Mand Simanjit K, Santen Sally A, Hemphill Robin R, Schnapp Benjamin H, Promes Susan B, Shaw Jazmyn, Alvarez Al'ai, Cico Stephen J, Williams Sarah R
BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Apr 29;9(Suppl 1):S24-S28. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70014. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Medical education faculty often take on the responsibility of helping their learners through professional or personal obstacles to achieve individual success. This can be challenging to navigate given the multiple "hats" that an individual faculty educator may wear, including coach, mentor, and advisor. Medical educators may feel uncertain as to which role may be most effective in any given interaction with a learner. Considering each as a communication strategy with unique skill sets and relational principles, rather than as a rigid role, can allow an educator more flexibility to use each approach in learner interactions. The authors discuss the separate modes of the coaching, mentoring, and advising approaches; the critical differences in relational and behavioral skills used; the potential pitfalls with each approach; and how feedback may fit into this framework. Once each approach is mastered, a medical educator may find it most effective to use a blended approach, weaving all three together intentionally, calling on each skill set as the need arises to support the learner.
医学教育工作者常常承担起帮助学习者克服专业或个人障碍以取得个人成功的责任。鉴于个体教师教育者可能扮演多种角色,包括教练、导师和顾问,这可能颇具挑战性。医学教育工作者可能不确定在与学习者的任何特定互动中哪种角色最为有效。将每种角色视为具有独特技能组合和关系原则的沟通策略,而非严格的角色,可使教育者在与学习者互动时更灵活地运用每种方法。作者讨论了教练、指导和咨询方法的不同模式;所使用的关系和行为技能的关键差异;每种方法的潜在陷阱;以及反馈如何融入这一框架。一旦掌握了每种方法,医学教育工作者可能会发现采用混合方法最为有效,即有意将这三种方法交织在一起,根据需要调用每种技能组合来支持学习者。