• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给科学和和平一个机会:诺贝尔奖得主在科学领域的演讲,1901-2018 年。

Give science and peace a chance: Speeches by Nobel laureates in the sciences, 1901-2018.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Oct 8;14(10):e0223505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223505. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0223505
PMID:31593575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6782086/
Abstract

The paper presents the results of a quantitative analysis of speeches by Nobel laureates in the sciences (Physics, Chemistry, Medicine) at the Prize gala dinner throughout the whole history of the Prize, 1901-2018. The results outline key themes and historical trends. A dominant theme, common to most speeches, is the exaltation of science as a profession by the laureate. Since the 1970s, especially in chemistry, this element becomes more domain-specific and less related to science in general. One could speculate whether this happens chiefly in chemistry because its area of activity has been perceived to be at risk of erosion from competing fields (e.g. physics, biology). Over time, speeches become more technical, less ceremonial and more lecture-oriented. Emphasis on broad, beneficial impact of science for humanity and mankind (as emphasised in Nobel's will) is more present in laureates' speeches during the first half of the XXth century, while its relevance clearly declines during the last decades. Politics and its relationship with science is also a relevant topic in Nobel speeches. Particularly between the two World Wars, science is seen as terrain where nationalistic stances and fights among nations could actually find a context for peaceful competition and even cooperation.

摘要

本文呈现了对诺贝尔科学奖(物理学、化学、医学)得主在整个诺贝尔奖历史上(1901-2018 年)在颁奖典礼晚宴上的演讲进行定量分析的结果。这些结果概述了主要主题和历史趋势。一个主导主题是,大多数演讲都将科学作为一种职业加以赞扬。自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,尤其是在化学领域,这一元素变得更加特定于领域,与一般科学的关系较少。人们可能会猜测,这种情况主要是否发生在化学领域,因为其活动领域被认为面临来自竞争领域(如物理、生物)侵蚀的风险。随着时间的推移,演讲变得更加技术性,仪式性更少,讲座式倾向更强。强调科学对人类和全人类的广泛有益影响(如诺贝尔遗嘱中所强调的)在 20 世纪上半叶的得主演讲中更为突出,而在过去几十年中,其相关性明显下降。政治及其与科学的关系也是诺贝尔演讲中的一个相关主题。特别是在两次世界大战之间,科学被视为一个领域,民族主义立场和国家之间的斗争实际上可以在那里找到和平竞争甚至合作的背景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/250055e55737/pone.0223505.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/96462ca2824b/pone.0223505.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/45c74f2e9390/pone.0223505.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/b6b98da13e40/pone.0223505.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/e8499035393b/pone.0223505.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/250055e55737/pone.0223505.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/96462ca2824b/pone.0223505.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/45c74f2e9390/pone.0223505.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/b6b98da13e40/pone.0223505.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/e8499035393b/pone.0223505.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62dd/6782086/250055e55737/pone.0223505.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Give science and peace a chance: Speeches by Nobel laureates in the sciences, 1901-2018.给科学和和平一个机会:诺贝尔奖得主在科学领域的演讲,1901-2018 年。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 8;14(10):e0223505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223505. eCollection 2019.
2
Why there should be more science Nobel prizes and laureates - And why proportionate credit should be awarded to institutions.为何应该设立更多诺贝尔科学奖奖项以及获奖者——以及为何应给予各机构相应的荣誉。
Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(3):471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
3
Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.制度环境与科学突破:法国、德国、英国和美国的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239805. eCollection 2020.
4
[Nobel laureates and cancer].[诺贝尔奖获得者与癌症]
Rev Med Chil. 2023 Oct;151(10):1367-1374. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872023001001367.
5
Work honored by Nobel prizes clusters heavily in a few scientific fields.获得诺贝尔奖的工作主要集中在少数几个科学领域。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0234612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234612. eCollection 2020.
6
Nobel laureates in the history of the vitamins.历史上的维生素诺贝尔奖得主。
Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;61(3):265-9. doi: 10.1159/000343122. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
7
[Commentary on the Nobel Prize that has been granted in Medicine-Physiology, Chemistry and Physics to noteable investigators].[关于授予杰出研究人员的诺贝尔医学-生理学奖、化学奖和物理学奖的评论]
Gac Med Mex. 2015 Mar-Apr;151(2):281-6.
8
[The first three Nordic Nobel laureates in physiology or medicine].[首批三位北欧生理学或医学领域诺贝尔奖获得者]
Sven Med Tidskr. 1997;1(1):147-68.
9
Family background and genius II: Nobel laureates in science.家庭背景与天赋II:科学领域的诺贝尔奖获得者
Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;50(14):918-25. doi: 10.1177/070674370505001406.
10
The Colombian scientific elite-Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator.哥伦比亚科学界精英——科学图谱绘制与使用综合引文指标与诺贝尔奖得主的比较
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269116. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
'The winner takes it all?' Nobel laureates and the public image of science.“胜者通吃?”诺贝尔奖得主与科学的公众形象
Public Underst Sci. 2018 May;27(4):390-396. doi: 10.1177/0963662518764948.
2
The character of scientists in the Nobel Prize speeches.诺贝尔奖演讲中科学家的特质。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 May;27(4):417-432. doi: 10.1177/0963662518756559.
3
Automatic jargon identifier for scientists engaging with the public and science communication educators.面向与公众互动的科学家和科学传播教育工作者的自动术语识别工具。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0181742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181742. eCollection 2017.
4
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.