Suppr超能文献

全球繁荣研究问卷的开发:勾勒一份新的109项人类繁荣量表的演变历程。

The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing.

作者信息

Lomas Tim, Bradshaw Matt, Case Brendan, Cowden Richard G, Crabtree Steve, English Cynthia, Fogleman Alex, Johnson Kathryn A, Ritter Zacc, Johnson Byron R, VanderWeele Tyler J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Human Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9.

Abstract

Given the well-founded critiques of academia as Western-centric, there are increasing efforts to conduct research that is more cross-cultural and global. These dynamics apply to all aspects of life, including human flourishing, as exemplified by the new Global Flourishing Study (GFS), a longitudinal panel study investigating the predictors and components of flourishing across over 200,000 participants from 22 geographically and culturally diverse countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong [S.A.R of China, with mainland China also included from 2024 onwards], Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Tanzania, Turkey, UK, and USA). The research is not only comprehensive in its global reach but also its conceptual coverage of flourishing, involving 109 distinct questions (comprising a one-off intake survey of 43 items and an annual survey of 71 items, with five items shared by both). This paper elucidates the questionnaire development process, giving a transparent and open accounting of its multi-phase construction. By describing this process in detail, this article not only articulates the nature of the GFS but also serves as a useful resource in the survey development literature more broadly (e.g., for scholars undertaking similar endeavors).

摘要

鉴于学术界以西方为中心的观点受到了合理的批评,人们越来越努力开展更具跨文化和全球性的研究。这些动态适用于生活的方方面面,包括人类的幸福,新的全球幸福研究(GFS)就是一个例证。这是一项纵向跟踪研究,调查了来自22个地理和文化多样的国家(阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西、中国香港[中国特别行政区,从2024年起也包括中国大陆]、埃及、德国、印度、印度尼西亚、以色列、日本、肯尼亚、墨西哥、尼日利亚、菲律宾、波兰、南非、西班牙、瑞典、坦桑尼亚、土耳其、英国和美国)的20多万参与者幸福的预测因素和构成要素。该研究不仅在全球范围具有全面性,而且在幸福的概念涵盖方面也是如此,涉及109个不同的问题(包括一次包含43个项目的初始调查和一次包含71个项目的年度调查,其中有5个项目是两者共有的)。本文阐述了问卷的开发过程,对其多阶段构建进行了透明和公开的说明。通过详细描述这一过程,本文不仅阐明了全球幸福研究的性质,而且更广泛地为调查开发文献提供了有用的资源(例如,对于从事类似研究的学者)。

相似文献

2
3
Childhood predictors of balance in life: a cross-national analysis of the global flourishing study.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):13301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89853-w.
6
Poliomyelitis in 1953.
Bull World Health Organ. 1955;12(4):595-649.
7
Human Flourishing in Cross Cultural Settings. Evidence From the United States, China, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, and Mexico.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 29;10:1269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01269. eCollection 2019.
8
Survey sampling design in wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01167-9.
9
The pill in figures and facts.
Adv Fertil Control. 1967;2:1-5.

引用本文的文献

2
The roots of belonging: childhood predictors of belonging in 22 countries.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):30215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14410-4.
7
Childhood Predictors of Dispositional Forgivingness in Adulthood: A Cross-National Analysis with 22 Countries.
Appl Res Qual Life. 2025;20(3):1057-1084. doi: 10.1007/s11482-025-10451-z. Epub 2025 May 7.
8
Seeds of Hope: Cross-National Analysis of Childhood Predictors of Hope in 22 Countries.
Appl Res Qual Life. 2025;20(3):1111-1137. doi: 10.1007/s11482-025-10450-0. Epub 2025 May 19.
9
A cross-national analysis of childhood predictors of physical pain.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 7;5(1):337. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00997-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Survey sampling design in wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01167-9.
2
Terminology and the Well-being Literature.
Affect Sci. 2022 Oct 11;4(1):36-40. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00153-2. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
The Garden and the Orchestra: Generative Metaphors for Conceptualizing the Complexities of Well-Being.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 5;19(21):14544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114544.
5
It's time to reimagine sample diversity and retire the WEIRD dichotomy.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):971-972. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01175-9.
6
Psychometric Properties of Flourishing Scales From a Comprehensive Well-Being Assessment.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 21;12:652209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652209. eCollection 2021.
7
The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):116-129. doi: 10.1037/amp0000622. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
8
Emerging good practices for Translatability Assessment (TA) of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0035-8. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
On the promotion of human flourishing.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):8148-8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being.
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):837-861. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验