兴趣并有所保留。研究结果强调了理解临床医生认知需求以及将IA生成的工具作为补充以支持他们的重要性。临床医生专注于高层次的模式匹配信息,以及与典型视图一致性的力量相关的评论(例如,这是“我通常看待事物的方式”),还有关于评分解释支持的问题(例如,数据的时效性,关于模型“知道什么”的问题),这些都表明了IA实施中的一些挑战。研究结果还确定了设计方面的影响,包括需要根据患者的具体情况对EWS进行情境化、纳入趋势信息以及解释临床使用的显示目的。