Reinhardt Lukas, Whitehouse Harvey
Centre for the Study of Social Cohesion, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Identity and Conflict Lab, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 30;12(4):241563. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241563. eCollection 2025 Apr.
The scientific evidence on the harmful consequences of climate change is clear yet appeals to scientific evidence alone may not be enough to inspire sufficient climate action. We analysed the effectiveness of four different speeches in video format delivered by a Global South politician to strengthen psychological bonding with humanity at large and motivate climate action in the form of donations with samples from the US, UK and South Africa. Each speech focused on one core argument: scientific evidence, morality, globally shared life experiences or humanity's shared ancestry. All speeches significantly increased bonding with humanity and donations. On average, the speeches were equally effective at increasing donations. The speech that appealed to humanity's shared ancestry had a stronger effect on bonding with humanity than the other three speeches and the speeches that appealed to globally shared life experiences and humanity's shared ancestry made participants feel less sad, angry and helpless than the speeches that appealed to scientific evidence and morality. We also present evidence on the effects of the speeches delivered by a Western academic in the UK and we discuss implications of our findings for future research and practical efforts to motivate climate action.
气候变化有害后果的科学证据确凿,但仅诉诸科学证据可能不足以激发足够的气候行动。我们分析了一位全球南方政治家以视频形式发表的四种不同演讲的效果,这些演讲旨在加强与广大人类的心理联系,并以来自美国、英国和南非的样本激励以捐赠形式开展的气候行动。每场演讲都聚焦于一个核心论点:科学证据、道德、全球共享的生活经历或人类的共同祖先。所有演讲都显著增强了与人类的联系并增加了捐赠。平均而言,这些演讲在增加捐赠方面效果相当。诉诸人类共同祖先的演讲在增强与人类的联系方面比其他三场演讲效果更强,而且诉诸全球共享生活经历和人类共同祖先的演讲比诉诸科学证据和道德的演讲让参与者感到悲伤、愤怒和无助的程度更低。我们还展示了一位英国西方学者发表的演讲效果的证据,并讨论了我们的研究结果对未来激励气候行动的研究和实际努力的启示。