Qie Guangyuan, Wan Miao, Cui Mengdie, Xia Wen, Liu Qianqian
General Medicine Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03922-y.
To study the effect of active wound dressing on postoperative pain and wound healing in patients undergoing anorectal surgery (AS).
The clinical data of 110 AS patients from March 2023 to January 2024 were retrospectively screened. The study group (SG) included 55 patients who received active wound dressing post-operation, while the control group (CG) consisted of 55 patients who received conventional dressing, matched for baseline indices. Postoperative pain degree, wound healing rate, healing time, swelling disappearance time, dressing change times, granulation tissue formation time, growth factor levels, and inflammatory factor levels were compared between the groups.
There were notable variations in the time effect, inter-group effect and time × inter-group effect in the postoperative pain score and wound healing rate between the two groups (P < 0.05). The pain scores of the SG on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after operation were lower (P < 0.05). The wound healing rate of the SG was higher on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after operation (P < 0.05). The wound healing time, wound swelling disappearance time, dressing change times and granulation tissue formation time in the SG were shorter (P < 0.05). The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in the SG were higher (P < 0.05). The levels of IL -8 and TNF-α in the SG were lower (P < 0.05).
Active wound dressing has been shown to alleviate postoperative pain in patients undergoing AS, promote wound healing, and effectively regulate levels of growth factors and inflammatory factors.
研究活性伤口敷料对肛肠手术(AS)患者术后疼痛及伤口愈合的影响。
回顾性筛选2023年3月至2024年1月110例AS患者的临床资料。研究组(SG)包括55例术后接受活性伤口敷料的患者,对照组(CG)由55例接受传统敷料的患者组成,两组基线指标匹配。比较两组术后疼痛程度、伤口愈合率、愈合时间、肿胀消失时间、换药次数、肉芽组织形成时间、生长因子水平及炎症因子水平。
两组术后疼痛评分及伤口愈合率的时间效应、组间效应及时间×组间效应存在显著差异(P<0.05)。研究组术后第1、3、7天的疼痛评分较低(P<0.05)。研究组术后第1、3、7天的伤口愈合率较高(P<0.05)。研究组的伤口愈合时间、伤口肿胀消失时间、换药次数及肉芽组织形成时间较短(P<0.05)。研究组血管内皮生长因子、表皮生长因子及碱性成纤维细胞生长因子水平较高(P<0.05)。研究组白细胞介素-8和肿瘤坏死因子-α水平较低(P<0.05)。
活性伤口敷料已被证明可减轻AS患者的术后疼痛,促进伤口愈合,并有效调节生长因子和炎症因子水平。