• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术:避免残余主动脉瓣反流的策略。

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: Strategies to avoid residual aortic regurgitation.

作者信息

Kari Fabian A, Czerny Martin, Borger Michael, Misfeld Martin, Zimmer Emmanuel, Siepe Matthias, Hagl Christian, Detter Christian, Petersen Johannes, Richardt Doreen, Ensminger Stephan, Werner Paul, Andreas Martin, Pichlmaier Maximilian, Mueller Christoph S

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.

Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2025 Mar 3;24:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.015. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.015
PMID:40309692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12039440/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to identify quantitative criteria to avoid residual aortic valve regurgitation after valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2023, 738 adult patients were recruited into the German Aortic Root Repair Registry. A total of 562 patients with datasets on aortic root measurements and tricuspid valve treated with reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement were selected. End points were any grade of residual aortic valve regurgitation and postrepair coaptation height. Tested variables included procedural and anatomic characteristics, including length of cusp margins and geometric cusp heights.

RESULTS

The optimal classifier predicting freedom from residual aortic valve regurgitation was cusp coaptation height 8 to 9 mm or more (sensitivity = 0.7-0.8). Annular downsizing alone was not useful to predict residual aortic valve regurgitation ( = .472, 95% area CI, 0.414-0.54). Patients with a mean free margin length of at least 45 mm and a sum of free margin lengths of at least 125 mm were more likely to present coaptation heights of at least 10 mm (R2 0.038,  = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

The target coaptation height after valve-sparing aortic root replacement should exceed 8 to 9 mm. Chances of achieving it can be estimated on the basis of a measurement of cusp quantity. If in doubt when inspecting a valve, numerical criteria can help with surgical decision-making in favor of or against a valve-sparing approach.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定在保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术后避免残余主动脉瓣反流的定量标准。

方法

2016年至2023年期间,738例成年患者被纳入德国主动脉根部修复注册研究。总共选择了562例有主动脉根部测量数据集且接受了保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入置换术治疗的患者。终点为任何级别的残余主动脉瓣反流和修复后的瓣叶对合高度。测试变量包括手术和解剖特征,包括瓣叶边缘长度和几何瓣叶高度。

结果

预测无残余主动脉瓣反流的最佳分类指标是瓣叶对合高度为8至9毫米或更高(敏感性=0.7-0.8)。单纯环缩对预测残余主动脉瓣反流并无帮助(P=0.472,95%面积置信区间,0.414-0.54)。平均游离缘长度至少为45毫米且游离缘长度总和至少为125毫米的患者更有可能出现至少10毫米的对合高度(R2=0.038,P=0.006)。

结论

保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术后的目标对合高度应超过8至9毫米。可以根据瓣叶数量的测量来估计实现该目标的可能性。在检查瓣膜时如有疑问,数值标准有助于支持或反对保留瓣膜方法的手术决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/2e963db778c5/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/f4500357a989/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/732402927a5c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/4795972d10be/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/0a7f2253655a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/2c3bec182d2a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/e068614740ee/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/cf008f68f65a/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/81b06b0999a1/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/2e963db778c5/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/f4500357a989/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/732402927a5c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/4795972d10be/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/0a7f2253655a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/2c3bec182d2a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/e068614740ee/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/cf008f68f65a/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/81b06b0999a1/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6df5/12039440/2e963db778c5/fx4.jpg

相似文献

1
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: Strategies to avoid residual aortic regurgitation.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术:避免残余主动脉瓣反流的策略。
JTCVS Open. 2025 Mar 3;24:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.015. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Impact of annulus-cusp mismatch on mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.瓣环-瓣叶不匹配对保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术主动脉瓣修复中期结果的影响
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 5;40(3). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf048.
3
The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.瓣环尺寸及瓣环成形术在三尖瓣主动脉瓣修复中的作用。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):428-37; discussion 437-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv050. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
4
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement for valves with paracommissural fenestrations: which valve will fail?保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术治疗伴有瓣叶连合旁开窗的瓣膜病变:哪个瓣膜会发生功能障碍?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 4;67(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf034.
5
Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study.正常三尖瓣主动脉瓣的游离缘长度和对合面积:解剖学研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 1;53(5):1040-1048. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx456.
6
Aortic valve reimplantation for large root aneurysm and high-grade aortic regurgitation: incidence and implications of additional cusp and commissure repair.用于治疗大根部动脉瘤和重度主动脉瓣反流的主动脉瓣再植入术:额外瓣叶和瓣环交界修复的发生率及影响
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 May;20(5):611-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv020. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
Outcomes of aortic valve repair: early results from the German Aortic Valve Registry.主动脉瓣修复的结果:来自德国主动脉瓣注册中心的早期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 2;62(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac416.
8
Incidence and progression of mild aortic regurgitation after Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement.经 Tirone David 主动脉瓣保留式主动脉根部替换术后轻度主动脉瓣反流的发生率和进展情况。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):169-77, 178.e1-178.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
9
Outcomes of aortic root replacement with tricuspid aortic valve reimplantation in patients with residual aortic regurgitation.三尖瓣主动脉瓣再植入术治疗残余主动脉瓣反流患者的主动脉根部置换术结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jan;167(1):101-111.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.038. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
10
Tricuspidization technique with reimplantation for a bicuspid aortic valve: a case report.采用再植入术的三尖瓣化技术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣:一例病例报告
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases. 2022 Sep 27;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44215-022-00005-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Valve-sparing root replacement versus composite valve graft root replacement: Analysis of more than 1500 patients from 2 aortic centers.保留瓣膜的根部替换与复合瓣膜移植物根部替换:2 个主动脉中心的 1500 多例患者分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;168(3):770-780.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.022. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Long-term durability of valve-sparing root replacement in patients with and without connective tissue disease.有结缔组织病与无结缔组织病患者行保留瓣膜的根部替换术的长期耐久性。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;168(3):735-743.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.033. Epub 2023 May 6.
3
Reintervention after valve-sparing aortic root replacement: A comprehensive analysis of 781 David V procedures.
保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部替换术后再次干预:781 例 David V 手术的综合分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;167(4):1229-1238.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 6.
4
The 170°/190° commissure positioning technique for bicuspid aortic valve repair using valve-sparing aortic root replacement.使用保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术修复二叶式主动脉瓣的170°/190°交界定位技术。
JTCVS Tech. 2023 Jan 23;18:37-39. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.01.012. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement Technique: Valsalva Graft versus Two Straight Tubular Grafts.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换技术:窦管 graft 与两个直管状 graft 的比较。 (注:这里“graft”可能是医学术语“移植物”之类的意思,具体准确含义需结合专业医学语境进一步确定)
Cardiol Res Pract. 2023 Feb 3;2023:4076881. doi: 10.1155/2023/4076881. eCollection 2023.
6
Twenty-year experience of aortic valve reimplantation using the Valsalva graft.使用瓦氏窦移植物进行主动脉瓣再植入的20年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Mar 1;63(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac591.
7
A multicentre, propensity score matched analysis comparing a valve-sparing approach to valve replacement in aortic root aneurysm: Insight from the AVIATOR database.多中心、倾向评分匹配分析比较主动脉根部瘤行保留瓣膜手术与瓣膜置换术:来自 AVIATOR 数据库的见解。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Feb 3;63(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac514.
8
AORTLANTIC: French registry of aortic valve-sparing root replacement, preliminary multicentre results from western France.AORTLANTIC:法国主动脉瓣环成形术保留主动脉根部置换术注册研究,来自法国西部的初步多中心结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Oct 10;35(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac240.
9
Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.接受再植入术与Bentall根部手术患者的结局比较。
Aorta (Stamford). 2022 Apr;10(2):57-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744135. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
10
Impact of aortic valve effective height following valve-sparing root replacement on postoperative insufficiency and reoperation.保留主动脉瓣根部置换术后主动脉瓣有效高度对术后反流及再次手术的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec;164(6):1672-1680.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.02.065. Epub 2022 Apr 14.