• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-national variation in faith sharing across religious traditions.不同宗教传统间信仰分享的跨国差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):13299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83531-z.
2
Religious centrality across 22 countries.22个国家的宗教中心地位。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99183-6.
3
Religion, spirituality and mental health in the West and the Middle East.宗教、精神信仰与心理健康:西方与中东地区的比较
Asian J Psychiatr. 2012 Jun;5(2):180-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 18.
4
Religion in America--1972-2006: religious affiliation, attendance, and strength of faith.美国的宗教——1972年至2006年:宗教归属、宗教活动参与情况及信仰强度
Psychol Rep. 2010 Jun;106(3):875-90. doi: 10.2466/pr0.106.3.875-890.
5
Missed opportunities for religious organizations to support people living with HIV/AIDS: findings from Tanzania.宗教组织为艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者提供支持的错失机会:来自坦桑尼亚的调查结果
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009 May;23(5):389-94. doi: 10.1089/apc.2008.0195.
6
A religious diversity tale: a multi-faith case study.一个宗教多样性的故事:一个多信仰的案例研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Jun;37(3-4):211-8. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9044-5.
7
Varieties of social experience: The religious cultural context of diverse spiritual exemplars.社会经验的多样性:不同精神典范的宗教文化背景。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2017 Mar;35(1):127-141. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12181.
8
Contraceptive patterns of religious and racial groups in the United States, 1955-76: convergence and distinctiveness.1955 - 1976年美国宗教和种族群体的避孕模式:趋同与独特性
Stud Fam Plann. 1984 May-Jun;15(3):101-11.
9
The Coping Mechanisms and Strategies of Hypertension Patients in Ghana: The Role of Religious Faith, Beliefs and Practices.加纳高血压患者的应对机制与策略:宗教信仰、信念及实践的作用
J Relig Health. 2018 Aug;57(4):1402-1412. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0517-7.
10
Religious leaders' perceptions of advance care planning: a secondary analysis of interviews with Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Islamic, Jewish, Sikh and Bahá'í leaders.宗教领袖对预先医疗护理计划的看法:对与佛教、基督教、印度教、伊斯兰教、犹太教、锡克教和巴哈伊教领袖的访谈进行二次分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 28;16(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0239-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing.全球繁荣研究问卷的开发:勾勒一份新的109项人类繁荣量表的演变历程。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9.
2
Analytic methodology for demographic variation analyses for wave 1 of the global flourishing study.全球繁荣研究第一波人口统计学变异分析的分析方法。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00140-2.
3
Religious centrality across 22 countries.22个国家的宗教中心地位。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99183-6.
4
Why are Women More Religious than Men? Do Risk Preferences and Genetic Risk Predispositions Explain the Gender Gap?为什么女性比男性更笃信宗教?风险偏好和遗传风险倾向能解释这种性别差异吗?
J Sci Study Relig. 2020 Jun;59(2):289-310. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12657. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
The harmonic mean -value for combining dependent tests.合并相关检验的调和平均值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 22;116(4):1195-1200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814092116. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
6
SOME DESIRABLE PROPERTIES OF THE BONFERRONI CORRECTION: IS THE BONFERRONI CORRECTION REALLY SO BAD?邦费罗尼校正的一些理想特性:邦费罗尼校正真的那么糟糕吗?
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar 1;188(3):617-618. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy250.
7
On the promotion of human flourishing.论人类繁荣的提升。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):8148-8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.Meta 分析中固定效应模型和随机效应模型的基本介绍。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
9
Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.流行病学和临床研究中缺失数据的多重填补:潜力与陷阱
BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.

不同宗教传统间信仰分享的跨国差异。

Cross-national variation in faith sharing across religious traditions.

作者信息

Woodberry Robert D, Bradshaw Matt, Vander Weele Tyler J, Johnson Byron R

机构信息

Institute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, One Bear Place 97236, Waco, TX, 76798, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):13299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83531-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-83531-z
PMID:40307291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12043944/
Abstract

Who shares their faith with people who have different religious views? This article examines 'faith sharing' across 22 religiously diverse countries. To our knowledge, this is the first study of 'faith sharing' across national and religious contexts. Evangelism can be controversial, but both historically and in our data, it is widespread-including in societies that restrict religious liberty. 'Faith sharing' is lowest in Europe, Japan, Australia, and the US and highest in Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia (excluding Japan). Within countries, there is no consistent pattern about which religious groups share their faith more. Previous research about 'faith sharing' focuses on Christians in the US, but the factors that predict 'faith sharing' in the US often do not generalize. In fact, the association with age, education, marital status, employment status, and immigration status is exactly the opposite in many societies. Because past comparative research ignores this topic and because so much of what we think we know about faith sharing is based on US Christians, we hope this article will spur further research and expand our understanding of religious persuasion and global religious change.

摘要

谁会与持有不同宗教观点的人分享自己的信仰呢?本文考察了22个宗教多元化国家中的“信仰分享”情况。据我们所知,这是第一项跨越国家和宗教背景对“信仰分享”进行的研究。传教可能会引发争议,但无论是在历史上还是在我们的数据中,它都很普遍——包括在那些限制宗教自由的社会中。“信仰分享”在欧洲、日本、澳大利亚和美国最低,而在非洲、拉丁美洲、中东和亚洲(不包括日本)最高。在各个国家内部,关于哪些宗教团体更愿意分享其信仰,并没有一致的模式。先前关于“信仰分享”的研究主要集中在美国的基督徒身上,但在美国预测“信仰分享”的因素往往并不具有普遍性。事实上,在许多社会中,与年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况、就业状况和移民身份的关联恰恰相反。由于过去的比较研究忽略了这个话题,而且我们对信仰分享的许多认知都基于美国的基督徒,我们希望本文能激发进一步的研究,并扩展我们对宗教劝导和全球宗教变化的理解。