Suppr超能文献

用于预测认知衰退和转化为阿尔茨海默病的埃尔朗根评分与pTau/Aβ1-42比值的比较

Comparison of ERlangen Score with pTau/Aβ1-42 Ratio for Predicting Cognitive Decline and Conversion to Alzheimer's Disease.

作者信息

Schwarz Julian Alexander, Schulz Pauline, Utz Janine, Rudtke Laura, Jablonowski Johannes, Klement Neele, Lewczuk Piotr, Kornhuber Johannes, Maler Juan Manuel, Oberstein Timo Jan

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-267 Białystok, Poland.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 23;15(4):334. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040334.

Abstract

: The ERlangen Score (ERS) and the pTau/Aβ1-42 ratio are dementia risk scores that use only surrogate markers of amyloid and tau pathology, whose performance has taken on added importance with the advent of anti-amyloid antibody therapies. Direct comparisons between the scores are limited, which is why the performance of the ERlangen Score (ERS) and the pTau/Aβ1-42 ratio in predicting cognitive decline and dementia risk were compared. : Measurements of Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and pTau181 were conducted in cerebrospinal fluid samples using immunoassays. Linear mixed models and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, receiver operating characteristic = ROC) of 259 non-demented subjects were calculated. : The pTau/Aβ1-42 ratio correctly identified 55 out of 60 individuals with a positive Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio and pTau181 as having Alzheimer's disease (AD), while the ERS correctly identified all of these individuals. The model using the ERS to predict cognitive trajectories (Akaike Information Criterion AIC = 2365) exhibited a marginally superior fit than the model using the pTau/Aβ1-42 ratio (AIC = 2371). There was no statistically significant difference in the AUC of the ERS (0.717) for dementia risk compared to the pTau/Aβ1-42 ratio (0.739), = 0.179. However, when the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio was not included in the ERS (AUC = 0.685), the pTau/Aβ1-42 score was found to be statistically significantly better, = 0.007. : The ERS showed an advantage in grouping, identifying all patients with a positive Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio and elevated pTau181 as having AD. The ERS and pTau/Aβ1-42 ratio were comparable in predicting dementia or cognitive decline. However, when the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio is not available, the pTau/Aβ1-42 ratio should be preferred.

摘要

埃尔朗根评分(ERS)和pTau/Aβ1-42比值是痴呆风险评分,它们仅使用淀粉样蛋白和tau蛋白病理的替代标志物,随着抗淀粉样蛋白抗体疗法的出现,其性能变得更加重要。各评分之间的直接比较有限,这就是比较埃尔朗根评分(ERS)和pTau/Aβ1-42比值在预测认知衰退和痴呆风险方面性能的原因。:使用免疫测定法对脑脊液样本中的Aβ1-42、Aβ1-40和pTau181进行测量。计算了259名非痴呆受试者的线性混合模型和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC,受试者工作特征=ROC)。:pTau/Aβ1-42比值正确识别出60名Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40比值和pTau181呈阳性的个体中有55名患有阿尔茨海默病(AD),而ERS正确识别出了所有这些个体。使用ERS预测认知轨迹的模型(赤池信息准则AIC = 2365)显示出比使用pTau/Aβ1-42比值的模型(AIC = 2371)略优的拟合度。与pTau/Aβ1-42比值(0.739)相比,ERS用于痴呆风险的AUC(0.717)无统计学显著差异,P = 0.179。然而,当ERS中不包括Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40比值时(AUC = 0.685),发现pTau/Aβ1-42评分在统计学上显著更好,P = 0.007。:ERS在分组方面显示出优势,将所有Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40比值为阳性且pTau181升高的患者识别为患有AD。ERS和pTau/Aβ1-42比值在预测痴呆或认知衰退方面具有可比性。然而,当无法获得Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40比值时,应优先选择pTau/Aβ1-42比值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/541d/12026031/7c292032b797/brainsci-15-00334-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验