• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索机器学习在胃癌中的潜力:预后生物标志物、亚型分类及分层

Exploring the potential of machine learning in gastric cancer: prognostic biomarkers, subtyping, and stratification.

作者信息

Rafiepoor Haniyeh, Banoei Mohammad M, Ghorbankhanloo Alireza, Muhammadnejad Ahad, Razavirad Amirhossein, Soleymanjahi Saeed, Amanpour Saeid

机构信息

Cancer Biology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Keshavarz Blvd, Building, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14204-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-14204-x
PMID:40307780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12042310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advancements in the management of gastric cancer (GC) and innovative therapeutic approaches highlight the significance of the role of biomarkers in GC prognosis. Machine-learning (ML)-based methods can be applied to identify the most important predictors and unravel their interactions to classify patients, which might guide prioritized treatment decisions.

METHODS

A total of 140 patients with histopathological confirmed GC who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2016 were enrolled in the study. The inspired modification of the partial least squares (SIMPLS)-based model was used to identify the most significant predictors and interactions between variables. Predictive partition analysis was employed to establish the decision tree model to prioritize markers for clinical use. ML models have also been developed to predict TNM stage and different subtypes of GC. Latent class analysis (LCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were carried out to cluster the GC patients and to find a subgroup of survivors who tended to die.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that the SIMPLS method was able to predict the mortality of GC patients with high predictabilities (Q = 0.45-0.70). The analysis identified MMP-7, P53, Ki67, and vimentin as the top predictors. Correlation analysis revealed different patterns of prognostic markers in the non-survivor and survivor cohorts and different GC subtypes. The main prediction models were verified via other ML-based analyses, with a high area under the curve (AUC) (0.84-0.99), specificity (0.82-0.99) and sensitivity (0.87-0.99). Patients were classified into three clusters of mortality risk, which highlighted the most significant mortality predictors. Partition analysis prioritizes the most significant predictors P53 ≥ 6, COX-2 > 2, vimentin > 2, Ki67 ≥ 13 in mortality of patients (AUC = 0.85-0.90).

CONCLUSION

The present study highlights the importance of considering multiple variables and their interactions to predict the prognosis of mortality and stage in GC patients through ML-based techniques. These findings suggest that the incorporation of molecular biomarkers may enhance patient prognosis compared to relying solely on clinical factors. Furthermore, they demonstrate the potential for personalized medicine in GC treatment by identifying high-risk patients for early intervention and optimizing therapeutic strategies. The partition analysis technique offers a practical tool for identifying cutoffs and prioritizing markers for clinical application. Additionally, providing Clinical Decision Support systems with predictive tools can assist clinicians and pathologists in identifying aggressive cases, thereby improving patient outcomes while minimizing unnecessary treatments. Overall, this study contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve patient outcomes by advancing our comprehension of the intricate nature of GC.

摘要

背景

胃癌(GC)管理方面的进展和创新治疗方法凸显了生物标志物在GC预后中作用的重要性。基于机器学习(ML)的方法可用于识别最重要的预测指标并揭示它们之间的相互作用以对患者进行分类,这可能有助于指导优先治疗决策。

方法

共有140例在2011年至2016年间接受手术且经组织病理学确诊为GC的患者纳入本研究。基于改进的偏最小二乘法(SIMPLS)模型用于识别最显著的预测指标以及变量之间的相互作用。采用预测性划分分析建立决策树模型,以确定临床使用的优先标志物。还开发了ML模型来预测GC的TNM分期和不同亚型。进行潜在类别分析(LCA)和主成分分析(PCA)以对GC患者进行聚类,并找出倾向于死亡的存活者亚组。

结果

研究结果显示,SIMPLS方法能够以较高的预测能力预测GC患者的死亡率(Q = 0.45 - 0.70)。分析确定基质金属蛋白酶-7(MMP-7)、P53、Ki67和波形蛋白为首要预测指标。相关性分析揭示了非存活者和存活者队列以及不同GC亚型中预后标志物的不同模式。主要预测模型通过其他基于ML的分析得到验证,曲线下面积(AUC)较高(0.84 - 0.99),特异性(0.82 - 0.99)和敏感性(0.87 - 0.99)。患者被分为三个死亡风险类别,突出了最显著的死亡预测指标。划分分析确定患者死亡时最重要的预测指标为P53≥6、环氧合酶-2(COX-2)>2、波形蛋白>2、Ki67≥13(AUC = 0.85 - 0.90)。

结论

本研究强调了通过基于ML的技术考虑多个变量及其相互作用以预测GC患者死亡率和分期预后的重要性。这些发现表明,与仅依赖临床因素相比,纳入分子生物标志物可能会改善患者预后。此外,它们通过识别高危患者进行早期干预和优化治疗策略,证明了GC治疗中个性化医疗的潜力。划分分析技术为确定临界值和确定临床应用标志物的优先级提供了实用工具。此外,为临床决策支持系统提供预测工具可帮助临床医生和病理学家识别侵袭性病例,从而在尽量减少不必要治疗的同时改善患者结局。总体而言,本研究通过加深我们对GC复杂本质的理解,为改善患者结局的持续努力做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/db91c39e7ac1/12885_2025_14204_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/863605852e4d/12885_2025_14204_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/9e76f35aed25/12885_2025_14204_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/2e24549e0527/12885_2025_14204_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/e1f111cfa896/12885_2025_14204_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/db91c39e7ac1/12885_2025_14204_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/863605852e4d/12885_2025_14204_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/9e76f35aed25/12885_2025_14204_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/2e24549e0527/12885_2025_14204_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/e1f111cfa896/12885_2025_14204_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaaa/12042310/db91c39e7ac1/12885_2025_14204_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the potential of machine learning in gastric cancer: prognostic biomarkers, subtyping, and stratification.探索机器学习在胃癌中的潜力:预后生物标志物、亚型分类及分层
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14204-x.
2
Machine-learning-based COVID-19 mortality prediction model and identification of patients at low and high risk of dying.基于机器学习的 COVID-19 死亡率预测模型和识别低危与高危死亡风险患者。
Crit Care. 2021 Sep 8;25(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03749-5.
3
Identification of a Tumor Microenvironment-relevant Gene set-based Prognostic Signature and Related Therapy Targets in Gastric Cancer.基于肿瘤微环境相关基因集的胃癌预后特征及相关治疗靶点的鉴定。
Theranostics. 2020 Jul 9;10(19):8633-8647. doi: 10.7150/thno.47938. eCollection 2020.
4
Unraveling complex relationships between COVID-19 risk factors using machine learning based models for predicting mortality of hospitalized patients and identification of high-risk group: a large retrospective study.使用基于机器学习的模型来揭示新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)风险因素之间的复杂关系,以预测住院患者的死亡率并识别高危人群:一项大型回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 4;10:1170331. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1170331. eCollection 2023.
5
Cluster classification of a Brazilian gastric cancer cohort reveals remarkable populational differences in normal p53 rate.对巴西胃癌队列的聚类分类揭示了正常p53率存在显著的人群差异。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Sep 30;22:eAO0508. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0508. eCollection 2024.
6
Development and validation of a prognostic prediction model for elderly gastric cancer patients based on oxidative stress biochemical markers.基于氧化应激生化标志物的老年胃癌患者预后预测模型的构建与验证
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13545-x.
7
Development and validation of an inflammatory biomarkers model to predict gastric cancer prognosis: a multi-center cohort study in China.炎症生物标志物模型的建立和验证,以预测胃癌的预后:来自中国多中心队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12483-4.
8
Immunomarker Support Vector Machine Classifier for Prediction of Gastric Cancer Survival and Adjuvant Chemotherapeutic Benefit.免疫标志物支持向量机分类器预测胃癌生存和辅助化疗获益。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 15;24(22):5574-5584. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0848. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
9
Microsatellite-Stable Gastric Cancer Can be Classified into 2 Molecular Subtypes with Different Immunotherapy Response and Prognosis Based on Gene Sequencing and Computational Pathology.基于基因测序和计算病理学,微卫星稳定型胃癌可分为2种具有不同免疫治疗反应和预后的分子亚型。
Lab Invest. 2025 Apr;105(4):104101. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104101. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
10
Machine Learning-Based Computational Models Derived From Large-Scale Radiographic-Radiomic Images Can Help Predict Adverse Histopathological Status of Gastric Cancer.基于机器学习的大型影像学-影像组学计算模型有助于预测胃癌不良病理状态。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct;10(10):e00079. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000079.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a fusion model based on multi-phase contrast CT radiomics combined with clinical features for predicting Ki-67 expression in gastric cancer.基于多期增强CT影像组学联合临床特征的融合模型用于预测胃癌中Ki-67表达的开发与验证
Biomed Rep. 2025 May 16;23(1):118. doi: 10.3892/br.2025.1996. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival of gastric cancer patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗胃癌患者的生存率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023;16(3):245-258. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2674.
2
Unraveling complex relationships between COVID-19 risk factors using machine learning based models for predicting mortality of hospitalized patients and identification of high-risk group: a large retrospective study.使用基于机器学习的模型来揭示新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)风险因素之间的复杂关系,以预测住院患者的死亡率并识别高危人群:一项大型回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 4;10:1170331. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1170331. eCollection 2023.
3
Predicting postoperative gastric cancer prognosis based on inflammatory factors and machine learning technology.
基于炎症因子和机器学习技术预测胃癌术后预后。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02150-2.
4
The inaccuracies of gastric adenocarcinoma clinical staging and its predictive factors.胃腺癌临床分期及其预测因素的不准确性。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1116-1124. doi: 10.1002/jso.27233. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
5
Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications.机器学习应用中确定样本量的评估。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Feb 14;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05156-9.
6
A standardized pathology report for gastric cancer: 2nd edition.《胃癌标准化病理报告:第2版》
J Pathol Transl Med. 2023 Jan;57(1):1-27. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2022.12.23. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
7
Survival prediction of stomach cancer using expression data and deep learning models with histopathological images.利用表达数据和具有组织病理学图像的深度学习模型进行胃癌生存预测。
Cancer Sci. 2023 Feb;114(2):690-701. doi: 10.1111/cas.15592. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
8
Associations of CD34, Ki67, layer of invasion and clinical pathological characteristics, prognosis outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors-a retrospective cohort study.CD34、Ki67、浸润层与胃肠道间质瘤临床病理特征及预后结局的相关性——一项回顾性队列研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Aug;11(8):2866-2875. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1777.
9
Advances in molecular biomarkers research and clinical application progress for gastric cancer immunotherapy.胃癌免疫治疗的分子生物标志物研究进展与临床应用进展
Biomark Res. 2022 Aug 30;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40364-022-00413-0.
10
Predicting response to immunotherapy in gastric cancer via multi-dimensional analyses of the tumour immune microenvironment.通过肿瘤免疫微环境的多维分析预测胃癌对免疫治疗的反应。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 18;13(1):4851. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32570-z.