Sidiq Mohammad, Ravichandran Hariharasudhan, Janakiraman Balamurugan, Chahal Aksh, Rai Richa Hirendra, Alotaibi Ahmed Hamoud, Alotaibi Ali Hamoud, Alotaibi Abdullah Saad, Ibrahim Aminu Alhassan, Alharbi Eid Abed, Kashoo Faizan Zaffar, Vats Hemlata
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Alvas College of Physiotherapy and Research Centre, Moodbidri, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India.
Arch Physiother. 2025 Apr 25;15:77-89. doi: 10.33393/aop.2025.3233. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Various physical therapy interventions for coccydynia have been evaluated, but their effectiveness has not yet been comprehensively synthesized. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in adults with coccydynia.
A systematic search of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Outcomes of interest included pain, function, mobility, and patient satisfaction. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, a narrative synthesis was performed.
A total of 515 adults with coccydynia across 10 studies were included in the review. Physical therapy interventions, including extracorporeal shock wave therapy, kinesiotaping plus exercise, levator anus stretching or massage, manipulation alone or manipulation plus electrotherapy or exercise, and muscle energy technique, showed significant improvements in pain and function in the short term. Additionally, kinesiotaping plus exercise showed significant short-term improvement in trunk mobility. In the intermediate term, manipulation alone and levator anus stretching or massage were effective at reducing pain, whereas manipulation alone was effective at improving function. In the long term, levator anus stretching or massage showed sustained improvement in pain.
Overall, physical therapy interventions led to short-term improvements in pain and function for adults with coccydynia. However, there is a need for high-quality studies with long-term follow-ups to compare the efficacy of various physical therapy interventions, both in isolation and in combination.
针对尾骨痛的各种物理治疗干预措施已得到评估,但其有效性尚未得到全面综合。本系统评价旨在评估物理治疗干预措施对成年尾骨痛患者的有效性。
在PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)中对相关随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统检索。感兴趣的结局包括疼痛、功能、活动能力和患者满意度。由于纳入研究的异质性,进行了叙述性综合分析。
该评价共纳入了10项研究中的515名成年尾骨痛患者。物理治疗干预措施,包括体外冲击波治疗、肌内效贴布加运动、提肛拉伸或按摩、单纯手法治疗或手法治疗加电疗或运动,以及肌肉能量技术,在短期内显示出疼痛和功能方面的显著改善。此外,肌内效贴布加运动在短期内显示出躯干活动能力的显著改善。在中期,单纯手法治疗和提肛拉伸或按摩在减轻疼痛方面有效,而单纯手法治疗在改善功能方面有效。在长期,提肛拉伸或按摩在疼痛方面显示出持续改善。
总体而言,物理治疗干预措施使成年尾骨痛患者的疼痛和功能在短期内得到改善。然而,需要进行高质量的长期随访研究,以比较各种物理治疗干预措施单独或联合使用时的疗效。