Castellani Daniele, Somani Bhaskar Kumar, Fong Khi Yung, Yuen Steffi Kar Kei, Heng Chin Tiong, Elshazly Mohamed, Tan Karl, Herrmann Thomas R W, Traxer Olivier, Gauhar Vineet
Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
European Association of Urology Section of Endourology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Investig Clin Urol. 2025 May;66(3):236-244. doi: 10.4111/icu.20250071.
To evaluate whether using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath can obviate insertion of double J stent and establish the safety of overnight ureteric catheter placement as alternative following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones.
Five hundred forty adults were prospectively enrolled across 25 centers (from April 2023 to January 2024). Patients were divided into group 1 (overnight ureteric catheter), and group 2 (double J stent). Surgeons could choose either modality as per their discretion. One-to-one propensity score-matching for age, sex, pre-stenting, Hounsfield units, stone volume and location was performed. Thirty-day computed tomography scan was done to estimate stone-free status.
After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Group 1 had significantly shorter lasing, ureteroscopy, surgical time. Median day 1 loin pain score was similar (1 [1, 2] in both groups). Median postoperative stay was shorter in group 1 (0 days [0, 1] vs. 1 day [0, 2], p<0.001). One patient in group 2 required a blood transfusion. Incidence of fever was similar (5.0% vs. 0.8%). Loin/abdominal pain requiring medication occurred in one patient in group 2. Stent-related symptoms occurred in 2 patients in group 1. Three patients (2.5%) in group 1 and 2 patients (1.7%) in group 2 required readmission. Thirty-day stone-free status was higher in group 1 patients (79.2% vs. 56.7%).
In selected patients after thorough inspection to ensure no injury or residual fragments remain, placing an overnight ureteric catheter can be a safe alternative to a double J stent.
评估使用可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘是否可以避免双J支架置入,并确定在肾结石的输尿管软镜检查后,作为替代方案留置输尿管过夜导管的安全性。
2023年4月至2024年1月期间,25个中心前瞻性纳入了540名成年人。患者分为第1组(留置输尿管过夜导管)和第2组(置入双J支架)。外科医生可自行选择任何一种方式。对年龄、性别、支架置入前情况、亨氏单位、结石体积和位置进行一对一倾向评分匹配。进行30天的计算机断层扫描以评估结石清除状态。
匹配后,每组纳入120名患者。第1组的激光碎石、输尿管镜检查和手术时间明显更短。第1天的腰部疼痛评分中位数相似(两组均为1[1,2])。第1组的术后住院时间中位数更短(0天[0,1]对1天[0,2],p<0.001)。第2组有1名患者需要输血。发热发生率相似(5.0%对0.8%)。第2组有1名患者出现需要药物治疗的腰部/腹部疼痛。第1组有2名患者出现与支架相关的症状。第1组有3名患者(2.5%)和第2组有2名患者(1.7%)需要再次入院。第1组患者的30天结石清除率更高(79.2%对56.7%)。
在经过全面检查以确保无损伤或残留碎片的特定患者中,留置输尿管过夜导管可以作为双J支架的一种安全替代方案。