Freling Sarah R, Richie Iman, Norwitz Daniel, Canamar Catherine P, Banerjee Josh, Davar Kusha, Clark Devin, Spellberg Brad
Department of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258079. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8079.
Few bedside tools with defined accuracy have been described that are useful to alter bayesian prior probability for infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with bacteremia.
To evaluate the accuracy of simple blood culture parameters to guide pretest probability of IE.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, retrospective case-control study of blood culture data in adults with IE vs without IE was conducted at 3 acute care public hospitals in the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services between December 2018 and August 2022. Patients were individuals aged 18 years or older who had positive blood cultures and met the inclusion criteria, including cases who met the Duke criteria for definite or possible IE, and control cases who did not have concern for endocarditis.
Positive blood cultures for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, low-risk Streptococcus species, or high-risk Streptococcus species.
The primary outcome was the negative likelihood ratio (LR) of having endocarditis based on the number of positive blood cultures on admission. Positive LRs, evaluation of 2 or more of 4 bottles positive on admission, bacteremia lasting for at least 2 days, and combination groups were secondary outcomes.
A total of 252 eligible patients with IE (182 male [72%]; median [IQR] age, 54 [38-65] years), including 164 definite and 88 possible IE cases, and 455 controls (321 male [71%]; median [IQR] age, 53 [41-63] years) were identified. The negative LR point estimates for having IE with only 1 of 4 positive blood culture bottles on admission ranged from 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.37) for E faecalis to 0.12 (95% CI, 0.03-0.49) for methicillin-susceptible S aureus. Sensitivity analysis of cases restricted to definite IE found similar results. Blood culture clearance by day 2 also had modestly helpful negative LRs for methicillin-resistant S aureus (0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.42) and Enterococcus species (0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.56). If patients had 4 of 4 bottles positive on admission, positive LRs were helpful for Enterococcus species (LR, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.53-7.02) and high-risk streptococci (LR, 5.35; 95% CI, 3.39-8.42) and for all organisms with persistent bacteremia (with LRs ranging from 1.78 [95% CI, 1.36-2.34] to 9.60 [95% CI, 3.43-44.60]). If both were true, the positive LRs ranged from 1.63 (95% CI, 1.17-2.28) to 8.59 (95% CI, 3.43-21.55) for all organisms.
In this case-control study of patients with and without IE, the number of initial positive blood culture bottles and days to culture clearance were helpful to adjust pretest probability of IE. These findings may help guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions around bacteremia early during hospitalization.
很少有已明确准确性且有助于改变菌血症患者感染性心内膜炎(IE)贝叶斯先验概率的床边工具被描述。
评估简单血培养参数对指导IE预测试概率的准确性。
设计、设置和参与者:这项对有IE和无IE的成年人血培养数据进行的多中心、回顾性病例对照研究,于2018年12月至2022年8月在洛杉矶县卫生服务部的3家急性护理公立医院进行。患者为18岁及以上血培养阳性且符合纳入标准的个体,包括符合杜克标准的确诊或可能的IE病例,以及无感染性心内膜炎疑虑的对照病例。
对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、低风险链球菌属或高风险链球菌属的血培养阳性。
主要结局是根据入院时阳性血培养瓶数得出的患心内膜炎的阴性似然比(LR)。阳性似然比、入院时4瓶中有2瓶或更多瓶阳性的评估、菌血症持续至少2天以及联合组是次要结局。
共确定了252例符合条件的IE患者(182例男性[72%];中位[IQR]年龄,54[38 - 65]岁),包括164例确诊和88例可能的IE病例,以及455例对照(321例男性[71%];中位[IQR]年龄,53[41 - 63]岁)。入院时4瓶血培养中只有1瓶阳性时患IE的阴性LR点估计值范围为,粪肠球菌为0.05(95%CI,0.01 - 0.37),甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌为0.12(95%CI,0.03 - 0.49)。对仅限于确诊IE病例的敏感性分析得出了类似结果。第2天血培养转阴对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(0.24;95%CI,0.13 - 0.42)和肠球菌属(0.34;95%CI,0.21 - 0.56)也有适度有用的阴性LR。如果患者入院时4瓶血培养均为阳性,阳性似然比对肠球菌属(LR,4.21;95%CI,2.53 - 7.02)和高风险链球菌(LR,5.35;95%CI,3.39 - 8.42)以及所有有持续性菌血症的微生物(LR范围为1.78[95%CI,1.36 - 2.34]至9.60[95%CI,3.43 - 44.6])有帮助。如果两者都成立,所有微生物的阳性似然比范围为1.63(95%CI,1.