• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习优化预测特征以评估单枚玻璃化冷冻-解冻囊胚移植后早期流产风险

Optimizing predictive features using machine learning for early miscarriage risk following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

作者信息

Liu Lidan, Liu Bo, Wu Huimei, Gan Qiuying, Huang Qianyi, Li Mujun

机构信息

Guangxi Reproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

Reproductive Center, Nanning Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 16;16:1557667. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1557667. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1557667
PMID:40309447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040701/
Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can machine learning models accurately predict the risk of early miscarriage following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT)?

DESIGN

A dual-center retrospective analysis of 1,664 SVBT cycles, including 308 early miscarriage cases, was conducted across two reproductive centers. Multiple machine learning models, such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Voting Classifier, were developed. Metrics including Area Under the Curve(AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and specificity were used to evaluate model performance. Key predictors were identified through Mutual Information and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE).

RESULTS

Maternal age, paternal age, endometrial thickness, blastocyst quality, and ovarian stimulation parameters were identified as critical predictors. Compared to traditional statistical models such as logistic regression (AUC = 0.584), ensemble models demonstrated significantly improved predictive performance. The Voting Classifier achieved the highest AUC (0.836), accuracy (0.780), precision (0.914), and specificity (0.942), outperforming individual machine learning classifiers. The Gradient Boosting Classifier also exhibited strong performance (AUC 0.831, accuracy 0.777), confirming the effectiveness of ensemble learning in capturing complex predictors of early miscarriage risk.

CONCLUSION

Ensemble machine learning models, particularly the Voting Classifier and Gradient Boosting Classifier, significantly improve the prediction of early miscarriage following SVBT. These models provide accurate, individualized risk assessments, enhancing clinical decision-making and advancing personalized care in ART.

摘要

研究问题

机器学习模型能否准确预测单囊胚玻璃化冷冻-解冻移植(SVBT)后早期流产的风险?

设计

对两个生殖中心的1664个SVBT周期进行双中心回顾性分析,其中包括308例早期流产病例。开发了多种机器学习模型,如逻辑回归、随机森林、梯度提升和投票分类器。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、准确率、精确率、召回率、F1分数和特异性等指标来评估模型性能。通过互信息和递归特征消除(RFE)确定关键预测因素。

结果

产妇年龄、父亲年龄、子宫内膜厚度、囊胚质量和卵巢刺激参数被确定为关键预测因素。与逻辑回归等传统统计模型(AUC = 0.584)相比,集成模型的预测性能有显著提高。投票分类器的AUC(0.836)、准确率(0.780)、精确率(0.914)和特异性(0.942)最高,优于单个机器学习分类器。梯度提升分类器也表现出强大的性能(AUC 0.831,准确率0.777),证实了集成学习在捕捉早期流产风险复杂预测因素方面的有效性。

结论

集成机器学习模型,特别是投票分类器和梯度提升分类器,显著提高了SVBT后早期流产的预测能力。这些模型提供了准确的个性化风险评估,增强了临床决策,并推动了辅助生殖技术中的个性化护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/99e7603146d0/fendo-16-1557667-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/12d0025338fa/fendo-16-1557667-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/3c6fac4932e3/fendo-16-1557667-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/f841aa476787/fendo-16-1557667-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/99e7603146d0/fendo-16-1557667-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/12d0025338fa/fendo-16-1557667-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/3c6fac4932e3/fendo-16-1557667-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/f841aa476787/fendo-16-1557667-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/239f/12040701/99e7603146d0/fendo-16-1557667-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing predictive features using machine learning for early miscarriage risk following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.利用机器学习优化预测特征以评估单枚玻璃化冷冻-解冻囊胚移植后早期流产风险
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 16;16:1557667. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1557667. eCollection 2025.
2
Identifying key predictive features for live birth rate in advanced maternal age patients undergoing single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.识别高龄患者行玻璃化冷冻解冻囊胚移植后活产率的关键预测特征。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Oct 7;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01295-7.
3
Developing and validating a prediction model of live birth following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.制定并验证玻璃化冷冻-解冻囊胚移植后活产预测模型。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Jul;49(1):103890. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103890. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
4
Pregnancy prediction performance of an annotation-free embryo scoring system on the basis of deep learning after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: a single-center large cohort retrospective study.基于深度学习的无注释胚胎评分系统在单次玻璃化冷冻解冻囊胚移植后的妊娠预测性能:一项单中心大样本回顾性研究。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Oct;116(4):1172-1180. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
5
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting ongoing pregnancy in single vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer cycles.预测单个玻璃化冷冻-解冻囊胚移植周期持续妊娠的列线图的开发和验证。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 23;14:1257764. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1257764. eCollection 2023.
6
Using blastocyst re-expansion rate for deciding when to warm a new blastocyst for single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.使用囊胚再扩张率来决定何时对新的囊胚进行复温,以进行单枚玻璃化冷冻-复温囊胚移植。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Dec;47(6):103378. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103378. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
7
Correlation between an annotation-free embryo scoring system based on deep learning and live birth/neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: a single-centre, large-cohort retrospective study.基于深度学习的无注释胚胎评分系统与单个玻璃化冷冻解冻囊胚移植后活产/新生儿结局的相关性:一项单中心、大样本回顾性研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Sep;39(9):2089-2099. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02562-5. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
Prediction of clinical pregnancy outcome after single fresh blastocyst transfer during in vitro fertilization: an ensemble learning perspective.体外受精中单囊胚移植后临床妊娠结局的预测:集成学习视角。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2024 Dec;27(1):2422918. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2422918. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and double vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer according to the day of vitrification.根据玻璃化冷冻日比较单个和双个玻璃化冷冻-解冻囊胚移植的临床结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013 Jun;30(6):779-85. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0017-y. Epub 2013 May 30.
10
Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.根据囊胚形态和扩张阶段进行新鲜或玻璃化胚胎移植后的妊娠及分娩结局,以及延迟发育的培养策略。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1685-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew127. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the potential of machine learning in gynecological care: a review.探索机器学习在妇科护理中的潜力:综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2347-2365. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07479-1. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Development and validation of a visualized prediction model for early miscarriage risk in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI procedures: a real-world multi-center study.体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)患者早期流产风险可视化预测模型的开发与验证:一项真实世界多中心研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 14;14:1280145. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1280145. eCollection 2023.
3
Challenges and limitations of synthetic minority oversampling techniques in machine learning.
机器学习中合成少数类过采样技术的挑战与局限
World J Methodol. 2023 Dec 20;13(5):373-378. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.373.
4
Ensemble Learning for Disease Prediction: A Review.用于疾病预测的集成学习:综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 20;11(12):1808. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121808.
5
Machine learning applied in maternal and fetal health: a narrative review focused on pregnancy diseases and complications.机器学习在母婴健康中的应用:一篇以妊娠疾病和并发症为重点的叙述性综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 May 19;14:1130139. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1130139. eCollection 2023.
6
Embryo classification beyond pregnancy: early prediction of first trimester miscarriage using machine learning.胚胎分类超越妊娠:使用机器学习早期预测早期流产。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Feb;40(2):309-322. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02619-5. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
7
Incidence and risk factors for early pregnancy loss in women with first pregnancy undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.体外受精-胚胎移植后首次妊娠的早期妊娠丢失的发生率及危险因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04904-8.
8
Machine learning to predict pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda.机器学习预测妊娠结局:系统评价、综合框架和未来研究议程。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04594-2.
9
Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss.流产不容忽视:早期妊娠丢失的流行病学、身体、心理和经济成本。
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1658-1667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
10
Two of a kind? Immunological and clinical risk factors differ between recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage.同种情况?复发性植入失败和复发性流产的免疫和临床危险因素不同。
J Reprod Immunol. 2020 Sep;141:103166. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2020.103166. Epub 2020 Jun 20.