Saito Yoshitaka, Takekuma Yoh, Komatsu Yoshito, Sugawara Mitsuru
Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics & Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, 4-1, Maeda 7-jo 15-chome, Teine-ku, Sapporo, 006-8585, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-jo, Nishi 5-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 2;33(5):443. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09497-4.
Regorafenib improves the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, proteinuria frequently occurs in regorafenib treatment, and development of severe hypertension, which is closely related to proteinuria, is associated with better treatment outcomes. We previously reported that patients with baseline proteinuria exhibit regorafenib-induced problematic symptoms. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of baseline proteinuria on the treatment efficacy of regorafenib for mCRC.
Patients with mCRC receiving regorafenib (n = 100) were categorized into control (without baseline proteinuria) and pre-existing proteinuria (baseline grades 1-2) groups and retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS).
Patients in the pre-existing proteinuria group exhibited significantly worse PFS than those in the control group (median with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 51 (46-56) and 56 (49-81) days, respectively; P = 0.04). Overall survival and disease control rate were lower in the pre-existing proteinuria group than in the control group although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.11 and 0.10, respectively). Similar results were obtained in the propensity score-matched population. Multivariate Cox hazard regression analyses revealed that baseline pre-existing proteinuria was associated with poor PFS (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.03-2.72; P = 0.04). Additionally, ratio of drug suspension duration during all treatment cycles was higher in patients with pre-existing proteinuria than those without symptoms.
Our results suggest that patients with baseline proteinuria experience poor PFS following regorafenib treatment for mCRC, although we should consider the clinical significance of the difference.
瑞戈非尼可提高转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的生存率。然而,蛋白尿在瑞戈非尼治疗中频繁出现,且与蛋白尿密切相关的严重高血压的发生与更好的治疗结果相关。我们之前报道过基线蛋白尿患者会出现瑞戈非尼诱导的问题症状。在本研究中,我们旨在评估基线蛋白尿对瑞戈非尼治疗mCRC疗效的影响。
将接受瑞戈非尼治疗的mCRC患者(n = 100)分为对照组(无基线蛋白尿)和既往有蛋白尿组(基线1 - 2级),并进行回顾性评估。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。
既往有蛋白尿组患者的PFS明显差于对照组(中位数及95%置信区间[CI]分别为51(46 - 56)天和56(49 - 81)天;P = 0.04)。既往有蛋白尿组的总生存期和疾病控制率低于对照组,尽管差异无统计学意义(分别为P = 0.11和0.10)。在倾向评分匹配人群中也得到了类似结果。多因素Cox风险回归分析显示,基线既往有蛋白尿与较差的PFS相关(调整后风险比 = 1.67;95% CI = 1.03 - 2.72;P = 0.04)。此外,既往有蛋白尿的患者在所有治疗周期中药物暂停持续时间的比例高于无症状患者。
我们的结果表明,基线蛋白尿患者在接受瑞戈非尼治疗mCRC后PFS较差,尽管我们应考虑该差异的临床意义。