G Monith Raj, D David Wilson, V Jenitha, N B Kokelavani, M Srividhya, Vijay Nandana, V M Berlin Grace
Department of Biotechnology, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore 641114, Tamil Nadu, India.
School of Sciences, Arts and Media, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore 641114, Tamil Nadu, India.
Fitoterapia. 2025 Jul;184:106577. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2025.106577. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
Essential oils derived from aromatic and non-aromatic plant sources, are recognized for their in vivo potential therapeutic benefits, including anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, immunomodulatory and other regulatory roles by the scientific community. However, translation of such in vivo therapeutic application in clinical field is not yet available. This study examines the pre-clinical scientific studies on varied administration methods of essential oils for therapeutic purposes. The focus of this study is to explore the different administration routes, which are crucial for optimizing the delivery of these bioactive compounds for internal administration and improving their therapeutic effectiveness. Traditional and innovative methods, such as inhalation, dermal application, oral ingestion, intraperitoneal injection, and intravenous infusion are investigated. Each route has its advantages and challenges, which may impact the bioavailability, systemic distribution and toxicity of essential oils. However, such comparative pharmacokinetic and toxicity studies are lacking for the essential oils. The available basic information regarding in vivo bioavailability and toxic reactions of essential oils are discussed briefly in this review. The research findings have significant implications for developing targeted and personalized essential oil treatments, advancing integrative medicine and complementary therapy approaches. The analysis of various in vivo therapeutic study findings implies that a promising therapeutic efficiency can be achieved with essential oils at different dose ranges for different routes of administrations. The comparative analysis on therapeutic effects of different routes of administration and methods essential oil extraction are lacking. The bioavailability and toxicity studies are also limited for these therapeutic studies. Furthermore, the detailed molecular mechanism of in vivo therapeutic actions is not yet established in the studies. Ultimately, this investigation adds to the expanding knowledge base on essential oil administration routes, providing valuable guidance for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of natural medicine. However, extensive in vivo pre-clinical studies are warranted for translation of essential oil therapy to clinical usage. Also all the traditional uses of essential oil for therapy must be validated via scientific studies.
从芳香和非芳香植物来源提取的精油,因其在体内潜在的治疗益处而被科学界认可,这些益处包括抗氧化、抗炎、抗癌、免疫调节及其他调节作用。然而,此类体内治疗应用在临床领域尚未实现。本研究考察了精油用于治疗目的的不同给药方法的临床前科学研究。本研究的重点是探索不同的给药途径,这对于优化这些生物活性化合物的内服给药及提高其治疗效果至关重要。研究了传统和创新方法,如吸入、皮肤应用、口服、腹腔注射和静脉输注。每种途径都有其优点和挑战,这可能会影响精油的生物利用度、全身分布和毒性。然而,精油缺乏此类比较药代动力学和毒性研究。本综述简要讨论了关于精油体内生物利用度和毒性反应的现有基础信息。研究结果对于开发有针对性的个性化精油治疗、推进整合医学和补充治疗方法具有重要意义。对各种体内治疗研究结果的分析表明,不同给药途径在不同剂量范围内使用精油可实现有前景的治疗效果。缺乏对不同给药途径和精油提取方法的治疗效果的比较分析。这些治疗研究的生物利用度和毒性研究也很有限。此外,研究中尚未确定体内治疗作用的详细分子机制。最终,本研究增加了关于精油给药途径的知识基础,为自然医学领域的医疗保健专业人员和研究人员提供了有价值的指导。然而,精油疗法转化为临床应用需要进行广泛的体内临床前研究。此外,精油治疗的所有传统用途都必须通过科学研究进行验证。